1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.ADVOCACY

  • Re: Recommended cycling/walking app

    From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Wed Mar 29 05:37:06 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    And no. 100% charge is not good for Li-ion. Why Apple have their
    "smarts" to charge it to 80% ... leave it there, then top it to 100% in
    the time before one typically takes it off the charger. (iphones anyway
    - not sure about the Watch).

    optimized battery charging is also available on the watch.

    Just making the salient observation that those laughably puny sub par
    iPhone batteries suffer similarly due to Apple's el cheapo' batteries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Tue Mar 28 22:58:36 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2023-03-28 21:37, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    And no.  100% charge is not good for Li-ion.  Why Apple have their
    "smarts" to charge it to 80% ... leave it there, then top it to 100%
    in the time before one typically takes it off the charger. (iphones
    anyway - not sure about the Watch).

    optimized battery charging is also available on the watch.

    Just making the salient observation that those laughably puny sub par
    iPhone batteries suffer similarly due to Apple's el cheapo' batteries.

    You've yet to show that any Apple batteries are substantially different
    than the batteries used in other companies' products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to nospam@nospam.net on Wed Mar 29 08:30:06 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In article <u00f91$13p5l$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:


    And no. 100% charge is not good for Li-ion. Why Apple have their
    "smarts" to charge it to 80% ... leave it there, then top it to 100% in
    the time before one typically takes it off the charger. (iphones anyway
    - not sure about the Watch).

    optimized battery charging is also available on the watch.

    Just making the salient observation that those laughably puny sub par
    iPhone batteries suffer similarly due to Apple's el cheapo' batteries.

    yet you didn't make the salient observation that the apple watch does
    not use iphone batteries, nor have you observed that there's anything
    'cheapo' about any of them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Mar 29 16:47:14 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2023-03-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-03-28 21:37, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    And no.  100% charge is not good for Li-ion.  Why Apple have their
    "smarts" to charge it to 80% ... leave it there, then top it to
    100% in the time before one typically takes it off the charger.
    (iphones anyway - not sure about the Watch).

    optimized battery charging is also available on the watch.

    Just making the salient observation that those laughably puny sub par
    iPhone batteries suffer similarly due to Apple's el cheapo'
    batteries.

    You've yet to show that any Apple batteries are substantially
    different than the batteries used in other companies' products.

    No such proof exists. He's just trolling as usual.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)