I am currently working on packages for cocotb [1] & pyuvm [2], both
are Python packages, that are used for verification (simulation) of
VHDL/*Verilog models, ie. their scope is electronics. Do I am
wondering whether to package them under Electeonics team or Python
team.
Also, I've set the Section source control field to 'electronics', yetleast one binary in $PATH named `cocotb-config`. Here is how it could be packaged:
lintian complained that since the binary package names are
python3-{cocotb/pyuvm}, then the section should be 'python'. Should I
ignore/override that ? Or should I modifybthe Section field to
'python' ?
From my quick look at cocotb’s documentation [3], it seems to ship at
[1] ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/1041288[3] https://docs.cocotb.org/en/stable/quickstart.html
[2] ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/1041285
From my quick look at cocotb’s documentation [3], it seems to ship at---end quoted text---
least one binary in $PATH named `cocotb-config`. Here is how it could be packaged:
- `cocotb` srcpkg in `electronics` section;
- `python3-cocotb` binpkg in `python` section, containing the library;
- `cocotb` binpkg in `electronics` section, Depends on `python3-cocotb`
and contains the executables.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 349 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 117:42:02 |
Calls: | 7,612 |
Files: | 12,786 |
Messages: | 5,683,923 |