XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> asked

Indeed you can even watch with Ubuntu the list of bugs

In other words, Chris agrees Apple OS's are no better than any other OS.
(They are simply less functional and more expensive - but just as buggy.)

It's interesting that when a Ubuntu bug is covered in the linux newsgroup, absolutely_nobody_ blames Apple for those Ubuntu bugs both found & fixed.

*It's _only_ on Apple newsgroups apologists blame Canonical for Apple bugs.*

Worse, the apologists want to have it both ways:
a. Apologists claim the Apple code is _more secure_ than is Ubuntu code;
b. Yet, when Apple has holes, it's Ubuntu's fault Apple code isn't tested.

Notice apologists always try to have it both ways - which can't be logical.
--
Nobody in high tech spends LESS in R&D than Apple (nor more in Marketing).

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Robin Goodfellow <Ancient-of-Days@Heaven.Net> wrote:

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> asked

Indeed you can even watch with Ubuntu the list of bugs

In other words, Chris agrees Apple OS's are no better than any other OS.

There you go conflicting opinion with fact. Factually they are no different
in terms of not being bug free. Whether they are better is a matter of
opinion.

(They are simply less functional and more expensive - but just as buggy.)

Apple's OSes are all free.

It's interesting that when a Ubuntu bug is covered in the linux newsgroup, absolutely_nobody_ blames Apple for those Ubuntu bugs both found & fixed.

*It's _only_ on Apple newsgroups apologists blame Canonical for Apple bugs.*

Worse, the apologists want to have it both ways:
a. Apologists claim the Apple code is _more secure_ than is Ubuntu code;
b. Yet, when Apple has holes, it's Ubuntu's fault Apple code isn't tested.

You'd be funny if it wasn't embarrassing.

Notice apologists always try to have it both ways - which can't be logical.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> asked

Factually they are no different
in terms of not being bug free. Whether they are better is a matter of opinion.

*Apologists mirror Apple in blaming everyone but Apple for Apple's flaws*.
a. Nobody on the Windows newsgroup blames Apple for Microsoft flaws.
b. Nobody on the Android newsgroup blames Apple for Google's flaws.
c. Nobody on the Linux newsgroup blames Apple for Canonical's flaws.

It's only on the childish Apple newsgroup that you apologists constantly and repeatedly blame everyone but Apple for the many flaws in Apple's software.
--
Apologists mirror Apple in blaming everyone but Apple for Apple's own flaws.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Robin Goodfellow <Ancient-of-Days@Heaven.Net> wrote:

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> asked

Factually they are no different
in terms of not being bug free. Whether they are better is a matter of
opinion.

*Apologists mirror Apple in blaming everyone but Apple for Apple's flaws*.

You're mistaken Apple has no flaws :p

a. Nobody on the Windows newsgroup blames Apple for Microsoft flaws.
b. Nobody on the Android newsgroup blames Apple for Google's flaws.
c. Nobody on the Linux newsgroup blames Apple for Canonical's flaws.

It's only on the childish Apple newsgroup that you apologists constantly and repeatedly blame everyone but Apple for the many flaws in Apple's software.

Said no-one other than you.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)