This is the PDF eBook version for Antibiotics - Challenges, Mechanisms, Opportunities by Walsh
This abusive spamtroll came from
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc #74958
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1547:b0:39c:804c:dc23 with SMTP id f7-
+ 20020a05600c154700b0039c804cdc23mr584035wmg.23.1656029552396;
+ Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e20c:0:b0:317:6f92:df2a with SMTP id
+ l12-20020a0de20c000000b003176f92df2amr13926994ywe.300.
+ 1656029551926; Thu, 23
+ Jun 2022 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.nk.ca!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.
+ proxad.net!209.85.128.88.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com! + postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=107.150.30.71;
+ posting-account=sOWXZQoAAAAGTOO5XFyr-r49rd7H6xeC NNTP-Posting-Host: 107.150.30.71
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bd4d7a69-cafa-4568-974b-38255ecb0e59n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: (PDF) Antibiotics - Challenges, Mechanisms, Opportunities by Walsh From: hester holt <hesterholt9@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:12:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: news.nk.ca comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:74958
Depeer Google groups Now!!
On Jun 23, 2022 at 7:27:39 PM CDT, "The Doctor" <The Doctor> wrote:
This abusive spamtroll came from
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc #74958
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1547:b0:39c:804c:dc23 with SMTP id f7-
+ 20020a05600c154700b0039c804cdc23mr584035wmg.23.1656029552396;
+ Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e20c:0:b0:317:6f92:df2a with SMTP id
+ l12-20020a0de20c000000b003176f92df2amr13926994ywe.300.
+ 1656029551926; Thu, 23
+ Jun 2022 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.nk.ca!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2. >> + proxad.net!209.85.128.88.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com! >> + postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=107.150.30.71; >> + posting-account=sOWXZQoAAAAGTOO5XFyr-r49rd7H6xeC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 107.150.30.71
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bd4d7a69-cafa-4568-974b-38255ecb0e59n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: (PDF) Antibiotics - Challenges, Mechanisms, Opportunities by Walsh >> From: hester holt <hesterholt9@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:12:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: news.nk.ca comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:74958
Depeer Google groups Now!!
It's easier to exclude them by adding their Path(s) to your "ME" newsfeeds >definition in INN, or use Diablo's "alias" directive inside the GLOBAL label.
Problems is that they are the worse offender with clout. They need
to made an example of.
On 6/23/22 9:38 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Problems is that they are the worse offender with clout. They need
to made an example of.
~chuckle~
Good luck with that.
Proportionally, Google probably sends out one of the lower percentages
of spam compared to other services. The problem is that even that small percentage applied to the huge number of messages they send means that
they volumetricly may send more spam than anyone else.
On Jun 23, 2022 at 11:26:25 PM CDT, "Grant Taylor" ><gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
On 6/23/22 9:38 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Problems is that they are the worse offender with clout. They need
to made an example of.
~chuckle~
Good luck with that.
Proportionally, Google probably sends out one of the lower percentages
of spam compared to other services. The problem is that even that small
percentage applied to the huge number of messages they send means that
they volumetricly may send more spam than anyone else.
I agree with Grant overall. When I look at what gets offered to me which I >consider true spam, excessive multi-posting/flooding, etc. most of it comes >from commercial providers. Today Google is more like AOL was when they brought >Usenet to the masses. Lots of useless "conversation", but not nearly as >'spammy' as I see coming from the resellers of HighWinds, for example.
I have a hunch most text-only peers who don't get close to high volume >injection points have no idea the amount of spam that gets filtered from those >guys before they get a chance to be offered the articles. All the 'floods' >I've witnessed lately originate from operations in the Netherlands. >Auto-uploaders and spam bots are in heavy use behind those injection points.
When I wasn't peered with commercial providers I saw much less, and admit that >Google did account for most of the hits Cleanfeed and pyClean identified. >However, when you get a bigger picture of Usenet as a whole, they are a tiny >fraction of 'the problem'.
On 6/23/22 9:38 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Problems is that they are the worse offender with clout. They need
to made an example of.
~chuckle~
Good luck with that.
Proportionally, Google probably sends out one of the lower percentages
of spam compared to other services. The problem is that even that small >percentage applied to the huge number of messages they send means that
they volumetricly may send more spam than anyone else.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
IF Google were using fiulters, most of their spam customers would disappear.
On 6/24/22 8:42 AM, The Doctor wrote:
IF Google were using fiulters, most of their spam customers would disappear.
I think that Google filters /inbound/ messages. So if you're inside and sending something /outbound/, you're probably okay as far as Google is concerned.
I'm a very big advocate of filtering /inbound/ *and* /outbound/ messages.
Granted, this is mostly a mentality for email, but applies to news too.
On Jun 24, 2022 at 10:53:57 AM CDT, "Grant Taylor" in ><t94mm0$h2k$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
On 6/24/22 8:42 AM, The Doctor wrote:
IF Google were using fiulters, most of their spam customers would disappear.
I think that Google filters /inbound/ messages. So if you're inside and
sending something /outbound/, you're probably okay as far as Google is
concerned.
I'm a very big advocate of filtering /inbound/ *and* /outbound/ messages.
Granted, this is mostly a mentality for email, but applies to news too.
Best I can tell, they only do basic rate-limiting after X number of posts. >Most of the prolific spammers using Google take a long time to get cut off and >move to another account, but that does seem to happen too.
On 6/24/22 8:42 AM, The Doctor wrote:
IF Google were using fiulters, most of their spam customers would disappear.
I think that Google filters /inbound/ messages. So if you're inside and >sending something /outbound/, you're probably okay as far as Google is >concerned.
I'm a very big advocate of filtering /inbound/ *and* /outbound/ messages.
Granted, this is mostly a mentality for email, but applies to news too.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 379 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 43:09:19 |
| Calls: | 8,141 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 13,085 |
| Messages: | 5,857,853 |