This is something you merely pretend to understand.
Snit sock Sigmond never takes blame for his own comments. Posts that
are easily seen to be trolling.
Hint: You can not go into a social event, knock back all the sauce, pound
all the chicks, take the hors d'oeuvres and barf in the john without being disinvited. Proof Snit sock Sigmond accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png.
It was Snit sock Sigmond who was openly asking how better to obscure
his flooding.
--
Puppy Videos https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
<http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin-
cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
https://redd.it/6sfkup
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 7:40:07 AM UTC-7, Stefen Carrolll - fretwizzer wrote:
This is something you merely pretend to understand.
Snit sock Sigmond never takes blame for his own comments. Posts that
are easily seen to be trolling.
Hint: You can not go into a social event, knock back all the sauce, pound all the chicks, take the hors d'oeuvres and barf in the john without being disinvited. Proof Snit sock Sigmond accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png.
It was Snit sock Sigmond who was openly asking how better to obscure
his flooding.
--Snit Michael Glasser doesn't have any concept of what he is babbling about.
Puppy Videos https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
<http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin-
cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
https://redd.it/6sfkup
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
You haven't been around to even partially understand the depths of the
guy's perversion.
In Snit Michael Glasser's case, I, and many, many "forgers", had pointed
to things Snit Michael Glasser said and did, he laughed it off. What Snit Michael Glasser could not deny was people actually posting what I noted, which is how he ended up with his list, of course. I am about to give up
on him, myself. Like all idiots, he's continually looking for some way
to blame, no matter how laughable the charge. I will not see his response
to this post. He is hurting, wants to blame others, and will attack. Most likely starting with a cocky "*plonk*", as if what I've written is SO hard
to understand. That BADish "approach" was the final stroke, for me.
Too much glue for you, gluey.
-
Do not click this link! <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.digital/c/e7iwP04xhNU>
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 7:40:07 AM UTC-7, Stefen Carrolll - fretwizzer wrote:
This is something you merely pretend to understand.
Snit sock Sigmond never takes blame for his own comments. Posts that
are easily seen to be trolling.
Hint: You can not go into a social event, knock back all the sauce, pound all the chicks, take the hors d'oeuvres and barf in the john without being disinvited. Proof Snit sock Sigmond accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png.
It was Snit sock Sigmond who was openly asking how better to obscure
his flooding.
--Snit Michael Glasser doesn't have any concept of what he is babbling about.
Puppy Videos https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
<http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin-
cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
https://redd.it/6sfkup
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
You haven't been around to even partially understand the depths of the
guy's perversion.
In Snit Michael Glasser's case, I, and many, many "forgers", had pointed
to things Snit Michael Glasser said and did, he laughed it off. What Snit Michael Glasser could not deny was people actually posting what I noted, which is how he ended up with his list, of course. I am about to give up
on him, myself. Like all idiots, he's continually looking for some way
to blame, no matter how laughable the charge. I will not see his response
to this post. He is hurting, wants to blame others, and will attack. Most likely starting with a cocky "*plonk*", as if what I've written is SO hard
to understand. That BADish "approach" was the final stroke, for me.
Too much glue for you, gluey.
-
Do not click this link! <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.digital/c/e7iwP04xhNU>
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
Despite Wolffan's claim that he has "no enthusiasm in making enemies" (a
lie as demonstrated by the fact that he slammed Troll Killer Snit's site)
he was quoted asking support staff how they would trick someone to give
up their password.
Translation: "Wolffan" is now *altogether* powerless to shield his trolling.
Given how often it seems that Wolffan's .sig file is some twist of a statement
Troll Killer Snit shared which had been a beating on Wolffan for something
he did which was senseless/dishonest/etc... its really a common demonstration of Wolffan's continuing embarrassment for having been so repeatedly pwned: Wolffan is undeniably incapable of being slapped down.
Well... like I said, I know the flooder is Wolffan, who is a self professed bash scripter but I don't know if it could be used to get by Google's spam filters.
Why do you keep quoting Troll Killer Snit? You've proven nothing.
Several of us reported Wolffan years ago. As expected, it did not a thing
to slow the bozo.
--
Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com
Like most in the world, RonB (aka ronb) relies on false news to contrive
his opinions on the news. As such, he only believes and consents to the accepted news which also are the ones which represent humanism in favorable and educated slant. What is your evidence? I just don't understand the
point in RonB (aka ronb) continuing to make that claim, when they know
it's not accurate. I will no longer bring up the weirdest, so far, series
of tales they've written about me in the past; because many truthful experts did as I asked and told RonB (aka ronb) directly that they did, knowingly, misrepresent me when they talked about that subject. Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "Mac".
Steven "Narcissistic Bigot" Petruzzellis.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
Like most in the world, RonB (aka ronb) relies on false news to contrive
his opinions on the news. As such, he only believes and consents to the accepted news which also are the ones which represent humanism in favorable and educated slant. What is your evidence? I just don't understand the
point in RonB (aka ronb) continuing to make that claim, when they know
it's not accurate. I will no longer bring up the weirdest, so far, series
of tales they've written about me in the past; because many truthful experts did as I asked and told RonB (aka ronb) directly that they did, knowingly, misrepresent me when they talked about that subject. Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "Mac".
Steven "Narcissistic Bigot" Petruzzellis.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
Like most in the world, RonB (aka ronb) relies on false news to contrive
his opinions on the news. As such, he only believes and consents to the accepted news which also are the ones which represent humanism in favorable and educated slant. What is your evidence? I just don't understand the
point in RonB (aka ronb) continuing to make that claim, when they know
it's not accurate. I will no longer bring up the weirdest, so far, series
of tales they've written about me in the past; because many truthful experts did as I asked and told RonB (aka ronb) directly that they did, knowingly, misrepresent me when they talked about that subject. Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "Mac".
Steven "Narcissistic Bigot" Petruzzellis.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 3:19:54 AM UTC-7, HHI the imaginary friend wrote:
Like most in the world, RonB (aka ronb) relies on false news to contrive his opinions on the news. As such, he only believes and consents to the accepted news which also are the ones which represent humanism in favorable and educated slant. What is your evidence? I just don't understand the point in RonB (aka ronb) continuing to make that claim, when they know
it's not accurate. I will no longer bring up the weirdest, so far, series of tales they've written about me in the past; because many truthful experts
did as I asked and told RonB (aka ronb) directly that they did, knowingly, misrepresent me when they talked about that subject. Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "Mac".
Steven "Narcissistic Bigot" Petruzzellis.
--Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 3:19:54 AM UTC-7, HHI the imaginary friend wrote:
Like most in the world, RonB (aka ronb) relies on false news to contrive his opinions on the news. As such, he only believes and consents to the accepted news which also are the ones which represent humanism in favorable and educated slant. What is your evidence? I just don't understand the point in RonB (aka ronb) continuing to make that claim, when they know
it's not accurate. I will no longer bring up the weirdest, so far, series of tales they've written about me in the past; because many truthful experts
did as I asked and told RonB (aka ronb) directly that they did, knowingly, misrepresent me when they talked about that subject. Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "Mac".
Steven "Narcissistic Bigot" Petruzzellis.
--Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin> https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 56:21:53 |
Calls: | 6,652 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,330,867 |