1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.SYSTEM

  • Mac Studio performance

    From Lewis@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 30 10:22:29 2022
    The second chart here is hilarious.

    <http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
    "Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it
    went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the
    full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."

    Then there's the THIRD chart.

    Suck it, Intel.

    --
    "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
    "I think so, Brain, but Tuesday Weld isn't a complete sentence."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Lewis on Sat Apr 30 10:53:30 2022
    On 2022-04-30 3:22 a.m., Lewis wrote:
    The second chart here is hilarious.

    <http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
    "Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it
    went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."

    Then there's the THIRD chart.

    Suck it, Intel.


    Saw this already...

    ...but what I really want to know is how they fooled this former winner
    of NASA's Software of the Year Award into believing that these are
    really Apple processors.

    ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Glasser@21:1/5 to Lewis on Sat Apr 30 22:51:42 2022
    On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 3:22:33 AM UTC-7, Lewis wrote:
    The second chart here is hilarious.

    <http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
    "Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."

    Then there's the THIRD chart.

    Suck it, Intel.

    --
    "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
    "I think so, Brain, but Tuesday Weld isn't a complete sentence."


    My uptime is almost fifty-five days and OS X is still going strong!

    What did Wolffan have to say about this miraculous, years long string
    of oddities? Most of the time he would try to push the advocates to trust they're long time lurkers who just happened to have not enough brains
    to see through his lies. And he expected people to believe this! AVG
    was initially coded and compiled using a bootleg copy of JetBrains Rider,
    in Visual Basic 6. Wolffan is trying (with "all they have") to project
    their crap onto Snit. For some time Wolffan has spurred the idea that
    Snit needs 'support' to point out all his trolling. The fact is that
    nobody needs any help to do that. So Wolffan pulls this insane trolling foolishness in a sickly effort to 'hawk' the idea that Snit is like him.
    I have not substantiated that the number: 423.491.1448 belongs to Wolffan.

    --
    Eight things to never feed your dog! https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Lewis on Sun May 1 11:32:42 2022
    On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 3:22:33 AM UTC-7, Lewis wrote:
    The second chart here is hilarious.

    <http://hrtapps.com/blogs/20220427/>
    "Performance of the Mac Studio is actually off the chart here. Before it went off the chart, the Mac Studio’s 6-core performance caught up to the full 28-core performance of the Mac Pro and then surpassed it."

    Then there's the THIRD chart.

    Suck it, Intel.

    --
    "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
    "I think so, Brain, but Tuesday Weld isn't a complete sentence."


    Keep in mind your accusation is based on you not understanding context.
    Your game:

    * Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code .
    * Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

    Then you insist I lied. But you leave out the context.

    1) Snit spoke of Carroll's flood bot code, and what can be known without
    the code
    2) Dustin Cook responded by speaking of what he can know HAVING THE CODE.
    3) Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code.
    4) Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

    You start at step three and then insist that if one starts there it LOOKS
    like you were unfairly accused.

    In short: you prove yourself a functionally illiterate fraud again.

    --
    This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
    Automate Google Groups https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Petruzzellis$20or$20Carroll
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)