• For a good time call 1-928-776-9519

    From HHI the imaginary friend@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 7 19:07:07 2022
    Given how frequently it seems that Alan B's post is some misquote of a narrative Owl wrote which had been a blow on Alan B for something he did
    which was absurd/fallacious/etc... its undoubtedly a common demonstration
    of Alan B's ever-present unease for having been so repeatedly pwned: Alan
    B is demonstrably incapable of being shown a mirror. In fact Alan B's lies
    only grew. So of course I regret not attacking Alan B. While I am sure
    his wife appreciated it, I've not helped the situation at all. Alan B is
    STILL focusing on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the issue
    of puppet usage. And he completely evades the proof that his "friend" has
    not only confessed to engaging in this against Owl but he has said he thinks
    it to be no real deal... a joke.

    I'm well aware the stuff I link to from Reddit is merely dabbler level.
    That said, it meets the requirements.

    Does Owl even believe the idiocy Alan B is pushing?

    How long has this debate been going on?


    -
    My Snoring Solution! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22FUNCTIONAL+ILLITERATE+FRAUD%22 https://swisscows.com/web?query=Dustin%20Cook%20%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
    https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Thu Apr 7 22:18:13 2022
    On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 7:07:09 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    Given how frequently it seems that Alan B's post is some misquote of a narrative Owl wrote which had been a blow on Alan B for something he did which was absurd/fallacious/etc... its undoubtedly a common demonstration
    of Alan B's ever-present unease for having been so repeatedly pwned: Alan
    B is demonstrably incapable of being shown a mirror. In fact Alan B's lies only grew. So of course I regret not attacking Alan B. While I am sure
    his wife appreciated it, I've not helped the situation at all. Alan B is STILL focusing on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the issue
    of puppet usage. And he completely evades the proof that his "friend" has
    not only confessed to engaging in this against Owl but he has said he thinks it to be no real deal... a joke.

    I'm well aware the stuff I link to from Reddit is merely dabbler level.
    That said, it meets the requirements.

    Does Owl even believe the idiocy Alan B is pushing?

    How long has this debate been going on?


    -
    My Snoring Solution! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22FUNCTIONAL+ILLITERATE+FRAUD%22 https://swisscows.com/web?query=Dustin%20Cook%20%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
    https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
    Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll


    This is what Carroll does: he points to comment ABOUT people (made from
    real people or socks), no matter how unsupported, and calls that evedence
    even as he ignores what the target of his accusations actually has said.

    Meanwhile I just point to what Carroll says:

    <rrdeqo$kog$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>

    And the reply:

    <zctCH.2588$rY1.190@fx40.iad>

    Carroll admits to, at the very least, threats of harassing my employer,
    then tries to minimize it by saying multiple posts somehow count as just
    "one incident" of his outrageous behavior.

    Then Carroll bizarrely insists people should WANT to be harassed by him
    because that gives them a chance to prove they are innocent. Utter insanity!

    He directly admits to the threats but tries to pretend he did not follow through, but he gives away his game with this comment:

    -----
    ...here you *still* are, trying to make it appear that *I* should
    feel guilty for blowing the whistle
    -----
    He refers to his harassment as "blowing the whistle" -- but does not speak
    of feeling guilty IF he had done so, but speaks about HAVING done so. He
    tried to deny it, but then made it clear he harassed my employer.

    To add more support to his admission there, he claims to not understand
    how harassing people is bad, or how innocent people can be harmed by his harassment. He admits he cannot see what is wrong with such harassment,
    but then pretends he was stopped by some anonymous Jiminy Cricket who made
    him rethink how wrong his actions are. Why does he contradict himself so
    much?

    In short: He proves much of what I have been saying about him right there.
    His words. No need to dig back.

    After he screwed up, and as predicted, "new" people showed up. While he currently is denying he uses such socks, in the past he has admitted to
    it:

    <d278fe60-ce88-403d-95a2-6f108edeb1de@googlegroups.com>
    -----
    I faked those Mac accounts, (i.e Toasty) because you
    deserved it
    -----

    Yeah, he does bad things because his victims deserve it. That is his worldview...
    he needs his anonymous Jiminy Cricket to stop him. He cannot stop himself.

    --
    Eight things to never feed your cat! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22
    Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)