• Sandman's invalid CSS:

    From Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 18 15:26:10 2022
    Why is Steve Carroll a Narcissistic Bigot?

    Frankly I do not really think you understand. What is your evidence?
    Who doesn't know that this kind of hot air is Nospam's modus operandi,
    not the approach of Snit? It's all just nonsense... the endless posting,
    the posting with Snit's name, the writing of word-twisted nonsense, the outbursts... the puffy red eyes and willingness to show how distressed
    he is over being kicked from the sandbox for crapping in it again...
    all of it. It's simple to distort the truth by focusing on a handful
    of special cases different from what is typical. What is more important
    from an honest advocates standpoint are the average usages.

    It was Nospam who flooded Snit's site dozens of times and denied it.
    Why would Snit need shills? He's the one who provides facts for his side
    of the "fights".


    --
    I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Petruzellis@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 20:38:28 2022
    At times, an inner world is more valuable than truth.

    A persistent, fierce, posting itch, regardless of content - essentially
    gunky Mac-using lawyers, and well-lubricated sheep, tied up with ropes
    for his own individual purposes.

    The only way that I could overlook AZ Code's constant need for maintenance because of programing troubles or buggy design flaws is if I consumed
    the constant supply of fantasies its developers have been pushing since
    2016. Dropping support for anything Ronb uses is needed for progress.

    I suspect we have two different ideas entirely.

    Snit Glasser Michael must have read Ronb doxing files and became awfully
    butt hurt. I suspect this is our first demonstration of the improved Snit Glasser Michael.


    -
    What Every Entrepreneur Must Know! <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 7 21:47:52 2022
    Why do you think Nospam is trying to babysit Theo? Even he sees his nonsense. He can't comment on *any* of the stuff I quote because he sees it's proved.
    Do you have a Network+ certification?

    Theo and Nospam both lie nonstop and shamelessly and continue to do so.
    So no point in showing any further courtesy or control. "Somewhere between
    1996 or 2007 I trusted Nospam, the completely angry liar" - Theo.

    My uptime is almost thirty-eight weeks and OS X is still going strong!
    Where did Theo go to school?

    Theo can not help but grasp everyone knows he is just trolling!

    -
    This broke the Internet! https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From STALKING_TARGET_12@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 8 04:44:47 2022
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 9:47:55 PM UTC-7, STALKING_TARGET_12 wrote:
    Why do you think Nospam is trying to babysit Theo? Even he sees his nonsense. He can't comment on *any* of the stuff I quote because he sees it's proved. Do you have a Network+ certification?

    Theo and Nospam both lie nonstop and shamelessly and continue to do so.
    So no point in showing any further courtesy or control. "Somewhere between 1996 or 2007 I trusted Nospam, the completely angry liar" - Theo.

    My uptime is almost thirty-eight weeks and OS X is still going strong!
    Where did Theo go to school?

    Theo can not help but grasp everyone knows he is just trolling!

    -
    This broke the Internet! https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud


    Real discussion will not be seen once the druggies overindulge. That, and
    there will forever be a temper tantrum or two in an open news group (i.e. Prescott Computer Guy). The comedy of errors aside, we've all seen who usually lashes out when he does not get his way. You're like a bowling pin in a needle-stack. We all see you hiding there and tell you as much. And you're
    so foolish you keep rejecting it. From what I've seen it looks like the
    OS X ecosystem needs more and more resources.

    It's the same pattern that happens in every group Prescott Computer Guy invades.

    --
    One Smart Penny https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU
    Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stefen Carrolll - frelwizen@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 12 15:49:33 2022
    Snit's computer has more hard drives than Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey's.
    Snit wins. Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey loses. Nothing LCD about it. Nobody gets it, I don't get it. He would have to be afflicted with dementia to
    be unsure of if he "once had" built a website. Ring any bells? When someone can't keep his lies straight and makes use of bogus, self-esteem protecting
    hot air later, it's acutely obvious what his ploy is. Several people keep replying to Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey. To be honest, I don't criticize
    Snit for his animosity but I can not understand why he writes here with Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey here. Snit is more interested in discussions
    as found in a BBS group and trolling environments bother him too much.



    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-Winthrops- VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Petruzzellis - frelwizen@21:1/5 to Steve Petruzzellis - frelwizen on Fri May 13 02:43:23 2022
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 9:47:55 PM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzellis - frelwizen wrote:
    Why do you think Nospam is trying to babysit Theo? Even he sees his nonsense. He can't comment on *any* of the stuff I quote because he sees it's proved. Do you have a Network+ certification?

    Theo and Nospam both lie nonstop and shamelessly and continue to do so.
    So no point in showing any further courtesy or control. "Somewhere between 1996 or 2007 I trusted Nospam, the completely angry liar" - Theo.

    My uptime is almost thirty-eight weeks and OS X is still going strong!
    Where did Theo go to school?

    Theo can not help but grasp everyone knows he is just trolling!

    -
    This broke the Internet! https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud


    I quoted examples of Toasty flat out making things up -- failing to rise
    up and instead putting others down, etc. His response: to repeat the same nonsense.

    Do you even believe the lies Toasty is spewing?

    Try these: <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    And <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    You can do even just this: <https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22>
    "Somewhere between 1997 or 2002 I trusted Peeler, the absolutely absurd
    liar" - Toasty.

    By following 'lawyers' like that you get laws like 'reverse racism'.
    Carried to its (il)logical solution, the media position that it's 'partisan' for a hetero human to not wish to screw a child is instituted. Toasty's essentially snowing Peeler to keep feeding him by trying to 'produce screen casts', specifically, his poor code and Peeler's efforts to help him become
    a better programmer. He needs recognition, and as long as you are willing
    to continue happily give it, he'll remain.


    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steven Carroll - fretwizer@21:1/5 to Steven Carroll - fretwizer on Fri May 13 05:07:26 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 2:43:25 AM UTC-7, Steven Carroll - fretwizer wrote:
    On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 9:47:55 PM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzellis - frelwizen wrote:
    Why do you think Nospam is trying to babysit Theo? Even he sees his nonsense.
    He can't comment on *any* of the stuff I quote because he sees it's proved. Do you have a Network+ certification?

    Theo and Nospam both lie nonstop and shamelessly and continue to do so.
    So no point in showing any further courtesy or control. "Somewhere between 1996 or 2007 I trusted Nospam, the completely angry liar" - Theo.

    My uptime is almost thirty-eight weeks and OS X is still going strong! Where did Theo go to school?

    Theo can not help but grasp everyone knows he is just trolling!

    -
    This broke the Internet! https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud
    I quoted examples of Toasty flat out making things up -- failing to rise
    up and instead putting others down, etc. His response: to repeat the same nonsense.

    Do you even believe the lies Toasty is spewing?

    Try these: <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    And <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    You can do even just this: <https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22>
    "Somewhere between 1997 or 2002 I trusted Peeler, the absolutely absurd
    liar" - Toasty.

    By following 'lawyers' like that you get laws like 'reverse racism'.
    Carried to its (il)logical solution, the media position that it's 'partisan' for a hetero human to not wish to screw a child is instituted. Toasty's essentially snowing Peeler to keep feeding him by trying to 'produce screen casts', specifically, his poor code and Peeler's efforts to help him become
    a better programmer. He needs recognition, and as long as you are willing
    to continue happily give it, he'll remain.


    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud


    Contrary to Gregory Hall's claim that he has "no enthusiasm in making enemies" (a lie as illustrated by the fact that he posts over 1000 times a month)
    he was quoted asking support staff how they would install a virus remotely.

    Effectively everything Gregory Hall says about Snit is a lie but he thinks
    he is fooling people.

    Gregory Hall and the other trolls insist searching for advice for an open source application is instigating.

    The one thing Gregory Hall learned sufficiently is to work to humiliate
    Snit into back peddling and if that doesn't work, troll-splain or dishonesty change the assertion.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/postingtimes/Snit/Flooding

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Carrolll 4705@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 19 10:55:59 2022
    I think the point is not really to get Snit to listen to him. The point
    is likely to piss me off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent.

    I'm not going to pretend Snit did not give me good advice on image editing
    and I acknowledge his advice. Shadow has my example as an example and
    can start to act as if he has a clue from now on ;) What did you assume
    from the lying imbecile? That Shadow dolt has nothing to lose but time.
    He has nothing else, especially not a job.

    --
    Do not click this link! https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Snit Michael Glasser on Thu May 19 22:42:06 2022
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:49:35 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    Snit's computer has more hard drives than Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey's. Snit wins. Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey loses. Nothing LCD about it. Nobody gets it, I don't get it. He would have to be afflicted with dementia to
    be unsure of if he "once had" built a website. Ring any bells? When someone can't keep his lies straight and makes use of bogus, self-esteem protecting hot air later, it's acutely obvious what his ploy is. Several people keep replying to Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey. To be honest, I don't criticize Snit for his animosity but I can not understand why he writes here with Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey here. Snit is more interested in discussions
    as found in a BBS group and trolling environments bother him too much.



    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-Winthrops-
    VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
    No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----
    No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
    By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
    is.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
    Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
    Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.

    Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
    you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

    Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
    hard to hack these days.

    So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

    But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
    two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
    and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
    he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
    The "hacker" got one post in.

    But Carroll could not leave his story there.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
    Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
    to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
    must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
    have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.

    This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

    Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
    hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
    He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
    the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
    where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
    one!

    He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
    one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
    He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
    done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
    mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
    he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
    than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
    a lie. Proved.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
    What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
    they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

    Just nonsense.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
    8ZYUnwJ
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
    But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
    alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
    So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
    - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
    using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
    way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
    is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.

    Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
    it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
    one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
    the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
    this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
    where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
    change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
    Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.

    The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

    My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
    figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason.
    -----
    Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
    *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

    I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
    Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
    is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
    and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
    is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
    make *no* sense at all.

    Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
    Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
    to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
    Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
    says they did.

    Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
    he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
    Why has he not said anything about this?

    My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
    and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
    was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

    This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
    like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
    Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

    His story changes with the telling.

    But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
    to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account.
    -----
    Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
    the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
    in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
    basic look stays the same.

    He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
    pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
    I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
    but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
    for certain?

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----

    No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
    Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----

    Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----

    A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
    A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
    More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

    Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----

    No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-show- https-and-not-http https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Snit Michael Glasser on Thu May 19 23:46:04 2022
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 10:42:09 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:49:35 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    Snit's computer has more hard drives than Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey's. Snit wins. Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey loses. Nothing LCD about it. Nobody
    gets it, I don't get it. He would have to be afflicted with dementia to
    be unsure of if he "once had" built a website. Ring any bells? When someone
    can't keep his lies straight and makes use of bogus, self-esteem protecting
    hot air later, it's acutely obvious what his ploy is. Several people keep replying to Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey. To be honest, I don't criticize Snit for his animosity but I can not understand why he writes here with Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey here. Snit is more interested in discussions as found in a BBS group and trolling environments bother him too much.



    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-Winthrops-
    VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
    Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
    No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----
    No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
    By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
    is.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
    Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.

    Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
    you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

    Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
    hard to hack these days.

    So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

    But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
    two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
    and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
    he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
    The "hacker" got one post in.

    But Carroll could not leave his story there.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
    Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
    must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.

    This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

    Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
    hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
    the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
    where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
    one!

    He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
    one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
    He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
    done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
    mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
    he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
    a lie. Proved.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
    What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

    Just nonsense.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
    8ZYUnwJ
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
    But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
    alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
    So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
    - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
    is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.

    Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
    it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
    the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
    this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
    where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
    Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
    and "forgers" which do not even exist.

    The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
    café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

    My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason.
    -----
    Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

    I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
    is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
    is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

    Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
    Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
    to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
    Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

    Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
    he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
    Why has he not said anything about this?

    My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
    and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
    was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

    This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
    like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
    Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

    His story changes with the telling.

    But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
    to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
    tried it with me.

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account.
    -----
    Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
    the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
    in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

    He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
    I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
    but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
    for certain?

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----

    No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----

    Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----

    A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
    A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
    More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

    Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----

    No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-show- https-and-not-http https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll


    It was Theo who flooded Shadow's site thousands of times and pretended
    he did not do it.

    Translation: "Theo" is now *altogether* unable to camouflage his trolling. Theo is trying to project their modus operandi onto Shadow. For as long
    as I can remember Theo has spurred the belief that Shadow needs 'documentation'
    to point out all his forgeries. The fact is that no one needs any reason
    to do that. So Theo pulls this insane blaming crap in a sickly effort
    to 'peddle' the idea that Shadow is like he is. Those who know this thread knows the flood bot is not created in the way Shadow is thinking, and
    most of them are flat out manually written.

    <giggle>


    -
    Puppy Videos!!
    https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustic Cook the Fucntionally Illite@21:1/5 to Dustic Cook the Fucntionally Illite on Fri May 20 02:26:20 2022
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 10:56:02 AM UTC-7, Dustic Cook the Fucntionally Illiterate Fraud wrote:
    I think the point is not really to get Snit to listen to him. The point
    is likely to piss me off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent.

    I'm not going to pretend Snit did not give me good advice on image editing and I acknowledge his advice. Shadow has my example as an example and
    can start to act as if he has a clue from now on ;) What did you assume
    from the lying imbecile? That Shadow dolt has nothing to lose but time.
    He has nothing else, especially not a job.

    --
    Do not click this link! https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prZeTJKpc3Y
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot


    Just look at Ryan Sullivan's videos and look at Snit's, there is nothing
    for me to learn from a mindless moron like Ryan Sullivan. But so be it,
    let him keep making a dolt of himself. He can make another sock to pat himself on the back. I want Ryan Sullivan to support her spamming accusation. Let's
    see the evidence Ryan Sullivan. When I accused Ryan Sullivan of doxing as
    Snit I actually supported it with evidence. Generally, Snit wouldn't call
    a post like Ryan Sullivan's comments a fabrication right up until you invalidate
    it (as you are here) and Ryan Sullivan responds with the distraction knowing
    he can't prove it. No no. Ryan Sullivan never agreed to stop flooding. He
    lied about his trolling just as you would expect. Any heinously wounded
    welfare receiver could easily do the same.

    Ryan Sullivan is commonly seen declaring "THERE IS NO" when it comes to
    data on the web where information is easy to find... but Ryan Sullivan is
    just too dimwitted or lazy to deduce any advice... or he doesn't recognize
    it as advice when he does find it. What's the group coming to when a Ryan Sullivan troll can not get any responses?

    --
    Top Six Ways Ryan Sullivan Trolls! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 http://www.phmc.state.pa.us/bah/dam/rg/di/r11_089_BirthIndexes/Birth_1909/M.PDF Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen@21:1/5 to Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen on Fri May 20 10:24:03 2022
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 11:46:07 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen wrote:
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 10:42:09 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:49:35 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    Snit's computer has more hard drives than Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey's.
    Snit wins. Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey loses. Nothing LCD about it. Nobody
    gets it, I don't get it. He would have to be afflicted with dementia to be unsure of if he "once had" built a website. Ring any bells? When someone
    can't keep his lies straight and makes use of bogus, self-esteem protecting
    hot air later, it's acutely obvious what his ploy is. Several people keep
    replying to Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey. To be honest, I don't criticize
    Snit for his animosity but I can not understand why he writes here with Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey here. Snit is more interested in discussions
    as found in a BBS group and trolling environments bother him too much.



    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-Winthrops-
    VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
    Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
    No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----
    No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
    By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
    is.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
    Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.

    Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
    in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

    Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days.

    So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

    But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
    he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in.

    But Carroll could not leave his story there.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
    Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
    to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.

    This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

    Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
    the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

    He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
    one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
    He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
    he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
    a lie. Proved.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
    What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
    someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

    Just nonsense.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
    8ZYUnwJ
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
    But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
    is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
    So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
    - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
    information so the hacker would not know.

    Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
    it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
    Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
    and "forgers" which do not even exist.

    The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
    café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

    My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
    about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
    his lies are. :)

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason.
    -----
    Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

    I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

    Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
    Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
    to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
    Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

    Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
    he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
    Why has he not said anything about this?

    My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
    and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

    This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
    Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

    His story changes with the telling.

    But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
    to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
    tried it with me.

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account.
    -----
    Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
    the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
    interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
    in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

    He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
    I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
    for certain?

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----

    No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----

    Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----

    A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
    A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
    More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

    Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----

    No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-show- https-and-not-http https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll
    It was Theo who flooded Shadow's site thousands of times and pretended
    he did not do it.

    Translation: "Theo" is now *altogether* unable to camouflage his trolling. Theo is trying to project their modus operandi onto Shadow. For as long
    as I can remember Theo has spurred the belief that Shadow needs 'documentation'
    to point out all his forgeries. The fact is that no one needs any reason
    to do that. So Theo pulls this insane blaming crap in a sickly effort
    to 'peddle' the idea that Shadow is like he is. Those who know this thread knows the flood bot is not created in the way Shadow is thinking, and
    most of them are flat out manually written.

    <giggle>


    -
    Puppy Videos!!
    https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud


    The image of another one of Zeus's forged accounts, no doubt. At some point Snit Glasser will realize his 'buddy' is yanking him around. I think the
    point is far from just to get them to listen to him. The point is likely
    to piss me off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent. Other than Zeus, who *doesn't* know what Snit Glasser is doing? I see you're electing
    to wallow in Zeus's domain of puppets and game playing over a debate that would have been a shard more 'useful'. There are not so many reasons to
    come to Usenet and absurd attacks like this highlights why that's true.

    No one who isn't just using you for wicked advantage sees you as anything remotely close to honest. You have no one but Zeus to point to for that.

    --
    Best CMS Solution of 2017! https://www.google.com/maps/place/108+Warrior+Dr,+Kingsport,+TN+37663/
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen@21:1/5 to Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen on Fri May 20 13:21:00 2022
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 11:46:07 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll - fretwizzen wrote:
    On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 10:42:09 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:49:35 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    Snit's computer has more hard drives than Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey's.
    Snit wins. Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey loses. Nothing LCD about it. Nobody
    gets it, I don't get it. He would have to be afflicted with dementia to be unsure of if he "once had" built a website. Ring any bells? When someone
    can't keep his lies straight and makes use of bogus, self-esteem protecting
    hot air later, it's acutely obvious what his ploy is. Several people keep
    replying to Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey. To be honest, I don't criticize
    Snit for his animosity but I can not understand why he writes here with Commander 'The Shill' Kinsey here. Snit is more interested in discussions
    as found in a BBS group and trolling environments bother him too much.



    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
    https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names-Winthrops-
    VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
    Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
    No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----
    No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
    By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
    is.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
    Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.

    Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
    in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

    Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days.

    So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

    But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
    he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in.

    But Carroll could not leave his story there.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
    Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
    to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.

    This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

    Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
    the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

    He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
    one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
    He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
    he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
    a lie. Proved.

    Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
    What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
    someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

    Just nonsense.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
    8ZYUnwJ
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
    But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
    is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
    So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
    - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
    information so the hacker would not know.

    Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
    it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
    Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
    and "forgers" which do not even exist.

    The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
    café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

    My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
    about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
    his lies are. :)

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason.
    -----
    Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

    I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

    Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
    Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
    to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

    Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
    Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

    Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
    he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
    Why has he not said anything about this?

    My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
    and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

    This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
    Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

    His story changes with the telling.

    But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
    to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
    tried it with me.

    Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account.
    -----
    Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
    the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
    interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
    in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

    He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
    I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
    for certain?

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----

    No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----

    Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----

    A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
    A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

    Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
    More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

    Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----

    No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-show- https-and-not-http https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll
    It was Theo who flooded Shadow's site thousands of times and pretended
    he did not do it.

    Translation: "Theo" is now *altogether* unable to camouflage his trolling. Theo is trying to project their modus operandi onto Shadow. For as long
    as I can remember Theo has spurred the belief that Shadow needs 'documentation'
    to point out all his forgeries. The fact is that no one needs any reason
    to do that. So Theo pulls this insane blaming crap in a sickly effort
    to 'peddle' the idea that Shadow is like he is. Those who know this thread knows the flood bot is not created in the way Shadow is thinking, and
    most of them are flat out manually written.

    <giggle>


    -
    Puppy Videos!!
    https://v5.yc.edu/webtools/search/srchproc.asp <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
    Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud


    Ryan Sullivan has gone the extra mile, essentially hand holding Snit sock
    The Thing on coding practices only for Snit sock The Thing to blindly attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject. In
    all reality, it's too hard for snit. Just look at what Snit sock The Thing
    has posted and look at mine, there is nothing for Ryan Sullivan to learn
    from a mindless moron like Snit sock The Thing. But whatever, let him keep making a dolt of himself. He can make another sock to pat himself on the
    back. When will Snit sock The Thing support the allegation they've made multiple times recently about me being a Ryan Sullivan sock?

    Outright gobbledygook by an ignorant, fibbing, manipulative, co-trolling
    clown who couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. Do not get
    too egotistical, Snit sock The Thing, sometimes "your unquotable lies" are just that.

    --
    My Snoring Solution! https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)