• From Steve Carrolll@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 23 13:17:32 2022
    My view is correct. Always correct. F. Russell wants to punish us: If F. Russell can't have dominate conversations here then nobody will.

    These posts are clearly NOT automated, they are made by F. Russell who
    is a glue sniffing stalker with a sick agenda who has way too much time
    on his hands (and possibly has other scum helping him).

    --
    Live on Kickstarter! <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.digital/c/e7iwP04xhNU> https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ann Glaser@21:1/5 to Ann Glaser on Mon May 23 15:56:55 2022
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:17:34 PM UTC-7, Ann Glaser wrote:
    My view is correct. Always correct. F. Russell wants to punish us: If F. Russell can't have dominate conversations here then nobody will.

    These posts are clearly NOT automated, they are made by F. Russell who
    is a glue sniffing stalker with a sick agenda who has way too much time
    on his hands (and possibly has other scum helping him).

    --
    Live on Kickstarter! <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.digital/c/e7iwP04xhNU> https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot


    This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
    real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
    even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.

    Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:

    <rrdeqo$kog$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>

    And the reply:

    <zctCH.2588$rY1.190@fx40.iad>

    Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
    then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
    "one incident" of his outrageous behavior.

    Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
    because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!

    He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow through, but he gives away his game with this comment:

    -----
    ...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
    feel guilty for blowing the whistle
    -----
    He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
    of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
    tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.

    To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
    how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
    but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
    him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
    much?

    In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
    His words. No need to dig back.

    After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
    it:

    <d278fe60-ce88-403d-95a2-6f108edeb1de@googlegroups.com>
    -----
    I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
    deserved it
    -----

    Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
    he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.

    -
    What Every Entrepreneur Must Know https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22 https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)