XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
On 15 Jan 2022 00:00:48 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
snips relevant content from his reply (restored above
for clarity), and then immediately does an ad hominem attack rather than addressing what is actually being discussed - a glaring sign of an ineffective troll who can't contribute to the discussion at hand.
Just pathetic.
Your worst enemy, the one you _hate_ the most, JR, is a fact about Apple.
What _adults_ (if any are on this newsgroup) should notice, Jolly Roger, is that you can be predicted years in advance as to how you respond to facts.
It's a given _all_ your responses are of a low-IQ fifth-grade hate-filled vitriolic bully - but let's look at how you _respond_ to facts, shall we?
1. Any fact you don't like about Apple you will brazenly deny _is_ a fact.
2. Any fact you can't deny - you will _still_ brazenly deny that fact, JR.
3. Finally, you will fabricate unending _excuses_ when you can't deny it.
*But why are you, Lewis & nospam so filled with hatred for mere facts?*
The real problem, JR, is you three apologists violently _hate_ any and all facts about Apple products - which is why you claim all facts are BAD.
It's really that simple.
When you can't claim all facts are BAD, you attack people with facts as BAD.
Your worst enemy, the one you _hate_ the most, JR, is a fact about Apple. Especially when, as in this case, the _entire world_ is claiming that fact.
Even when the entire world is telling you a fact you don't want to hear, you "protect" yourself from that fact by exclaiming that the entire world is out
to get Apple - as you just did there.
Without you, nospam & Lewis to protect Apple at all costs... who else would?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)