In message <t1t1de$umo$1...@dont-email.me> sms <scharf...@geemail.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2022 10:13 AM, Alan wrote:
How in the world did Apple dupe ZDNet?
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-mac-studio-review/?ftag=CAD-03-10abf6j>
'But, of course, it's the M1 processors inside the Mac Studio that
really set it apart from the more compact Mac Mini. As mentioned, the
Mac Studio is available with either an M1 Max or M1 Ultra, the latter
providing a 20-core CPU, 48 or 64 GPU cores, and a 32-core Neural Engine. >>
The top-end M1 Ultra is essentially two M1 Max chips bolted together
using Apple's on-die UltraFusion architecture.'
Or did Apple bribe them to stay quiet?
Because nowhere does the article mention TSMC.
No bribes, ZDNet's authors just aren't technology experts orThey certainly know the details better than you do.
semiconductor geeks that understand about chip technology. You can't
expect many journalists to know the details about this kind of stuff.
Only a completely brain-dead troll would try to claim that Apple's chips
are not Apple.
--
Vitamins are a waste of money, you can eat like $200 worth and still feel hungry.
In article <t20cet$6dn$1...@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh...@nope.com> wrote:
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
including intel, who plans to use tsmc to fab some of intel's own chips.
And then there are Qualcomm, Nvidia...yep, but intel is surprising given that they have their own fabs.
unfortunately, intel is well behind the curve, thus the need to sub it
out to tsmc.
...and lots of other who have no fabs either.
According to our Arlen, every Qualcomm chip--every Nvidia chip...
...is actually "TSMC Silicon"?he has absolutely no idea about pretty much everything.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:42:35 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,962 |