On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
python-pint (#1067318).
I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should
be sufficient to fix the issue.
If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream
version in the salsa.
Of course I will let to you the review and upload.
Please let me know,
kind regards
Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader.
Thomas
Dear Thomas,
Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
python-pint (#1067318).
I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should
be sufficient to fix the issue.
If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream
version in the salsa.
Of course I will let to you the review and upload.
Please let me know,
kind regards
Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader.
Thomas
Thanks Thomas
The packages is now updated in salsa.
Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to
reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression.
I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer
to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs.
Could you please review and upload?
I have also put myself as uploader.
I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described
in [3].
kind regards
I've packaged font-awesome5 at work, for sure it's not in Debian.
The upgrade to v5 was rightfully reverted but it's in limbo since.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-font-awesome
fonts-font-awesome (5.0.10+really4.7.0~dfsg-4.1) <------------------
Please note that this package provides Font Awesome 4
(not Font Awesome 5 or Font Awesome 6 which are different fonts with different licensing).
Le lun. 1 avr. 2024 à 21:26, Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it> a écrit :
Dear Thomas,
Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas,
Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
python-pint (#1067318).
I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should >>>>>> be sufficient to fix the issue.
If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream >>>>>> version in the salsa.
Of course I will let to you the review and upload.
Please let me know,
kind regards
Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader.
Thomas
Thanks Thomas
The packages is now updated in salsa.
Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to
reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression.
I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would
prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs.
Could you please review and upload?
I have also put myself as uploader.
I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as
described in [3].
kind regards
Hi!
Thanks for the work Antonio.
1/ In the clean target, please also clean:
- Pint.egg-info
- docs/savefig
2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright".
3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides
overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from
system instead?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
1/ and 2/ are now fixed
For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font
package providing the needed fonts
$ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf
gnunet:
/usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz
icinga-php-library:
Maybe node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free, but the version seems not to be
the same.
Actually I'm not really sure where these fonts are collected during the
build process.
Do you have any hint?
On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas,
Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
python-pint (#1067318).
I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should
be sufficient to fix the issue.
If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream
version in the salsa.
Of course I will let to you the review and upload.
Please let me know,
kind regards
Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader.
Thomas
Thanks Thomas
The packages is now updated in salsa.
Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to
reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression.
I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would
prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs.
Could you please review and upload?
I have also put myself as uploader.
I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as
described in [3].
kind regards
Hi!
Thanks for the work Antonio.
1/ In the clean target, please also clean:
- Pint.egg-info
- docs/savefig
2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright".
3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides
overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from
system instead?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On 4/5/24 10:14, Antonio Valentino wrote:
The change is already in salsa.
Please Thomas, let me know if this is acceptable for you.
Yeah, that's ok.
Unfortunately the package is not currently buildable because of an
update in python3-lxml that determined #1068349 [1]
Please ping me when I can build the package.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 349 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 107:02:22 |
Calls: | 7,612 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,786 |
Messages: | 5,682,995 |
Posted today: | 2 |