Message ID: 370128
Posted By: panglozz
Posted On: 2006-05-04 15:51:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 14

To help you keep this straight, a listing of the paragraphs and reasons that SCOX wants to vaporize. Note that reading these items meaningfully is best accomplished with access to the un-expurgated declaration.

Paragraph to Strike
.8 Legal Analysis, Breach of Contract
.9 Legal Analysis, Breach of Contract
15 Interprets earlier orders Dec 2003, 2004, 2005
16 Interprets earlier orders Dec 2003
17 Interprets earlier orders March 2004

19 invalid comparison to SCO's own discovery request
27 Evaluates certain allegations 17,22,27
28 Evaluates certain allegations (many including 232-270)

30 Evaluates certain allegations 146
33 Meaning of Gupta declaration
34 invalid comparison to SCO's own discovery request
36 Evaluates certain allegations 146
45 Evaluates certain allegations 146
46 Evaluates certain allegations 146
50 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully
51 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully
52 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully
53 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully
54 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully
58 Reaches legal conclusion on meaning of Willfully


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "panglozz"
under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370154
Posted By: grokwars_must_end
Posted On: 2006-05-04 16:31:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 0
Rating: 0
Raters: 0

Are you stats_for_all posting under a new nym?


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"grokwars_must_end" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370227
Posted By: nobbutl
Posted On: 2006-05-04 18:42:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 3

grokwars_must_end: << Are you stats_for_all posting under a new nym? >>

Are you deepdistrust posting under another nym?


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "nobbutl"
under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370230
Posted By: grokwars_must_end
Posted On: 2006-05-04 18:54:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 0

"Are you stats_for_all posting under a new nym?"

What is wrong with my asking that question?


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"grokwars_must_end" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370235
Posted By: nobbutl
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:14:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 6

<< What is wrong with my asking that question? >>

Why do you avoid my question?

Why do you pretend I said that there was something wrong with your asking that question?

To save time, your next move will be to insist that you asked your question first, and then mine will be to say that I can't answer for panglozz, and then I will plonk you, and peace will reign once more.

Hey, let's skip the intermediate steps. No time like the present.


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "nobbutl"
under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370237
Posted By: diogenese19348
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:18:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 2

<<
"Are you stats_for_all posting under a new nym?"

What is wrong with my asking that question?

Nothing really, except the poster you were asking it of is another long term SCOX poster.

Panglozz has been around since 04/2005. I do admit the writing style is somewhat similar to stats, but there are some differences if you read through enough of them.

I think your guess is incorrect. These two posters are not the same person. Read the panglozz posts over time yourself, and I think you will see what I mean.

Personally, I do not think stats posts here as anybody but stats, but I could be wrong of course.


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"diogenese19348" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370239
Posted By: grokwars_must_end
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:23:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 1

"Are you deepdistrust posting under another nym?"

No. Why do you ask?


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"grokwars_must_end" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370246
Posted By: grokwars_must_end
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:35:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 2

"I think your guess is incorrect."

The reason I asked was due to reading this post on GL. http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20060504151748991&title=Para graphs and rationales listed&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=0#c43 7914

and then reading this post here. http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1600684464&tid=cald& sid=1600684464&mid=370128&thr=370107&cur=370145&dir=d

Thats it. No answer was forthcoming though.


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"grokwars_must_end" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370248
Posted By: diogenese19348
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:44:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 1

Reasonable question, though there is such a thing as "copy and paste".

To quote a comic book line "I have never seen stats and panglozz in the same place".

I have talked to stats though, and I have no reason to believe he would post something here under a different name he posted it on groklaw.

You have panglozz around, who is not answering the question. stats does not monitor this board constantly.

It would have been nice if panglozz would have at least attributed that passage. It is not like there are people here that do not read both boards.


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"diogenese19348" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370254
Posted By: diogenese19348
Posted On: 2006-05-04 19:56:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 0

<<
panglozz himself addressed this question recently. Nobody paid attention.

I don't constantly monitor the board at this point either. Can you point me to a message #?

I am curious...


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"diogenese19348" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370261
Posted By: jonathan_sizz
Posted On: 2006-05-04 20:06:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 1

<< Can you point me to a message #? >>

#360713


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"jonathan_sizz" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Message ID: 370267
Posted By: diogenese19348
Posted On: 2006-05-04 20:14:00
Subject: Re: SCO moves para + rationale list
Recs: 2

Thanks for the message #

Interesting.

I am going to have to figure out who panglozz reminds me of and why. It isn't stats, I am real sure of that.

On the other hand, I am pretty sure it is a nym of somebody else.

The game is afoot Flagon, gather up the hounds!


------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"diogenese19348" under the following license:

License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)