What's the determining factor in the UI for pdfs on the web?
What's the determining factor in the UI for pdfs on the web?xpost/downloads/detail?name=spiral-fill.pdf&can=2&q=
OTOH it must be the server. For pdfs served up by an archive eg.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160404161549/https://code.google.com/p/
You have to just download it. But for other pdfs, served up as part of a "document-service" (for want of more informed terminology) can feed a
bit of needed pre-parsed metadata that the browser plug-in can chug
with. eg.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.06640v1.pdf
And for a specially-powered few of these "document service"
httpd extension suites, it can feed the xref tables first (which lie physically at the *end* of the pdf file) enabling the plugin to start displaying page 1 as soon as its elements are present. eg.
http://algorithmicbotany.org/papers/abop/abop.lowquality.pdf
And still-more-powerful systems like GitHub can even wrap their own html around it. eg.
https://github.com/luser-dr00g/ibis.ps/blob/master/ibis.pdf
Am I right? Apache packages?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 224:32:44 |
Calls: | 6,623 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,171 |
Messages: | 5,318,481 |