On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 6:19:26 PM UTC-7, Steven Petruzzellis wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:02:40 AM UTC-7, Andy Burnelli wrote:
nospam wrote:
and what do you expect to do with system files?
You can tell iKooks _hate_ how crippled iOS always ends up proving to be.
Your standard MO for when iOS is crippled is to claim that nobody wants to do what _every_ other consumer operating system easily does - except iOS.
For example, I easily see iOS system files when I plug an iPad into Linux. And I easily see system files when I connect Android over WiFi to Windows.
The fact is with _all_ common operating systems _except_ iOS, the system files are readable for a reason, even if iKooks like you don't know that.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
The good news with reproducing what we can easily do with Android
what you describe is not what anyone would call easy.
I _knew_ you iKooks couldn't handle any basic amount of technical detail.
You're actually _afraid_ of something as simple as an IP address & port!
adb pair <ipaddress>:<port> <pin>
It's interesting that _every_ post you write proves iKooks own a low IQ.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
it's about the most convoluted, most fucked up and least productive method possible, which explains why you want to use it.
And yet, it's simply pairing an IP address with a port.
To you iKooks, that's too much detail for your low IQ brains to fathom.
adb pair <ipaddress>:<port> <pin>
You don't realize nospam, how incredibly _stupid_ you iKooks really are. You ikooks are, literally, deathly afraid of a simple port for God's sake!
It's likely you iKooks don't even know what a port is, nospam.
Nobody but an iKook would say that defining a port is so scary to them.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
meanwhile, the rest of the world can easily (go look up the meaning) copy files in both directions without needing to do much beyond a
couple of taps.
Here we go again, nospam, with you bullshitting because you _hate_ that iOS
is the only common consumer operating system literally crippled by Apple.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
this has been explained to you zillions of times.
More evidence that you own a rather dismal IQ nospam is you can't change your excuses for the lack of iOS functionality from what a child would say.
You actually think people believe you when you constantly claim that you, of all people, know iOS enough to do what _every_ other OS already does.
It's clear you don't know anything about iOS nospam.
But what's more clear is you lie because you _hate_ how crippled iOS is.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
is that
iOS used to come with a native WebDAV server implementation in a few apps.
no it didn't, nor does it on android.
Actually, for once you are correct as those were WebDAV clients.
Which is why I don't plonk you like I do Alan Baker and Snit, nospam.
I don't plonk Jolly Roger or Lewis either, but that's only because they're _perfect_ examples of how incredibly hateful you iKooks are of iOS.
any features that third party apps implement are entirely up to the developers of said apps.
Tell us how, nospam, without _any_ logins and without the Internet, you will get read/write visibility to the entire iOS file system (including expansion memory), over Wi-Fi, using only freeware, on the iPad/iPhone.
That's what I'd like to do, & let's be clear, every other platform does it.
--
You can tell iKooks _hate_ how crippled iOS always ends up proving to be.
The guy is as popular as a tax collector -- and with good cause. Of course
I noted examples of Peter the Klöwn attacking Snit (a real advocate) -- twisting Snit (a real advocate)'s words, etc. His response: to troll Snit
(a real advocate). Steven Petruzzellis is a Narcissistic Bigot.
One day, if you bother to focus... you'd see that Peter the Klöwn's trick is to 'carelessly' incite people and then play 'victim'. Why does Peter
the Klöwn focus on Snit (a real advocate)'s ego so much?
You hacked it and read multiple reviews and your "amazing brain powers"
lead you to that opinion, did they?
-
E-commerce Simplified
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-b7075a23
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <
https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
is.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they
use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone
or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.
Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
hard to hack these days.
So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing
the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
The "hacker" got one post in.
But Carroll could not leave his story there.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <
https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too
stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll
*surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker"
might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.
This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts!
LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and
felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next
quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <
https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account
is a lie. Proved.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <
https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions
other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And
how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems
you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too
much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
Just nonsense.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
8ZYUnwJ
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
- and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in
any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation,
which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make
it public information so the hacker would not know.
Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account -
the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to
have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working
to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report
like this: <
http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the
part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with
"hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.
The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver
area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from
an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even
more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I
had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just
copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am
to see how absurd his lies are. :)
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
*post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes
it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories
that make *no* sense at all.
Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
says they did.
Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this?
My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and
it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <
https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
His story changes with the telling.
But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods
recently tried it with me.
Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the
gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think
you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English.
But the basic look stays the same.
He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not
use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
for certain?
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.
Do not think this is over.
-----
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.
Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.
See if those can not be quoted.
-----
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----
A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified
to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older
posts being edited.
--
Eight things to never feed your cat
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)