Hi Martin,

On 2021-05-10 13:35, Martin wrote:

trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus
Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its
climate-friendly resource usage :-)

Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there".

I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian 11, or
better miss one stable release and have it in better shape for
Debian 12.

If nobody objects, I'll file a bug to keep it out of Debian 11.

I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
that I am not aware of?

Best,
Andrius

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Dears,

trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus
Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its
climate-friendly resource usage :-)

Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there".

I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian 11, or
better miss one stable release and have it in better shape for
Debian 12.

If nobody objects, I'll file a bug to keep it out of Debian 11.

Comments welcome!

Cheers

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:35:41AM +0000, Martin wrote:

Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there".

I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian 11, or
better miss one stable release and have it in better shape for
Debian 12.

I don't object. Typically I am against releasing knowingly not
ready-to-ship software. If one of the maintainers comes up with a
reasonable argument against this view, then we should listen to it.

--
Best regards,

Barin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEamWoEh2ctQvZdf1IHcbm2RQwqBYFAmCZIOwACgkQHcbm2RQw qBaHwwv+PqeJmuEMYKhlz2lESZYWh7BONlIxjpWcmrF3iT94LF26izXdtuntwpkP i+f6PeJhEw/ejsyFfnqjZnn6KeenMAYkFCVKJMFbqHVnmDpnStJO6CihucfbjW6F Pw9a8Aof0RG0jBhDEIA2UT3vbflzMST7HmwRo5HO7+H+o2azXzXaOqF8Yybe6QOL cmdrTTvqW9LBGOfbck+Q/ZOceHilkcpDMZVmiZIMEQtWzoCuAUR0grsKOFOdD64M 9DBywB9vv0Elm4mVzNfNWAxy2E7KLiw82XmIT0n/QcGHuvdAKiIeEbRyZYrUdK7V JVSrlCsp7oo3pKg7Cdo5t3uOyfHTcvKij2gRHERdK0PrQGb+xTRcb1nbUGGsBHEe d66GKtPMFSIjI5JaW01q6xEwOz5AufM243Ubp9ggRtzwtBnaCZuEvVda4eriPBqa WP/bU1XBb9PYezgsCXU+hnQBew4QcCzs+RPXqxBu462jDXDOjV3sac6PcPQTsog4
/5Gv+jq9
=bf1Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2021-05-10 14:00, Andrius Merkys wrote:

I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
that I am not aware of?

I don't have a problem with slow development, but the current
version is probably not good enough to maintain it for some
years. I'm optimistic, that in some months or so 1.6.x will
be released, which should be fine. I'm planning to backport it
to Debian 11, so that users still can install trac easily.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)