On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 7:09:14 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll - fretwizen wrote:
I am happy the person you are responding to is in my kill filter. All
that he cares about is that Peeler gets to dish out his poorly written
flyer and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Snit is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is the game.
This forum is a leaking porta potty. Snit teased Peeler a bit, big f*cking deal. No need to be a howling ass about it? I mostly go post by post unless someone has a history of particularly drastic shilling. With Peeler, I already intuit what his MO is, all he seeks is abuse and, as you have
seen, he will do ANYTHING to get it. His most favorite routine is to play 'shill' but reality shows it's all of his targets who are his suckers.
Don't look now, but I think Peeler has a serious woody for Snit.
--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You
Automate Google Groups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYQ4Tg0r0g0&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis
William Poaster expects people to believe that a poster such as Nospam who
he has repeatedly alleged to be a troll is someone to 'respect'? Why can
he think people are *that* stupid?
William Poaster: <rqebpk$f4d$
1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
> An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?
That's all any of the code demos I've shown Nospam
are, for years now.
-----
But then William Poaster flip flops:
William Poaster: <rqk10g$j1c$
1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
AS, in this thread, not "the past"
(gain some self control and dry out)."
-----
William Poaster starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in
the past. And William Poaster insists the code from the past was not tied
to bots... directly contradicting themselves. Wow! How did William Poaster
get SO narcissistic he thinks everything is about his comments??
Both Nospam and William Poaster had their malfunctions and their predicaments. One played it as supernatural and didn't do anything too shocking that could not be proved mathematically.
William Poaster doesn't know if there is a free open source solution.
William Poaster is repeatedly seen insisting "CANNOT BE FOUND" when it comes
to text on the web where it does exist... but William Poaster is just too
soft in the head and/or lazy to discern any advice he finds.
--
Get Rich Slow!
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22 https://prescott-arizona.janbarham.org.au/yavapai-college-library-202.html/ https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Steve%20Petruzzellis%20narcissistic%20bigot
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)