On 2017-06-25, Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:

Yes. I was able to do it as:

$ xclock -digital -update 1 -xrm "xclock*width:800" -xrm "xclock*height:800"

But, damn! It *still* doesn't make the actual characters (digits) any bigger. It just makes the da** window bigger.

You need to RTFM better:


-face pattern
This option specifies the font to use in digital mode when the
Xrender extension is used. Patterns are specified using the
fontconfig face format described in the Font Names section of
fonts.conf(5).


so you either need to use -face with a FontConfig spec, or you need to
give the -norender option, in which case -fn with an X font will work.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <slrnol1ib8.9v6.jcb@home.stevens-bradfield.com>,
Julian Bradfield <jcb@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
...

-face pattern
This option specifies the font to use in digital mode when the
Xrender extension is used. Patterns are specified using the
fontconfig face format described in the Font Names section of
fonts.conf(5).

so you either need to use -face with a FontConfig spec, or you need to
give the -norender option, in which case -fn with an X font will work.

To me, the documentation is gibberish. I'm just looking for a quick
solution. All I am trying to do is use xclock to time some other
processes, so I need it to be big and visible. In fact, it would also be
nice if I could make it "stays on top"; I know you can do this in MS
Windows, don't know if it can be done in X.

Anyway, I did see the bit about -face in the man page, but, as I said, it
is gibberish. Can you tell me what to put in for the "FontConfig spec" (whatever that is) ?

Also, I tried '-norender' - didn't change anything. Still get small characters, regardless of how big or small the window is.

So, the search for a solution continues...

--
I'm building a wall.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: comp.unix.programmer

In article <oiooki$hie$1@news.xmission.com>,
Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:

So I run xclock like this:

$ xclock -digital &
$

and it comes up, but it is very tiny, and I'd like it to be bigger.

xclock -norender -digital -fn '-misc-fixed-*-*-*-*-*-400-*-*-*-*-*-*'

works for me (FSVO "works"), but the same thing with "-render" and
"-face" doesn't.

-- Richard

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: comp.unix.programmer

gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:

So I punted and tried another Google search, and the "face"
option worked on the first try. Don't ask me what a "face"
is, and "how you get a list of faces".

Yeah, I share your sentiments.
But who cares what a "face" is as long as we have something that works.

Every clock has a face.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: comp.unix.programmer

In article <Li94B.37367$114.37298@fx15.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:

gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:

So I punted and tried another Google search, and the "face"
option worked on the first try. Don't ask me what a "face"
is, and "how you get a list of faces".

Yeah, I share your sentiments.
But who cares what a "face" is as long as we have something that works.

Every clock has a face.

Trite, but true.

--
Shikata ga nai...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)