• Re: Apple Already Testing USB-C for iPhone

    From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 14 21:44:42 2022
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 9:00:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-14 8:14 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    You might soon be able to stop lugging a Lightning cable around with >>>> your
    phone.


    Thank gawd!!

    I have a double hernia from lugging that damn lightning cable around.

    you too? i thought it was just me.

    This is yet another clear indication of the rather low IQ of the iKooks.

    I used to wonder why the iKooks can't grasp even this, one of the most basic of concepts of standardization on cabling standards moving forward.
    Do you know what "tautology" means...

    ...or did your education not cover that?

    I thought it was just that they drank the koolaid, but why there have been these flame wars over the decades with Apple aficionados is simply that the Apple iKooks own a superlatively low IQ. Nothing more complex than that.

    These low-IQ iKooks can't possibly comprehend what it means in convenience when the goal is to standardize on a single industry standard for cabling.
    To "standardize on a [] standard".

    Even something as _simple_ as that concept, is beyond iKooks' mental grasp.


    Anyone who groks Chris's posts knows the AIM bot is not spawned in the
    manner RonB is suggesting, and many of them are clearly manually written.
    RonB shared a specific series of pages several times now, and invited Chris
    to show which ones aren't accurate and provide the testimony to back his
    claim. No way has Chris done so.
    What an amazing search- <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    No need even for the name Duston Cook: <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22>
    No more!


    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! https://www.google.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stefen Carrolll - frelwizzer@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Sat May 14 23:35:21 2022
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 8:14:13 PM UTC-7, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    You might soon be able to stop lugging a Lightning cable around with your >>> phone.


    Thank gawd!!

    I have a double hernia from lugging that damn lightning cable around.

    you too? i thought it was just me.

    This is yet another clear indication of the rather low IQ of the iKooks.

    I used to wonder why the iKooks can't grasp even this, one of the most
    basic of concepts of standardization on cabling standards moving forward.

    I thought it was just that they drank the koolaid, but why there have been these flame wars over the decades with Apple aficionados is simply that the Apple iKooks own a superlatively low IQ. Nothing more complex than that.

    These low-IQ iKooks can't possibly comprehend what it means in convenience when the goal is to standardize on a single industry standard for cabling.

    Even something as _simple_ as that concept, is beyond iKooks' mental grasp.


    Helping Kelly Phillips and helping Doomsdrzej is not the same thing. Nobody should knowingly help Kelly Phillips do anything - except for driving into
    a brick wall, shooting yourself, or successfully decapitating himself.

    Kelly Phillips suffers from neurotic drug trips so, to him, everything,
    even people ignoring him, are "abuses". Who doesn't know this? He'd have
    to have intense madness to be unsure of if he "never had" worked with a program.
    Ring any bells? When a guy can not be consistent with his story and employs dishonest, ego protecting codswallop later, it's damn undeniable what his trolling is. Doomsdrzej has been around to comprehend the depths of Kelly Phillips's descent.


    --
    Get Rich Slow!!
    https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 15 12:05:59 2022
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 9:00:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-14 8:14 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    You might soon be able to stop lugging a Lightning cable around with >>>> your
    phone.


    Thank gawd!!

    I have a double hernia from lugging that damn lightning cable around.

    you too? i thought it was just me.

    This is yet another clear indication of the rather low IQ of the iKooks.

    I used to wonder why the iKooks can't grasp even this, one of the most basic of concepts of standardization on cabling standards moving forward.
    Do you know what "tautology" means...

    ...or did your education not cover that?

    I thought it was just that they drank the koolaid, but why there have been these flame wars over the decades with Apple aficionados is simply that the Apple iKooks own a superlatively low IQ. Nothing more complex than that.

    These low-IQ iKooks can't possibly comprehend what it means in convenience when the goal is to standardize on a single industry standard for cabling.
    To "standardize on a [] standard".

    Even something as _simple_ as that concept, is beyond iKooks' mental grasp.


    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
    number:

    <XnsAC34A629C8F3DHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32ADC5A8EECHT1@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62CD62DDHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62EE3F39HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62ACDF8HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62A42D90HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D794DE5AD5HT1@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C66D49387HT1@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212DEE4D1DCHT1@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC21106DF6C20HT1@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    Get Rich Slow
    https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Snit Michael Glasser on Sun May 15 19:06:13 2022
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 12:06:02 PM UTC-7, Snit Michael Glasser wrote:
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 9:00:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-14 8:14 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    You might soon be able to stop lugging a Lightning cable around with >>>> your
    phone.


    Thank gawd!!

    I have a double hernia from lugging that damn lightning cable around. >>
    you too? i thought it was just me.

    This is yet another clear indication of the rather low IQ of the iKooks.

    I used to wonder why the iKooks can't grasp even this, one of the most basic of concepts of standardization on cabling standards moving forward.
    Do you know what "tautology" means...

    ...or did your education not cover that?

    I thought it was just that they drank the koolaid, but why there have been
    these flame wars over the decades with Apple aficionados is simply that the
    Apple iKooks own a superlatively low IQ. Nothing more complex than that.

    These low-IQ iKooks can't possibly comprehend what it means in convenience
    when the goal is to standardize on a single industry standard for cabling.
    To "standardize on a [] standard".

    Even something as _simple_ as that concept, is beyond iKooks' mental grasp.
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    --
    Get Rich Slow
    https://www.udemy.com/user/michael-glasser/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud


    Michael Snit Glasser's computer has more scripts than Carroll's. Michael
    Snit Glasser wins. Carroll loses. So take that, Carroll.

    What were you thinking?

    Please give a single time of a large company that has gained its wealth
    by not giving a damn about its customers or services. Nearly all advocates
    in this forum do scripting either as recreation or as a trade, so I am skeptical
    anybody here thinks of automation to be "witch craft". My view is that we should ALL report the flooding and then it will stop. A gross fabrication
    by Carroll. Michael Snit Glasser did not deny uploading it, but he did not publish it to Veoh. Carroll did that, in an account that uses his information....
    and he did it because he's obsessed with Carroll kicking his ass 7 ways to Sunday.

    --
    My Snoring Solution https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22 <https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/details?phoneno=4234911448&rid=0x0&Diesel&Gremlin&Dustin_Cook>
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HHI the imaginary friend@21:1/5 to HHI the imaginary friend on Tue May 17 00:15:32 2022
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:35:24 PM UTC-7, HHI the imaginary friend wrote:
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 8:14:13 PM UTC-7, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    You might soon be able to stop lugging a Lightning cable around with your
    phone.


    Thank gawd!!

    I have a double hernia from lugging that damn lightning cable around.

    you too? i thought it was just me.

    This is yet another clear indication of the rather low IQ of the iKooks.

    I used to wonder why the iKooks can't grasp even this, one of the most basic of concepts of standardization on cabling standards moving forward.

    I thought it was just that they drank the koolaid, but why there have been these flame wars over the decades with Apple aficionados is simply that the Apple iKooks own a superlatively low IQ. Nothing more complex than that.

    These low-IQ iKooks can't possibly comprehend what it means in convenience when the goal is to standardize on a single industry standard for cabling.

    Even something as _simple_ as that concept, is beyond iKooks' mental grasp.
    Helping Kelly Phillips and helping Doomsdrzej is not the same thing. Nobody should knowingly help Kelly Phillips do anything - except for driving into
    a brick wall, shooting yourself, or successfully decapitating himself.

    Kelly Phillips suffers from neurotic drug trips so, to him, everything,
    even people ignoring him, are "abuses". Who doesn't know this? He'd have
    to have intense madness to be unsure of if he "never had" worked with a program.
    Ring any bells? When a guy can not be consistent with his story and employs dishonest, ego protecting codswallop later, it's damn undeniable what his trolling is. Doomsdrzej has been around to comprehend the depths of Kelly Phillips's descent.


    --
    Get Rich Slow!!
    https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll


    Translation: "Carroll" is now COMPLETELY unable to camouflage his lying.

    Given how repeatedly it seems that Carroll's post is some twist of a comment Troll Killer Snit shared which had been a beating on Carroll for something
    he did which was ill-considered/wrong/etc... its truly a common sign of Carroll's
    unending unease for having been so frequently humiliated.

    Despite Carroll's claim that he has "no enthusiasm in making a flood bot"
    (a lie as shown by the fact that he slammed Troll Killer Snit's site) he
    was seen asking support staff how they would do a DDOS attack.


    --
    One Smart Penny!
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)