We bought new laptop (kept old including spare/slower, and interesting/ slowest with LibreBoot)... after installing/upgrading FreeBSD more times
on these, noticed something weird.
Fdisk was replaced by gpart... however uses different SSD/M2/NVMe
names than fstab--if one tries 'gpart show <device>' for device name
(without partition/slice) in fstab, gpart won't show (one does I haven't found how to show extended partitions, though can mount).
Is fact of not having same device names ahead of time in
design/plan/
standard, and the switch to git, evidence of switch to 'make up as you
go along' computer programming method used such as in GNU/Linux? It's
also known as waterfall versus agile software engineering methods or
'The Cathedral And The Bazaar'. I depended on UNIX/*BSD decades to be
more stable/clean including more understandable than much else, but (as
in case above, it's becoming less understandable so) maybe this is
slowly ending?
Fdisk was replaced by gpart...
however uses different SSD/M2/NVMe names than fstab--if one tries
'gpart show <device>' for device name (without partition/slice) in
fstab, gpart won't show (one does I haven't found how to show extended >partitions, though can mount).
Is fact of not having same device names ahead of time in design/plan/ >standard
NVMe disks are now nda devices by default, for example nda0; see
nda(4). Symbolic links for the previous nvd(4) device names are
created in /dev. However, configuration such as fstab(5) should be
updated to refer to the new device names. Options to control the use
of nda devices and symbolic links are described in nda(4).
bdc81eeda05d (Sponsored by Netflix)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 379 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 43:12:07 |
Calls: | 8,141 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,085 |
Messages: | 5,857,853 |