• Steven Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot is a racist

    From Ann Glaser@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 28 13:29:40 2022
    Being self-governed as it is, usenet will never go away but it'll never
    be well known. Now let's see, who knows AppleScript, is an avid scripter,
    has hacked -hh's ID, has motive and is a colossal whining toddler who,
    when he backs himself into a corner, posts endless nonsense even when he's *not* flooding... AND... who tries to blame everything *he* is doing on "others" and has for years?

    Any dreadfully moronic insomniac could easily do the same. It should not
    matter because the FROM line on a post does not matter, it's the content
    that counts. The text of the post is a bunch of rambling William Poaster-
    like crap. Which means... My stance: Even if you were barely learning
    to annoy others, the notion that acquiring know-how as being one of having "diddly" to show for it does not follow because you will by definition
    have the wisdom to show for it and intelligence is an advantage in life.
    Dustin Cook: functionally illiterate fraud.


    --
    One Smart Penny! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustin the dude with the stuck flop@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 6 22:35:35 2022
    The guy is as loved as pork pie in a mosque -- and with good cause. No
    one who isn't just using you for criminal purposes sees you as anything remotely close to decent. You have no one but Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot to credit for that.

    Plenty of advocates keep replying to Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot.
    I don't chide Snit Michael Glasser for his fury but, in the end, I can
    not conceive why he posts here at all. Snit Michael Glasser is hoping for discussions as found in a technical forum and free forums will just lead
    to frustration.


    --
    Top Six Ways Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot Trolls!! https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud Dustin Cook the Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Smit@21:1/5 to Smit on Mon Mar 7 01:13:15 2022
    On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 2:29:45 PM UTC-7, Smit wrote:
    Being self-governed as it is, usenet will never go away but it'll never
    be well known. Now let's see, who knows AppleScript, is an avid scripter,
    has hacked -hh's ID, has motive and is a colossal whining toddler who,
    when he backs himself into a corner, posts endless nonsense even when he's *not* flooding... AND... who tries to blame everything *he* is doing on "others" and has for years?

    Any dreadfully moronic insomniac could easily do the same. It should not matter because the FROM line on a post does not matter, it's the content
    that counts. The text of the post is a bunch of rambling William Poaster- like crap. Which means... My stance: Even if you were barely learning
    to annoy others, the notion that acquiring know-how as being one of having "diddly" to show for it does not follow because you will by definition
    have the wisdom to show for it and intelligence is an advantage in life. Dustin Cook: functionally illiterate fraud.


    --
    One Smart Penny! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud


    Snit buddy chrisv's essentially misleading William Poaster to keep feeding
    him by trying to 'develop websites', specifically, his weak skills and
    William Poaster's efforts to help him become a better scripter. He needs attention, and as long as you're willing to continue play his game, he'll remain. Those who know Snit buddy chrisv's posts knows it's not generated
    in the manner William Poaster is implying, and many of them are of course
    hand written.

    Reviewing Linux... still a novice...

    Gee, what was your first cluebyfour? The ones which claimed it was and
    that are unambigiously using faulty algorithm to make the determination,
    or was it something else? Please do be clear. I've been reading a bit from
    some of those old threads he was previously running from. I noticed that
    many of those he would go out of his way to repeatedly attack had extensive high-tech knowledge. I didn't find many who were also adept in the hardware side of things, or were also trained as an programmer along with various aspects of IT; with the degrees to back it all up, too.


    --
    My Snoring Solution https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/1975_annual_meeting_program.pdf Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Smit Michael Glaser@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 23 03:13:18 2022
    Sooner or later, if you bother to read... you'd see that Larry Washington's plan is to 'offhandedly' incite people and then play 'fool'. That is the problem today and newer pupils don't have a clue, people from older generations *should* know better than to fall for communism. Larry Washington doesn't
    have any idea what he is sniveling about.

    LOL! How did Larry Washington get so conceited he concludes everything
    is about his comments?? Of course, the only undertaking that is important
    to Larry Washington is appearing "moral", and if he can not have that
    he will do more research to desperately slap FromTheRafters down... he's
    been that way for decades.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified! https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22 https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud https://redd.it/6sfhq6
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 6 04:54:57 2022
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
    number:

    <XnsAC34A629C8F3DHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32ADC5A8EECHT1@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62CD62DDHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62EE3F39HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62ACDF8HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62A42D90HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D794DE5AD5HT1@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C66D49387HT1@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212DEE4D1DCHT1@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC21106DF6C20HT1@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Sat May 7 11:59:19 2022
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot


    He would have to be suffering from a form of insanity to be unsure of whether or not he "rarely had" built a program. When someone can't be consistent
    with his story and applies make-believe, self-esteem protecting rot later,
    it's mighty obvious what his trick is.

    A shadow of false observation, projected spontaneously, at the wrong time.
    It's a simple fact when David automatically uses the word 'bigot' the way
    the MSM does, to the point where the word stops sounding like a word. The
    link to another one of David's trolling accounts, no doubt. At some point
    Steve Carroll will realize his 'buddy' is lying to him, too.


    -
    Do not click this link! https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Dustin Cook the Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Sun May 8 03:08:36 2022
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot


    Steven Petruzzellis: Narcissistic Bigot. Do you even believe the idiocy
    Larry Washington is pushing?

    Larry Washington continues to tap dance around the harassment claim he
    wrote about me, even after Kelly Phillips clearly verified that he KNOWS
    HE LIED about it. The only way that I could forgive AZ Cypher's constant
    need for tinkering because of dependency problems or badly written features
    is if I enjoyed the steady supply of Kool Aid flavors its ads have been
    pushing since 1981.

    At times, a make believe world is more valuable than facts. I will not
    ask Larry Washington how any part of Kelly Phillips's body tastes no matter
    how regularly Larry Washington kisses it. Larry Washington is five seconds
    away from being in everyone's kill file.


    -
    Best CMS Solution of 2017
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Snit Michael Glasser on Sun May 8 05:01:15 2022
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 11:59:22 AM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
    He would have to be suffering from a form of insanity to be unsure of whether
    or not he "rarely had" built a program. When someone can't be consistent with his story and applies make-believe, self-esteem protecting rot later, it's mighty obvious what his trick is.

    A shadow of false observation, projected spontaneously, at the wrong time. It's a simple fact when David automatically uses the word 'bigot' the way the MSM does, to the point where the word stops sounding like a word. The link to another one of David's trolling accounts, no doubt. At some point Steve Carroll will realize his 'buddy' is lying to him, too.


    -
    Do not click this link! https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Dustin Cook the Fraud


    What is Doomsdrzej's system for the flooding nonsense? mySQL? That is
    the only tool he knows, and it is a joke. He must be programming it to
    create these annoying "obsession" threads. Educated hypothesis, Doomsdrzej took a PGP program that he pirated and pretended was his... he's feeding
    it content from this group, grabbing "special" paragraphs, then scrambling those using the Baum–Welch method and then he annoyingly posts them because his obsessiveness enables him to do that almost ceaselessly. Like most everyone else in this group, Doomsdrzej relies on biased science to concoct his opinions on the news. As a result, he only knows and speaks of the endorsed stories which also happens to be the ones which represent liberals
    in a very favorable and principled slant.

    It's a fact when Doomsdrzej frequently uses the word 'shill' the way
    the deep state does, to the point where the word gets am ironic innuendo.

    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!! https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22 <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate@21:1/5 to Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate on Mon May 9 00:26:42 2022
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 11:59:22 AM UTC-7, Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud wrote:
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
    He would have to be suffering from a form of insanity to be unsure of whether or not he "rarely had" built a program. When someone can't be consistent
    with his story and applies make-believe, self-esteem protecting rot later, it's mighty obvious what his trick is.

    A shadow of false observation, projected spontaneously, at the wrong time. It's a simple fact when David automatically uses the word 'bigot' the way
    the MSM does, to the point where the word stops sounding like a word. The link to another one of David's trolling accounts, no doubt. At some point Steve Carroll will realize his 'buddy' is lying to him, too.


    -
    Do not click this link! https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Dustin Cook the Fraud


    Wolffan - who caused more problems applying his 'band-aids' than what the
    box started with before he touched it. Wolffan refuses to takes blame for
    his own posts. Words that are easily seen to be trolling. From what I've
    seen it looks like the trolling nonsense got more sophisticated.

    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Wolffan automates them: https://youtu.be/hYQ4Tg0r0g0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From STALKING_TARGET_20@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 10 04:23:34 2022
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, STALKING_TARGET_20 wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot


    Kelly Phillips can not help but know everyone knows he is just lying! The person you are thinking of is in my kill filter. "Somewhere between 1992
    or 2007 I trusted Snit, the fully absurd liar" - Kelly Phillips.

    What amazing searches <https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>
    or <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    Even this works for Dustin Cook: <https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22>
    Snit shared a specific series of urls several times now, and invited Kelly Phillips to show which ones aren't accurate and provide the evidence to
    support his assertion. Not one single time has Kelly Phillips done so.

    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretwizzer@gmail.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Petruzzellis - fretwizer@21:1/5 to Steve Petruzzellis - fretwizer on Tue May 10 10:00:08 2022
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 3:08:38 AM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzellis - fretwizer wrote:
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
    Steven Petruzzellis: Narcissistic Bigot. Do you even believe the idiocy
    Larry Washington is pushing?

    Larry Washington continues to tap dance around the harassment claim he
    wrote about me, even after Kelly Phillips clearly verified that he KNOWS
    HE LIED about it. The only way that I could forgive AZ Cypher's constant
    need for tinkering because of dependency problems or badly written features is if I enjoyed the steady supply of Kool Aid flavors its ads have been pushing since 1981.

    At times, a make believe world is more valuable than facts. I will not
    ask Larry Washington how any part of Kelly Phillips's body tastes no matter how regularly Larry Washington kisses it. Larry Washington is five seconds away from being in everyone's kill file.


    -
    Best CMS Solution of 2017
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Just Wondering claims to be the macOS professor, let's see him put up
    a form but lacking the pre-made constructs. You are as dumb as a shoe.

    Jeff Relf can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to
    shreds! Are you being like Just Wondering on purpose? Off Just Wondering
    goes to the tranquility in the teeming sewer of my kill filter.


    --
    One Smart Penny! https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steven Carrolll@21:1/5 to Steven Carrolll on Wed May 11 00:24:26 2022
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 5:01:18 AM UTC-7, Steven Carrolll wrote:
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 11:59:22 AM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
    He would have to be suffering from a form of insanity to be unsure of whether
    or not he "rarely had" built a program. When someone can't be consistent with his story and applies make-believe, self-esteem protecting rot later, it's mighty obvious what his trick is.

    A shadow of false observation, projected spontaneously, at the wrong time. It's a simple fact when David automatically uses the word 'bigot' the way the MSM does, to the point where the word stops sounding like a word. The link to another one of David's trolling accounts, no doubt. At some point Steve Carroll will realize his 'buddy' is lying to him, too.


    -
    Do not click this link! https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud Dustin Cook the Fraud
    What is Doomsdrzej's system for the flooding nonsense? mySQL? That is
    the only tool he knows, and it is a joke. He must be programming it to create these annoying "obsession" threads. Educated hypothesis, Doomsdrzej took a PGP program that he pirated and pretended was his... he's feeding
    it content from this group, grabbing "special" paragraphs, then scrambling those using the Baum–Welch method and then he annoyingly posts them because
    his obsessiveness enables him to do that almost ceaselessly. Like most everyone else in this group, Doomsdrzej relies on biased science to concoct his opinions on the news. As a result, he only knows and speaks of the endorsed stories which also happens to be the ones which represent liberals in a very favorable and principled slant.

    It's a fact when Doomsdrzej frequently uses the word 'shill' the way
    the deep state does, to the point where the word gets am ironic innuendo.

    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!! https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22 <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot


    What do you get out of lying, Silver Slimer? How many more chances does Silver Slimer's senseless ass (a worm knows more than Silver Slimer and is useful) need to prove their Shadow lying accusation with links?

    Why do you keep rephrasing yourself?

    Lines of text containing quotes you somehow recognize but can not place.

    Where did Silver Slimer go to school?

    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://redd.it/6sfhq6
    Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 13 12:03:07 2022
    Nobody is being controlled by Commander Kinsey. "Now that was close" said Digger Thomnson's girlfriend. Windows Mobile, runs on the Linux kernel.
    So yeah, Linux is mobile. Linux is a super computer. Linux is a server.
    Linux is a desktop. Linux is growing in market share.

    Avira was initially designed and back linked using a bootleg copy of MonoDevelop,
    in Ada. Obviously, the lone thought that is important to Digger Thomnson
    is being "professional", and if he can not have that he will post more evidence to successfully slap Commander Kinsey down, effectively killing every group
    he goes to.


    -
    Top Six Ways Digger Thomnson Trolls
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stefen Carroll - fretwizen@21:1/5 to Stefen Carroll - fretwizen on Fri May 13 14:11:53 2022
    On Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 4:23:36 AM UTC-7, Stefen Carroll - fretwizen wrote:
    On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 4:55:00 AM UTC-7, STALKING_TARGET_20 wrote:
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    My Snoring Solution!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
    Kelly Phillips can not help but know everyone knows he is just lying! The person you are thinking of is in my kill filter. "Somewhere between 1992
    or 2007 I trusted Snit, the fully absurd liar" - Kelly Phillips.

    What amazing searches <https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>
    or <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    Even this works for Dustin Cook: <https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22>
    Snit shared a specific series of urls several times now, and invited Kelly Phillips to show which ones aren't accurate and provide the evidence to support his assertion. Not one single time has Kelly Phillips done so.

    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretw...@gmail.com


    That is the problem today and less experienced educators don't stand a
    chance, people from earlier generations *should* know better than to fall
    for liberalism. Mike Easter's posts are nothing but a senseless prattle.
    It is obvious at least some of the posts are hand generated because some
    of them tap into what Snit said in very specific ways with attempts to
    mislead on specific issues, not just gibberish.

    Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends
    most of his time whining about "obsession".

    I want Mike Easter to support her socking accusation. Let's see the proof
    Mike Easter. When I accused Mike Easter of flooding as Snit I actually supported it with links. Thanks to Mike Easter and his 'convenient friends'
    you now need a go / no-go list (which I configured for 3d printers and
    Windows Mail). Take a look, by and large I lately stopped giving him tons
    of attention (even though I want to). If people start attacking him again
    I will slip in my resolve... as I promised. I'm referring to good people
    here, not drive by loons, who never do as we want anyway.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretwizzer@gmail.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)