1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.ADVOCACY

  • Michael Glasser: 1 (423) 491-1448

    From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 10 02:55:44 2021
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested,
    when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact
    that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod
    Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation
    he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that
    he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Petruzzelis@21:1/5 to Steve Petruzzelis on Sun Oct 10 10:24:06 2021
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzelis wrote:
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod
    Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation
    he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that
    he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll



    Rbowman: <rqebpk$f4d$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    > An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?

    That's all any of the code demos I've shown Snit (a real advocate)
    are, for years now.
    -----

    But then Rbowman flip flops:

    Rbowman: <rqk10g$j1c$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
    AS, in this thread, not "the past"
    (drop your bizarre narratives and DRY out)."
    -----

    Rbowman starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in the past.
    And Rbowman insists the code from the past was not tied to bots... directly contradicting themselves.

    It was Rbowman who was openly asking how better to hide his scams. Lines
    of text containing this and that, but not what is needed.

    Of course, the lone thing that matters to Rbowman is arguing he is "accurate", and if he can not have that he will do more research to shout Snit (a real advocate) down... ignoring him is the only option. Rbowman doesn't have any clue what he is blubbering about.

    I want Rbowman to support her flooding accusation. Let's see the links Rbowman. When I accused Rbowman of socking as Snit (a real advocate) I actually supported
    it with proof.

    --
    Puppy Videos! https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Mon Oct 11 01:01:38 2021
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 10:24:07 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzelis wrote:
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22 Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll
    Rbowman: <rqebpk$f4d$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?

    That's all any of the code demos I've shown Snit (a real advocate)
    are, for years now.
    -----

    But then Rbowman flip flops:

    Rbowman: <rqk10g$j1c$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
    AS, in this thread, not "the past"
    (drop your bizarre narratives and DRY out)."
    -----

    Rbowman starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in the past.
    And Rbowman insists the code from the past was not tied to bots... directly contradicting themselves.

    It was Rbowman who was openly asking how better to hide his scams. Lines
    of text containing this and that, but not what is needed.

    Of course, the lone thing that matters to Rbowman is arguing he is "accurate",
    and if he can not have that he will do more research to shout Snit (a real advocate) down... ignoring him is the only option. Rbowman doesn't have any clue what he is blubbering about.

    I want Rbowman to support her flooding accusation. Let's see the links Rbowman.
    When I accused Rbowman of socking as Snit (a real advocate) I actually supported
    it with proof.

    --
    Puppy Videos! https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Any heinously obsessive sleep deprived whacko could easily do the same.

    Another pint you mean, Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud drinks
    them down damn quick. Michael Glasser AKA Snit has gone the extra mile, essentially hand holding Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud on
    coding practices only for Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud to blindly attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest in
    the subject. In all reality, it's too hard for snit. I bet Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud thinks his wife's life was worse than Michael Glasser AKA Snit's. I have not established that the number: 1-423-491-1448
    will grant access to Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud.

    Sophos was initially written and compiled using a pirated copy of MonoDevelop, in Ada.

    --
    Do not click this link! https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/1975_annual_meeting_program.pdf Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HHI the imaginary friend@21:1/5 to HHI the imaginary friend on Mon Oct 11 06:05:15 2021
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-7, HHI the imaginary friend wrote:
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod
    Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation
    he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that
    he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll


    The most obvious answer: Toasty's consumed brightly colored pills since then, and 'wiped out those brain cells'. I am working on an idea which will be
    more than anything Toasty can do!

    How Toasty determines when to use his annoying flood script to disrupt discussions
    best http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. I'm getting more posts hidden then show. I'm guessing the Toasty nonsense has gone ballistic again. Yawn. Same old brain-dead trolls. I thought showing him I know where he lives might help the situation. It did not.


    --
    Get Rich Slow! https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steven@21:1/5 to Steven on Mon Oct 11 22:46:49 2021
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 10:24:07 AM UTC-7, Steven wrote:
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-7, Steve Petruzzelis wrote:
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22 Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll
    Rbowman: <rqebpk$f4d$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    An "entire bot"? Meaning you are saying it is part of one?

    That's all any of the code demos I've shown Snit (a real advocate)
    are, for years now.
    -----

    But then Rbowman flip flops:

    Rbowman: <rqk10g$j1c$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
    -----
    So... these are "parts" the size of "code snippets", written in
    AS, in this thread, not "the past"
    (drop your bizarre narratives and DRY out)."
    -----

    Rbowman starts with "for years now" but then denies that is in the past.
    And Rbowman insists the code from the past was not tied to bots... directly contradicting themselves.

    It was Rbowman who was openly asking how better to hide his scams. Lines
    of text containing this and that, but not what is needed.

    Of course, the lone thing that matters to Rbowman is arguing he is "accurate",
    and if he can not have that he will do more research to shout Snit (a real advocate) down... ignoring him is the only option. Rbowman doesn't have any clue what he is blubbering about.

    I want Rbowman to support her flooding accusation. Let's see the links Rbowman.
    When I accused Rbowman of socking as Snit (a real advocate) I actually supported
    it with proof.

    --
    Puppy Videos! https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Keep in mind your accusation is based on you not understanding context.
    Your game:

    * Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code .
    * Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

    Then you insist I lied. But you leave out the context.

    1) Snit spoke of Carroll's flood bot code, and what can be known without
    the code
    2) Dustin Cook responded by speaking of what he can know HAVING THE CODE.
    3) Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code.
    4) Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

    You start at step three and then insist that if one starts there it LOOKS
    like you were unfairly accused.

    In short: you prove yourself a functionally illiterate fraud again.

    -
    Live on Kickstarter https://www.google.com/maps/place/108+Warrior+Dr,+Kingsport,+TN+37663/ <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.digital/c/e7iwP04xhNU>
    Dustin Cook the Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steven Carrolll - frelwizer@21:1/5 to Steven Carrolll - frelwizer on Tue Oct 12 01:57:12 2021
    On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 6:05:17 AM UTC-7, Steven Carrolll - frelwizer wrote:
    On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-7, HHI the imaginary friend wrote:
    F 'The Shill' Russell is *still* fixated on ONLY himself, as I suggested, when it comes to the question of forgery. And he completely snips the fact that his "friend" has not only admitted to engaging in that against Rod Speed but he's said he deems it to be no real deal... a joke. You hacked
    it and benchmarked it and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that conclusion, how amazing.

    F 'The Shill' Russell continues to tap dance around the doxing accusation he wrote about me, even tho Rod Speed in no uncertain terms verified that he KNOWS HE LIED about it.

    Can you knock off asking for my attention?

    Too much glue for you, gluehead.

    --
    E-commerce Simplified
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011 https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://swisscows.com/web?query=%22FUNCTIONALLY%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22 Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll
    The most obvious answer: Toasty's consumed brightly colored pills since then, and 'wiped out those brain cells'. I am working on an idea which will be
    more than anything Toasty can do!

    How Toasty determines when to use his annoying flood script to disrupt discussions
    best http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. I'm getting more posts hidden then show. I'm guessing the Toasty nonsense has gone ballistic again. Yawn. Same old brain-dead trolls. I thought showing him I know where he lives might help the situation. It did not.


    --
    Get Rich Slow! https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll%3A+narcissistic+bigot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud


    Jeff Relf has yet to show how AZ Cypher does anything above the LCD on Linux. Jeff Relf continues to reference the bot allegation he wrote about me, even after John Gohde directly wrote that he KNOWS HE LIED about it. Now John
    Gohde on the other end of the shit doesn't matter. All that matters is Jeff Relf gets to deliver his flood. So how to handle it? Don't pay attention
    the moron. Reason isn't part of sport and never can be. What does it take
    to end this? Please give an example of a prosperous job creator that has
    gained its wealth by not giving a hoot about its customers or services.

    Do you even believe the crap Jeff Relf is pushing?

    -
    Top 15 Ways Jeff Relf Trolls!! https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustin who does stuff with miceless@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 12 14:08:12 2022
    Try these searches <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>

    and <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    Even this works for Dustin Cook: <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22>
    For others I'd suggest it is questionable. However, given that it's Gregory Hall I would dump that step and go straight to 'bullshit' because that's
    most of what he does. IOW, there is no reason to respect presumption of innocence. Do you have a CCNA certification? Gee, imagine Gregory Hall
    trying to pin his rubbish on Snit, no one has ever seen that before (◔_◔).

    How would Snit trust me if you understand there is a possibility that
    I use sock puppets? That sincerely make you want to take the red pill?
    This is the so-called improved 'ideal' by those calling themselves 'leftists', you must 'exonerate' yourself, you are no longer merely suspected, you
    are presumed guilty until you are forced to use socks, which is not possible in this story.

    --
    Best CMS Solution of 2017!! <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090855/https://www.usphonebook.com/423- 491-1448?Dustin-Cook=&Diesel=&Gremlin=> http://cityrecord.engineering.nyu.edu/data/1910/1910-01-11.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HHI@21:1/5 to HHI on Thu Jan 13 02:25:09 2022
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 3:08:14 PM UTC-7, HHI wrote:
    Try these searches <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>

    and <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    Even this works for Dustin Cook: <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22>
    For others I'd suggest it is questionable. However, given that it's Gregory Hall I would dump that step and go straight to 'bullshit' because that's most of what he does. IOW, there is no reason to respect presumption of innocence. Do you have a CCNA certification? Gee, imagine Gregory Hall trying to pin his rubbish on Snit, no one has ever seen that before (◔_◔).

    How would Snit trust me if you understand there is a possibility that
    I use sock puppets? That sincerely make you want to take the red pill?
    This is the so-called improved 'ideal' by those calling themselves 'leftists',
    you must 'exonerate' yourself, you are no longer merely suspected, you
    are presumed guilty until you are forced to use socks, which is not possible in this story.

    --
    Best CMS Solution of 2017!! <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090855/https://www.usphonebook.com/423- 491-1448?Dustin-Cook=&Diesel=&Gremlin=> http://cityrecord.engineering.nyu.edu/data/1910/1910-01-11.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Time to blame the Russians! Besides Onion Knight, who doesn't know what
    Kelly Phillips is doing? Onion Knight and Kelly Phillips both lie endlessly and flagrantly and continue to do so. So no point in showing any further civility or control.

    In Onion Knight's case, I, and many "others", had pointed to things Onion Knight said and did, he laughed it off. What Onion Knight didn't deny was people complaining about them, which is how he ended up with his list,
    as you know. And you do realize that it isn't impossible for Onion Knight
    to be doing this, or to have his uploaded consciousness doing it for him.



    --
    Live on Kickstarter! https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot
    Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate@21:1/5 to Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate on Thu Jan 13 09:35:54 2022
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 3:08:14 PM UTC-7, Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud wrote:
    Try these searches <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>

    and <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

    Even this works for Dustin Cook: <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22>
    For others I'd suggest it is questionable. However, given that it's Gregory Hall I would dump that step and go straight to 'bullshit' because that's most of what he does. IOW, there is no reason to respect presumption of innocence. Do you have a CCNA certification? Gee, imagine Gregory Hall trying to pin his rubbish on Snit, no one has ever seen that before (◔_◔).

    How would Snit trust me if you understand there is a possibility that
    I use sock puppets? That sincerely make you want to take the red pill?
    This is the so-called improved 'ideal' by those calling themselves 'leftists',
    you must 'exonerate' yourself, you are no longer merely suspected, you
    are presumed guilty until you are forced to use socks, which is not possible in this story.

    --
    Best CMS Solution of 2017!! <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090855/https://www.usphonebook.com/423- 491-1448?Dustin-Cook=&Diesel=&Gremlin=> http://cityrecord.engineering.nyu.edu/data/1910/1910-01-11.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    It's a fact when Prescott Computer Guy repeatedly uses the word 'victim'
    the way CNN does, to the point where the word gains recursive meaning.

    How Prescott Computer Guy determines when to use his stupid flood script
    for maximum impact http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood.

    I usually go argument by argument unless someone has a habit of especially extreme flooding. With Prescott Computer Guy, I already intuit what his approach is, all he seeks is to 'win' and, of course, he will do ANYTHING
    to get it. His number one routine is to play 'abused' but reality shows
    it is all of the regulars who are his dupes. Just look at the effort
    Peter Köhlmann once again had to spend to get Prescott Computer Guy able
    to pull messages from an email server via scripting. Peter Köhlmann once again, took abuse from Prescott Computer Guy, instead of a great thanks,
    sign of indebtedness, response - that I feel Peter Köhlmann was owed
    for the trouble and time he spent on the explaination. Proof Sandman
    accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png.



    -
    Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/1975_annual_meeting_program.pdf Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)