• Plato and censorship

    From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 10 21:34:37 2020
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Raymond Brisebois@21:1/5 to gggg...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 19 07:50:56 2020
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to gggg...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 19 08:48:02 2020
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to gggg...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 19 08:44:25 2020
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ed Cryer on Sat Sep 19 10:38:33 2020
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up
    in them. That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart,
    because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    The philosopher king in THE REPUBLIC:

    https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-republic/themes/philosopher-king

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed Cryer@21:1/5 to Raymond Brisebois on Sat Sep 19 18:29:28 2020
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up
    in them. That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart,
    because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ed Cryer on Sat Sep 19 10:40:49 2020
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up
    in them. That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart,
    because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    Class conflict and THE REPUBLIC:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict#Socrates

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed Cryer@21:1/5 to ggggg9271@gmail.com on Sat Sep 19 18:59:40 2020
    ggggg9271@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/

    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up
    in them. That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart,
    because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens
    appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be
    educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    Class conflict and THE REPUBLIC:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict#Socrates


    I think Plato believed in absolute Truth. Unlike Pontius Pilate after
    his day.
    Yes, without a doubt, Plato believed in absolute Truth. I call to
    witness his mangling and laceration of "man is the measure of all
    things" and the relativism of the sophists of his day.
    That's the highway to bigotry; and it unfolds a view that human
    understanding is a linear progression, from lower to higher, maybe
    pulling up the ladder behind you.
    And those who have ascended higher are more fit to rule, because they
    can speak for all. They're older; a gerousia or senate.

    Not so! That's what our modern understanding of society shouts at us.
    Not so!

    If the history of philosophy is mere footnotes to Plato, have I missed something in his surviving works?

    Ed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed Cryer@21:1/5 to Ed Cryer on Sat Sep 19 19:15:37 2020
    Ed Cryer wrote:
    ggggg9271@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com
    wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/


    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up
    in them.  That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart,
    because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens >>> appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be
    educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    Class conflict and THE REPUBLIC:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict#Socrates


    I think Plato believed in absolute Truth. Unlike Pontius Pilate after
    his day.
    Yes, without a doubt, Plato believed in absolute Truth. I call to
    witness his mangling and laceration of "man is the measure of all
    things" and the relativism of the sophists of his day.
    That's the highway to bigotry; and it unfolds a view that human
    understanding is a linear progression, from lower to higher, maybe
    pulling up the ladder behind you.
    And those who have ascended higher are more fit to rule, because they
    can speak for all. They're older; a gerousia or senate.

    Not so! That's what our modern understanding of society shouts at us.
    Not so!

    If the history of philosophy is mere footnotes to Plato, have I missed something in his surviving works?

    Ed



    Thucydides, a modern day man from antiquity if ever there was one,
    understood this. It's almost the major theme of his Histories; the war
    between Athens and Sparta; democracy versus oligarchy (or was it
    monarchy in Sparta?).
    He tells us about the internal politics of Greek city-states during the
    war, how they fluctuated between the Athenian hegemony and the Spartan
    one. And the warring elements were political factions inside the cities.
    Notice how the very rumour of a Spartan fleet in the area in the Aegean provoked a right-wing revolt, away from the democratic Athenian league
    to the Spartan style. And when Sparta finally defeated Athens they set
    up an oligarchy there.


    And the debates in the Assembly that he gives at length. It's all there.

    Ed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ed Cryer on Sat Sep 19 12:50:38 2020
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:15:54 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Ed Cryer wrote:
    wrote:
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, gggg...@gmail.com >>>> wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/


    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up >>> in them.  That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart, >>> because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens >>> appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be >>> educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    Class conflict and THE REPUBLIC:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict#Socrates


    I think Plato believed in absolute Truth. Unlike Pontius Pilate after
    his day.
    Yes, without a doubt, Plato believed in absolute Truth. I call to
    witness his mangling and laceration of "man is the measure of all
    things" and the relativism of the sophists of his day.
    That's the highway to bigotry; and it unfolds a view that human understanding is a linear progression, from lower to higher, maybe
    pulling up the ladder behind you.
    And those who have ascended higher are more fit to rule, because they
    can speak for all. They're older; a gerousia or senate.

    Not so! That's what our modern understanding of society shouts at us.
    Not so!

    If the history of philosophy is mere footnotes to Plato, have I missed something in his surviving works?

    Ed



    Thucydides, a modern day man from antiquity if ever there was one, understood this. It's almost the major theme of his Histories; the war between Athens and Sparta; democracy versus oligarchy (or was it
    monarchy in Sparta?).
    He tells us about the internal politics of Greek city-states during the
    war, how they fluctuated between the Athenian hegemony and the Spartan
    one. And the warring elements were political factions inside the cities. Notice how the very rumour of a Spartan fleet in the area in the Aegean provoked a right-wing revolt, away from the democratic Athenian league
    to the Spartan style. And when Sparta finally defeated Athens they set
    up an oligarchy there.


    And the debates in the Assembly that he gives at length. It's all there.

    Ed

    https://professornerdster.com/tag/sparknotes-thucydides/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ggggg9271@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ed Cryer on Sat Sep 19 12:49:18 2020
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:15:54 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Ed Cryer wrote:
    ggggg9271@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 10:30:17 AM UTC-7, Ed Cryer wrote:
    Raymond Brisebois wrote:
    On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:34:37 a.m. UTC-4, .com
    wrote:
    https://www.pe.com/2020/07/10/professing-faith-why-censorship-made-sense-to-plato/


    Fascinating article ... and very topical conclusion.

    RjlB


    I've often wondered what Plato would have made of our modern
    representative mass democracies; and in particular the modern Marxist
    view of society and class. I'd put it to Plato that the different
    classes need representatives from their midst; people who have grown up >>> in them.  That class struggles tore the city-states of his age apart, >>> because class-views are dialectically endemic in them.

    I can't recall ever seeing this question dealt with in any of his
    writings, even though the tripartite division of his Republican citizens >>> appears to indicate that he was aware of it. Philosopher kings would be >>> educated way, way out of the purview of a proletariat.

    Ed

    Class conflict and THE REPUBLIC:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_conflict#Socrates


    I think Plato believed in absolute Truth. Unlike Pontius Pilate after
    his day.
    Yes, without a doubt, Plato believed in absolute Truth. I call to
    witness his mangling and laceration of "man is the measure of all
    things" and the relativism of the sophists of his day.
    That's the highway to bigotry; and it unfolds a view that human understanding is a linear progression, from lower to higher, maybe
    pulling up the ladder behind you.
    And those who have ascended higher are more fit to rule, because they
    can speak for all. They're older; a gerousia or senate.

    Not so! That's what our modern understanding of society shouts at us.
    Not so!

    If the history of philosophy is mere footnotes to Plato, have I missed something in his surviving works?

    Ed



    Thucydides, a modern day man from antiquity if ever there was one, understood this. It's almost the major theme of his Histories; the war between Athens and Sparta; democracy versus oligarchy (or was it
    monarchy in Sparta?).
    He tells us about the internal politics of Greek city-states during the
    war, how they fluctuated between the Athenian hegemony and the Spartan
    one. And the warring elements were political factions inside the cities. Notice how the very rumour of a Spartan fleet in the area in the Aegean provoked a right-wing revolt, away from the democratic Athenian league
    to the Spartan style. And when Sparta finally defeated Athens they set
    up an oligarchy there.


    And the debates in the Assembly that he gives at length. It's all there.

    Ed

    https://professornerdster.com/tag/sparknotes-thucydides/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)