Hi,

I am packaging the xdoctest to meet ubelt's[0] B-D.

Now I think it has a good shape in packaging[1], but I am not sure
about below warning:

```
W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]
P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11]
X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest] X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch]
X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest]

```
First, the executable program is placed in the /usr/bin directory, right?
In my understanding, Python modules should be put in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/xdoctest. But it is ok for program
entry in /usr/bin also.

If so, I should add manpage for it.

Please help me to confirm it, TIA.

BR,
Bo

[0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026966
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/xdoctest/-/tree/debian/main/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 3:01 PM Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I am packaging the xdoctest to meet ubelt's[0] B-D.

Now I think it has a good shape in packaging[1], but I am not sure
about below warning:

```
W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]
P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11]
X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest] X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch]
X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest]

```

...

If so, I should add manpage for it.

Today I try to add -doc package to meet lintian's check, this should
also basic requirement
for Python packages including docs dir. But again I ran into the
problem with the dependency[0] to use
sphinx to generate html, especially since it needs ubelt, the xdoctest
package itself to meet its dependencies.
So what is the better way to solve the issue?

BR,
Bo

[0]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/xdoctest/-/blob/debian/main/docs/requirements.txt

Please help me to confirm it, TIA.

BR,
Bo

[0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026966
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/xdoctest/-/tree/debian/main/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Bo (2022.12.26_07:01:29_+0000)

W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]

Yeah, applications *should* have manual pages, but it's not required. If
you need more tooling to build the manpage, it can wait until those
tools are available in Debian.

P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11]
X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch]

I'd ignore those.

X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest] X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest]

So, technically, xdoctest could be split into an xdoctest binary package
(the command) and python3-xdoctest (the library). Personally, I don't
bother to do that for niche tools like this. If it was a more
user-oriented package, then it could make more sense to split it.

SR

--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)