On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:26:53AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Is it OK to follow [1] and stay faithful to upstream name, or should II would follow the naming policy and use python3-sphinx-press-theme.
rename both source and binary packages to match already existing sphinx
theme package names?
Hello,
I am working to package sphinx_press_theme (ITP bug #996543). According
to Python package naming conventions [1] proper binary package name for
it would be python3-sphinx-press-theme. However, most of sphinx theme packages seem to be named $THEME_NAME-sphinx-theme (source package), resulting in names like python3-$THEME_NAME-sphinx-theme (binary
package) [2].
Is it OK to follow [1] and stay faithful to upstream name, or should I
rename both source and binary packages to match already existing sphinx
theme package names?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 63:23:13 |
Calls: | 6,654 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,331,697 |