On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 5:22:03 AM UTC-7, Stephen Petruzzellis wrote:
When will Snit sock Glasser Michael Snit support the allegation she's
made copius times now about me being a Gregory Hall sock?
I don't explain that. Crudeness is crudeness and there are many who
are in agreement with it. Several are even teachers. Some time ago I
did work on and showed some C++ for the front end (only works on Linux)
which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Snit sock Glasser Michael Snit's narcissistic crap while reading with Google Groups.
I bet he thinks his wife's life was hard.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.
Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:
<rrdeqo$kog$
1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
And the reply:
<zctCH.2588$
rY1.190@fx40.iad>
Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
"one incident" of his outrageous behavior.
Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!
He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow through, but he gives away his game with this comment:
-----
...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
feel guilty for blowing the whistle
-----
He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not
speak of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done
so. He tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.
To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who
made him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself
so much?
In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
His words. No need to dig back.
After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While
he currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted
to it:
<
d278fe60-ce88-403d-95a2-6f108edeb1de@googlegroups.com>
-----
I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
deserved it
-----
Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview... he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot
stop himself.
--
My Snoring Solution!
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)