I have a good memory, even after the recent spate of operations, where you >> ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunology - and yes - you RIDICULED it. >>
If you disagree, you'll simply force me to find the cites,
I disagree.
The pattern, which you can't see of course, is you using terms incorrectly and then get all arsey when those who actually know stuff try to correct
you.
First off, I was a lowly grad student, and secondly, all you have to do to >> be a "contributing author" to such peer-reviewed papers is do some of the
research
And what did you do that warrants you being able to still call yourself an immunologist decades later?
I did my bachelors and PhD in Chemistry I don't call myself a chemist these days. I lead research projects in other fields.
- so you again ridiculing it isn't warranted as my point was only
that I have degrees
That's what you claim yet won't directly evidence. The only thing others
can go on is what you say, which is worthless. Especially when you
constantly attack the messengers and name call.
in stuff that you iKooks don't and yet you iKooks
ridicule things such as a catenary & D-K quartiles & immunology terms.
Name calling isn't at all ridiculouS, of course.
My point is simply that you're all squarely to the west of Mount Stupid.
You're so stupid - you don't even realize how stupid you are.
That's the nicest way I can put it, at least the nicest way I can think of.
What's most funny regarding all this DK nonsense is you don't recognise how relevant it is to you. The more you claim you're an expert the more you
come across as a know-it-all who actually knows little.
I won't quote it as my name is on it - and you'll refute
it out of hand
So even you aren't confident on its significance.
One scientific paper? The significance? Not much. However it was seminal.
It can't be seminal if it wasn't very significant. Unless it's about
semen...
We studied the organisms and we studied their reactions and we surmised how >> what we observed could possibly have happened given the organisms were
never exposed to what they were found to be immune to and we looked at
patterns and we made assessments based on the facts as we knew them - which >> - turns out - a decade later - we were vindicated in all our premises.
You could easily tell us who the senior author was. They likely published dozens if not hundreds of papers which wouldn't divulge anything we don't already know.
If any of this true, I suspect you didn't travel far so would have likely been at UCSF or UCSD.
When you ridicule textbooks, it hints of you having never attended college.
I'm not ridiculing books. I'm ridiculing you for using photos of books as evidence of your college degrees. The fact you feel the need to even do
this speaks volumes about your fragile ego.
You're right, I never attended college. I went straight to university from school.
What's most funny regarding all this DK nonsense is you don't recognise how >> relevant it is to you. The more you claim you're an expert the more youI never once said I was an expert in anything (as far as I recall), Chris, where you just_think_ I'm an expert because I know so much more than you
come across as a know-it-all who actually knows little.
do.
Likewise, Alan Baker_claims_ to be an expert but he doesn't know the first thing about things he claims to be an expert in - where I only know them because I have a grasp of detail (e.g., what a BMW is called in racing circuits) that Alan Baker lacks. But let's be clear here, Chris - showing that I know more than Alan Baker does makes me no expert at all Chris.
You stated you'd find the cites.
Where are they?
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
I have a good memory, even after the recent spate of operations, where you >>>> ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunology - and yes - you RIDICULED it. >>>>
If you disagree, you'll simply force me to find the cites,
I disagree.
Hi Chris,
You stated you'd find the cites. Where are they?
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
You stated you'd find the cites.
You're so stupid, you don't even realize how stupid you are, Chris.
*You're classic Mount Stupid*, in fact, Chris.
That's a classic iKook tactic Chris - deny all facts - even words that YOU said yourself (you hate that your whole life people called you stupid).
Where are they?
The key way I'm different from you iKooks (other than my IQ isn't
substandard and I don't defend Apple to the death as a result), is that if
I say something happened - it happened.
I do not own an imaginary belief system like all you ignorant iKooks do.
Will you openly apologize when I post the URLs proving you said what you said, Chris - or will you play silly childish iKook games again Chris?
Remember, I'm an adult. You're not.
I readily and easily admit when I'm accidentally wrong. You can't.
Do you know why?
I do.
HINT: You're a child, Chris. You have been told your entire life that you
are stupid and you are - so you're _afraid_ of admitting when you're wrong.
You stated you'd find the cites.
You're so stupid,
Any chance of those promised cites?
Without the abuse and name calling.
That would be much appreciated.
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
You stated you'd find the cites.
You're so stupid,
Any chance of those promised cites?
For any _adult_ on these child-like Apple operating system newsgroups,
The reason Apple ngs are the cesspool they are, is because of iKooks.
That's not a fact - but it's an assessment of many (many) facts.
I don't say something is a fact unless it is a fact, unlike the child-like iKooks who repeatedly claim facts that they can never back up with cites.
a. nospam constantly fabricates imaginary iOS apps that don't exist
b. Jolly Roger constantly claims imaginary iOS support that doesn't exist
c. Alan Browne claims the walled garden he logs into doesn't exist
etc.
Who is that incredibly stupid?
Nobody right?
Except the iKooks.
Without the abuse and name calling.
I'm on plenty of adult operating system newsgroups, Chris.
And what happens there is NOT what happens on the child-like Apple ngs.
The Apple newsgroups are infested with people who own religious beliefs. That's why you iKooks are so deathly afraid of simple things, like facts.
The whole reason Apple newsgroups are what they are, Chris - is because you low-IQ ignorant uneducated religious zealots exist - such that you defend everything Apple ever did, said, or will do - to the death.
It's what makes you an iKook, Chris.
That would be much appreciated.
For years, Apple newsgroups have been different from adult OS newsgroups.
The reason is that you iKooks are what makes Apple ngs so childish, Chris.
I posted them already Chris. It was trivial to find since you said it.
What's interesting is you didn't bother looking up your own words.
*Like all iKooks* - your belief systems are always based on zero facts.
Every statement from you child-like iKooks proves what I say about you.
a. You did what I said you did.
b. You brazenly denied what you did do.
c. And then you haughtily ask me to prove you did what you said you did.
Without ever bothering to check the facts, Chris.
Never even once did you check what you had said, Chris.
Before outrighting denying that you said exactly what I said you said.
Who does that?
Nobody right?
Except the iKooks do it all the time, Chris.
The whole reason Apple groups are what they are, is because of you iKooks.
That is what I'm trying to show the world, Chris.
I don't say something is a fact unless it is a fact, unlike the child-like >> iKooks who repeatedly claim facts that they can never back up with cites.
The only one not backing up with cites in this thread is you.
That makes you the "iKook" here, doesn't it?
I posted them already Chris. It was trivial to find since you said it.
No you didn't.
Why are you lying?
That is what I'm trying to show the world, Chris.
That's quite an inflated ego you have there.
Not sure the world cares about your opinions.
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
I don't say something is a fact unless it is a fact, unlike the child-like >>> iKooks who repeatedly claim facts that they can never back up with cites. >>The only one not backing up with cites in this thread is you.
Jesus Christ, Chris.
I gave you the cites already Chris.
You're too stupid to CLICK on the link I gave you!
Classic Alan Baker behavior, Chris.
Facts can't exist (to you) if you refuse to acknowledge that they exist.
That makes you the "iKook" here, doesn't it?
Do you have to always PROVE MY POINT that you iKooks live on MT. Stupid?
a. You're too stupid to search for your own words, and,
b. When I do the work for you, you're too stupid to click the links.
Who is _that_ stupid, Chris?iKooks is not a thing in the real world.
Just you iKooks.
You are projecting from your hate addled mind.
You all live on Mount Stupid.
Mount Stupid is not a thing. You are delusional.
You spend way too much time attacking people on usenet.
This is not healthy.
Who is _that_ stupid, Chris?
Just you iKooks.
You all live on Mount Stupid.
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
[snip]
iKooks is not a thing in the real world. You are projecting from your hate addled mind.
Who is _that_ stupid, Chris?
Just you iKooks.
You all live on Mount Stupid.
Mount Stupid is not a thing. You are delusional. You spend way too much
time attacking people on usenet. This is not healthy.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Who is _that_ stupid, Chris?iKooks is not a thing in the real world.
Just you iKooks.
You are projecting from your hate addled mind.
Actually I don't hate the iKooks at all. In fact, I study you intently. That's why I know more about you, Hemidactylus, than you know yourself.
This is a stick diagram of the iKooks who post to Apple OS newsgroups.
<https://pcg.church/articles/7063/cut-off-mount-stupid>
You all live on Mount Stupid.
Mount Stupid is not a thing. You are delusional.
And yet, Mount Stupid _is_ a thing.
<https://dingdong887180022.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/dunning-kruger.jpg>
The adults will notice that the iKooks live on Mount Stupid in many ways,
as witnessed, moments ago, from their Mount Stupid posts to both the
Windows newsgroup (always via Alan Baker nyms) & to Android (Dave Royal).
To wit... (for the permanent Usenet record to find by future researchers).
Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> wrote
There were others but that one had a few to start with for now.
'Andy Burnelli' who started that thread has a familiar style! And it
doesn't mention DroidEdit or a couple of others I've tried over the years
and not preferred such as Simple Text Editor.
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (along with
his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out there).
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
I don't say something is a fact unless it is a fact, unlike the child-like >>>> iKooks who repeatedly claim facts that they can never back up with cites. >>>The only one not backing up with cites in this thread is you.
Jesus Christ, Chris.
I gave you the cites already Chris.
You're too stupid to CLICK on the link I gave you!
I had a thorough look through all your posts in this thread and I
eventually found an obfuscated link to an ng with no relevance to this
thread in your fucking signature. Why would any sane person do that? You
were intentionally trying to hide it.
Having found the hidden link and within it I needed to click through other links to find your cites. Eventually I found the thread.
And yes, I admit, I probably did mock you for your incorrect usage of technical/biological terminology. In my defence you had written an
extremely long and in many ways ill-informed post.
On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-12-31 20:37, Wally J wrote:
The adults will notice that the iKooks live on Mount Stupid in many ways, >>> as witnessed, moments ago, from their Mount Stupid posts to both the
Windows newsgroup (always via Alan Baker nyms) & to Android (Dave Royal). >>>
To wit... (for the permanent Usenet record to find by future researchers). >>>
Dave Royal <da...@dave123royal.com> wrote
There were others but that one had a few to start with for now.
'Andy Burnelli' who started that thread has a familiar style! And it
doesn't mention DroidEdit or a couple of others I've tried over the years >>>> and not preferred such as Simple Text Editor.
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (along with >>> his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out there). >> You just...
...make stuff up...
...don't you?
For the record, I have never posted as "Dave Royal" or any variation
thereof.
Alan does not make stuff up. He just does not answer questions, so no need to. Don't waste your time on Alan Baker.
On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-12-31 20:37, Wally J wrote:
The adults will notice that the iKooks live on Mount Stupid in many ways, >>> as witnessed, moments ago, from their Mount Stupid posts to both the
Windows newsgroup (always via Alan Baker nyms) & to Android (Dave Royal). >>>
To wit... (for the permanent Usenet record to find by future researchers). >>>
Dave Royal <da...@dave123royal.com> wrote
There were others but that one had a few to start with for now.
'Andy Burnelli' who started that thread has a familiar style! And it
doesn't mention DroidEdit or a couple of others I've tried over the years >>>> and not preferred such as Simple Text Editor.
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (along with >>> his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out there). >> You just...
...make stuff up...
...don't you?
For the record, I have never posted as "Dave Royal" or any variation
thereof.
Alan does not make stuff up. He just does not answer questions, so no need to. Don't waste your time on Alan Baker.
On 1/17/2024 8:06 AM, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (alongYou just...
with
his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out
there).
...make stuff up...
...don't you?
For the record, I have never posted as "Dave Royal" or any variation
thereof.
Alan does not make stuff up. He just does not answer questions, so no
need to. Don't waste your time on Alan Baker.
Alan is frequently confused about technical matters.
On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:47:40 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2024-01-17 08:06, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:Not answering your stalking it is not "just not answer[ing] questions"...
On 2023-12-31 20:37, Wally J wrote:
The adults will notice that the iKooks live on Mount Stupid in many ways, >>>>> as witnessed, moments ago, from their Mount Stupid posts to both the >>>>> Windows newsgroup (always via Alan Baker nyms) & to Android (Dave Royal). >>>>>
To wit... (for the permanent Usenet record to find by future researchers).
Dave Royal <da...@dave123royal.com> wrote
There were others but that one had a few to start with for now.
'Andy Burnelli' who started that thread has a familiar style! And it >>>>>> doesn't mention DroidEdit or a couple of others I've tried over the years
and not preferred such as Simple Text Editor.
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (along with >>>>> his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out there). >>>> You just...
...make stuff up...
...don't you?
For the record, I have never posted as "Dave Royal" or any variation
thereof.
Alan does not make stuff up. He just does not answer questions, so no need to. Don't waste your time on Alan Baker.
...dick.
LOL, just asking for confirmation of facts is not stalking.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 5:52:06 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2024-01-25 14:07, Thomas E. wrote:LOL, you have SO much to hide loser.
On Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 11:47:40 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:Going looking for the "facts" is the the stalking part...
On 2024-01-17 08:06, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 5:35:39 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:Not answering your stalking it is not "just not answer[ing] questions"... >>>>
On 2023-12-31 20:37, Wally J wrote:
The adults will notice that the iKooks live on Mount Stupid in many ways,You just...
as witnessed, moments ago, from their Mount Stupid posts to both the >>>>>>> Windows newsgroup (always via Alan Baker nyms) & to Android (Dave Royal).
To wit... (for the permanent Usenet record to find by future researchers).
Dave Royal <da...@dave123royal.com> wrote
There were others but that one had a few to start with for now. >>>>>>>>'Andy Burnelli' who started that thread has a familiar style! And it >>>>>>>> doesn't mention DroidEdit or a couple of others I've tried over the years
and not preferred such as Simple Text Editor.
This is my _last_ post to "Dave Royal" as he will be plonked (along with
his other nym of Alan Baker and all the other Alan Baker nyms out there).
...make stuff up...
...don't you?
For the record, I have never posted as "Dave Royal" or any variation >>>>>> thereof.
Alan does not make stuff up. He just does not answer questions, so no need to. Don't waste your time on Alan Baker.
...dick.
LOL, just asking for confirmation of facts is not stalking.
...Dick.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 77:17:03 |
Calls: | 6,716 |
Files: | 12,247 |
Messages: | 5,357,732 |