For those of you who have been call lying little shits by Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how Alan finds time to actually earn a living since he spends so much time trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to abuse. A quicksearch showed his trolling in these groups over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1successful the cajones to send to his company, some timestamped working hours posts. Not, me, not going there.
comp.sys.mac.advocacy
alt.privacy
can.politics
misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming
alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats
misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine
comp.mobile.android
rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer, not himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling USENET looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who disagree. I wish someone would have the time to document, and if
LOL
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:quick search showed his trolling in these groups over the last few years:
For those of you who have been call lying little shits by Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how Alan finds time to actually earn a living since he spends so much time trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to abuse. A
successful the cajones to send to his company, some timestamped working hours posts. Not, me, not going there.rec.autos.sport.f1
comp.sys.mac.advocacy
alt.privacy
can.politics
misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming
alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats
misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine
comp.mobile.android
rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer, not himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling USENET looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who disagree. I wish someone would have the time to document, and if
LOLWow.
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this morning, aren't you?
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shits by AlanWow.
Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how Alan finds
time to actually earn a living since he spends so much time
trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to abuse. A quick
search showed his trolling in these groups over the last few
years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer, not
himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling USENET
looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who disagree.
I wish someone would have the time to document, and if successful
the cajones to send to his company, some timestamped working
hours posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this morning, aren't
you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh left here.
That is other than a few worthless trollers. Hmmmmmm, what does that
say about us?
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shits by AlanWow.
Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how Alan finds
time to actually earn a living since he spends so much time
trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to abuse. A quick
search showed his trolling in these groups over the last few
years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer, not
himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling USENET
looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who disagree.
I wish someone would have the time to document, and if successful
the cajones to send to his company, some timestamped working
hours posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this morning, aren't
you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh left here.I wouldn't care to speculate.
That is other than a few worthless trollers. Hmmmmmm, what does that
say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations and call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:51:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I wouldn't care to speculate.
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shits byWow.
Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how
Alan finds time to actually earn a living since he spends so
much time trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to
abuse. A quick search showed his trolling in these groups
over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer,
not himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling
USENET looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who
disagree. I wish someone would have the time to document, and
if successful the cajones to send to his company, some
timestamped working hours posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this morning,
aren't you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh left
here. That is other than a few worthless trollers. Hmmmmmm, what
does that say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations and
call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
All I know about you is that you feel free to abuse based on your
assumptions of intent.
Did you ever brag about being a millionaire in a certain golf forum?
As for honesty, please tell us the truth about why you are now
working for a consulting company. Please tell us what you did for a
living out in Ontario right after you left high school. Please tell
us why you only went to college for 1 year. Please tell us why you
pulled up roots and went to BC. Please tell us who paid for your 500
square foot $100+k (original price) condo. Please tell us what
happened to your bakerMEDIA gig. Please tell us why your FB posts are
not shared with the world.
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional. OMG, you could have at least put
on a clean shirt. BTW I'd love to see the rest of the condo. What's
in the background is not very attractive.
A professional's head shot looks like this http://tiny.cc/5ml2vz
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
On 2022-12-29 06:24, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:51:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:I wouldn't care to speculate.
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shits byWow.
Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't know how
Alan finds time to actually earn a living since he spends so
much time trolling newsgroups looking for opportunities to
abuse. A quick search showed his trolling in these groups
over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android rec.arts.sf.written
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an employer,
not himself. That way he can draw a salary while trolling
USENET looking for opportunities to hurl insults at those who
disagree. I wish someone would have the time to document, and
if successful the cajones to send to his company, some
timestamped working hours posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this morning,
aren't you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh left
here. That is other than a few worthless trollers. Hmmmmmm, what
does that say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations and
call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
All I know about you is that you feel free to abuse based on your assumptions of intent.
Did you ever brag about being a millionaire in a certain golf forum?
As for honesty, please tell us the truth about why you are now
working for a consulting company. Please tell us what you did for a
living out in Ontario right after you left high school. Please tell
us why you only went to college for 1 year. Please tell us why you
pulled up roots and went to BC. Please tell us who paid for your 500 square foot $100+k (original price) condo. Please tell us what
happened to your bakerMEDIA gig. Please tell us why your FB posts are
not shared with the world.
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional. OMG, you could have at least put
on a clean shirt. BTW I'd love to see the rest of the condo. What's
in the background is not very attractive.
A professional's head shot looks like this http://tiny.cc/5ml2vz
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that bodySo you went trolling through an entire site to find a post that I put up quickly as a test and failed to remove.
language speaks louder than words?
Bravo, Lying Little Shit!
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 12:20:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-29 06:24, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:51:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:So you went trolling through an entire site to find a post that I
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, AlanI wouldn't care to speculate.
wrote:
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shitsWow.
by Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't
know how Alan finds time to actually earn a living since
he spends so much time trolling newsgroups looking for
opportunities to abuse. A quick search showed his
trolling in these groups over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android
rec.arts.sf.written microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an
employer, not himself. That way he can draw a salary
while trolling USENET looking for opportunities to hurl
insults at those who disagree. I wish someone would have
the time to document, and if successful the cajones to
send to his company, some timestamped working hours
posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this
morning, aren't you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh
left here. That is other than a few worthless trollers.
Hmmmmmm, what does that say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations
and call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
All I know about you is that you feel free to abuse based on
your assumptions of intent.
Did you ever brag about being a millionaire in a certain golf
forum?
As for honesty, please tell us the truth about why you are now
working for a consulting company. Please tell us what you did for
a living out in Ontario right after you left high school. Please
tell us why you only went to college for 1 year. Please tell us
why you pulled up roots and went to BC. Please tell us who paid
for your 500 square foot $100+k (original price) condo. Please
tell us what happened to your bakerMEDIA gig. Please tell us why
your FB posts are not shared with the world.
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional. OMG, you could have at least
put on a clean shirt. BTW I'd love to see the rest of the condo.
What's in the background is not very attractive.
A professional's head shot looks like this http://tiny.cc/5ml2vz
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all
genuine, that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do
you actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that
body language speaks louder than words?
put up quickly as a test and failed to remove.
Bravo, Lying Little Shit!
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in
an email I received yesterday. We have quite the offline discussion
going on about your history of abuse of other people in various
newsgroups. I have never seen that post myself. Thanks for confirming
that you made it. Regardless of intent you posted a grossly
inaccurate lie. I also learned that you really posted a video
supposedly showing you depositing $1000 at an ATM.
More juicy stuff in that conversation too. More of that later. You
have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items
above. Asshole.
So here is my theory of one item based on timing of life events you
supplied. There is no way a single guy left an Ontario job, moved to
BC, bought a Vancouver condo, and then set up a new company with no
customer base, all without some outside help. No bank would write
that mortgage without assurances of income. Most likely a family
member fronted money and/or cosigned a mortgage. Or, maybe family
bought the condo and you made payments to that person.
Why is bakerMEDIA no longer paying the bills?
Did your foul mouth
finally do you in or was it incompetence? > If your company was making
you a great living why are you working for a company? I notice too
that 2018 was the year you bought a race car and went to work for
Digtal Financial. Coincidence that you needed to do that???? LoL.
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.
On 2022-12-29 19:07, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 12:20:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-29 06:24, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:51:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:So you went trolling through an entire site to find a post that I
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, AlanI wouldn't care to speculate.
wrote:
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shitsWow.
by Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't
know how Alan finds time to actually earn a living since
he spends so much time trolling newsgroups looking for
opportunities to abuse. A quick search showed his
trolling in these groups over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android
rec.arts.sf.written microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an
employer, not himself. That way he can draw a salary
while trolling USENET looking for opportunities to hurl
insults at those who disagree. I wish someone would have
the time to document, and if successful the cajones to
send to his company, some timestamped working hours
posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this
morning, aren't you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh
left here. That is other than a few worthless trollers.
Hmmmmmm, what does that say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations
and call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
All I know about you is that you feel free to abuse based on
your assumptions of intent.
Did you ever brag about being a millionaire in a certain golf
forum?
As for honesty, please tell us the truth about why you are now
working for a consulting company. Please tell us what you did for
a living out in Ontario right after you left high school. Please
tell us why you only went to college for 1 year. Please tell us
why you pulled up roots and went to BC. Please tell us who paid
for your 500 square foot $100+k (original price) condo. Please
tell us what happened to your bakerMEDIA gig. Please tell us why
your FB posts are not shared with the world.
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional. OMG, you could have at least
put on a clean shirt. BTW I'd love to see the rest of the condo.
What's in the background is not very attractive.
A professional's head shot looks like this http://tiny.cc/5ml2vz
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all
genuine, that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do
you actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that
body language speaks louder than words?
put up quickly as a test and failed to remove.
Bravo, Lying Little Shit!
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you inHey, great!
an email I received yesterday. We have quite the offline discussion
going on about your history of abuse of other people in various newsgroups. I have never seen that post myself. Thanks for confirming
that you made it. Regardless of intent you posted a grossly
inaccurate lie. I also learned that you really posted a video
supposedly showing you depositing $1000 at an ATM.
More stalking!
More juicy stuff in that conversation too. More of that later. YouAnd you just assume it's all true, don't you, you Lying Little Shit!
have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other itemsNow why would I answer any question you asked, Lying Little Shit
above. Asshole.
So here is my theory of one item based on timing of life events you supplied. There is no way a single guy left an Ontario job, moved toWhy should I address any of your false assumptions, Lying Little Shit.
BC, bought a Vancouver condo, and then set up a new company with no customer base, all without some outside help. No bank would write
that mortgage without assurances of income. Most likely a family
member fronted money and/or cosigned a mortgage. Or, maybe family
bought the condo and you made payments to that person.
Why is bakerMEDIA no longer paying the bills?Who says it isn't, Lying Little Shit?
Did your foul mouthYes, yes! More assumptions without any basis!
finally do you in or was it incompetence? > If your company was making
you a great living why are you working for a company? I notice too
that 2018 was the year you bought a race car and went to work for
Digtal Financial. Coincidence that you needed to do that???? LoL.
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
-hh
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on the Digital Financial site?
Those are the current norm, ...
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:45:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:embarrassing.
On 2022-12-29 19:07, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 12:20:04 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-29 06:24, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:51:23 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:So you went trolling through an entire site to find a post that I
On 2022-12-15 15:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 12:28:55 PM UTC-5, AlanI wouldn't care to speculate.
wrote:
On 2022-12-12 07:38, Thomas E. wrote:
For those of you who have been call lying little shitsWow.
by Alan Baker rest assured you are not alone. I don't
know how Alan finds time to actually earn a living since
he spends so much time trolling newsgroups looking for
opportunities to abuse. A quick search showed his
trolling in these groups over the last few years:
rec.autos.sport.f1 comp.sys.mac.advocacy alt.privacy
can.politics misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.usa.republican alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
alt.global-warming alt.politics.republican
alt.politics.democrats misc.phone.mobile.iphone
rec.skiing.alpine comp.mobile.android
rec.arts.sf.written microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
This MIGHT explain why Alan is now working for an
employer, not himself. That way he can draw a salary
while trolling USENET looking for opportunities to hurl
insults at those who disagree. I wish someone would have
the time to document, and if successful the cajones to
send to his company, some timestamped working hours
posts. Not, me, not going there.
LOL
You're really quite the butt-hurt little shit this
morning, aren't you?
You know there is pretty much nobody but you, me and Hugh
left here. That is other than a few worthless trollers.
Hmmmmmm, what does that say about us?
What I know about you is that you'll take your speculations
and call it fact.
That's why you're the lying little shit you are.
All I know about you is that you feel free to abuse based on
your assumptions of intent.
Did you ever brag about being a millionaire in a certain golf
forum?
As for honesty, please tell us the truth about why you are now
working for a consulting company. Please tell us what you did for
a living out in Ontario right after you left high school. Please
tell us why you only went to college for 1 year. Please tell us
why you pulled up roots and went to BC. Please tell us who paid
for your 500 square foot $100+k (original price) condo. Please
tell us what happened to your bakerMEDIA gig. Please tell us why
your FB posts are not shared with the world.
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional. OMG, you could have at least
put on a clean shirt. BTW I'd love to see the rest of the condo.
What's in the background is not very attractive.
A professional's head shot looks like this http://tiny.cc/5ml2vz
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all
genuine, that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do
you actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that
body language speaks louder than words?
put up quickly as a test and failed to remove.
Bravo, Lying Little Shit!
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you inHey, great!
an email I received yesterday. We have quite the offline discussion going on about your history of abuse of other people in various newsgroups. I have never seen that post myself. Thanks for confirming that you made it. Regardless of intent you posted a grossly
inaccurate lie. I also learned that you really posted a video
supposedly showing you depositing $1000 at an ATM.
More stalking!
More juicy stuff in that conversation too. More of that later. YouAnd you just assume it's all true, don't you, you Lying Little Shit!
have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Now why would I answer any question you asked, Lying Little Shit
So here is my theory of one item based on timing of life events you supplied. There is no way a single guy left an Ontario job, moved toWhy should I address any of your false assumptions, Lying Little Shit.
BC, bought a Vancouver condo, and then set up a new company with no customer base, all without some outside help. No bank would write
that mortgage without assurances of income. Most likely a family
member fronted money and/or cosigned a mortgage. Or, maybe family
bought the condo and you made payments to that person.
Why is bakerMEDIA no longer paying the bills?Who says it isn't, Lying Little Shit?
Did your foul mouthYes, yes! More assumptions without any basis!
finally do you in or was it incompetence? > If your company was making you a great living why are you working for a company? I notice too
that 2018 was the year you bought a race car and went to work for
Digtal Financial. Coincidence that you needed to do that???? LoL.
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.Stalking? Just asking a few questions about events you have made public in this group, on LinkedIn and looking at pictures you have posted. And what do I get? No answers, just insults. Why? Almost certainly if you answer with the truth it's
I have applied for several mortgages in my day. A basic metric for getting a mortgage is ability to pay back the money. There you are, freshly arrived in one of the most expensive housing markets in North America. This after moving from job to job inOntario. You claim to have started up bakerMEDIA after records show you bought the condo. No record of long term employment, no record of a Vancouver job. Wow I ask, how did that happen? According to my sources your mother helped support you after you
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on the Digital Financial site?Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
-hh
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurish
condo interior selfie?
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurish
condo interior selfie?
It is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
-hh
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
-hh
On 2022-12-30 09:59, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurish
condo interior selfie?
It is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
-hhMeh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
On 2022-12-30 09:59, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you >>>>>>> in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet
they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any otherOh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and >>>>>> you should have
items above. Asshole.
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved
for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own
portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a
hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th
Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The
comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch
merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already
changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a
2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital
2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D
VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry
and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my
own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me
specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be
looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but
other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding,
electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed
professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those
attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a
subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's
post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert
in that amateurish
condo interior selfie?
It is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd
say that Alan would
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas
I'm trying not to.
-hh
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
I'm retired from consulting ...
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for family
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.
Hope he changes it.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 3:55:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
Yup. It illustrates how the workplace has evolved with teleworking. My own setup
hasn't been fancy ... just a framed print backdrop, but it has a useful note tagged on it
that's only visible when I'm not in the chair:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/BRB.jpg>
I'm retired from consulting ...
Which then makes your headshot pic even more obsolete and irrelevant.
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for familyWith what appears to be a chronological listing, suggesting that 'Costa Rica in January'
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
means next month, and those that follow are 2023 plans subject to change as well.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
To assuage your fears, others have been traveling too .. just not advertising it here on COLA.
Case in point:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220523-1303-beach.jpeg> <https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/France/2022FR_Eugisheim.jpg>
Plus much of the 'hobby' year was busy with a project that I've also not talked much about.
But suffice that 'Stage II' is now complete.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.Doesn't matter when you'll invariably contrive some sort of criticism to whine about.
Hope he changes it.
Even a formal portrait headshot just like yours, you'll then complain that the color
of the background isn't exactly the same shade! /s
-hh
Looks good to me.
Speaking of theories, how about theories being used to extrapolate into imagined lies based on 0 personal experience, actual observation and limited knowledge? Like these:
15 touch and goes in an hour of logged flight time
correct use of roundabout lanes in Carmel Indiana
auto structural impingement into the passenger area in a crash
a new 16" Apple Mac dying 14 days after purchase
On 2022-12-30 10:21, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-30 09:59, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you >>>>>>> in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet
they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any otherOh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and >>>>>> you should have
items above. Asshole.
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved >>>>>> for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own
portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a >>>>>> hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th >>>>>> Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The >>>> comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch
merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already
changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a >>>> 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital
2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D
VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry
and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my >>>> own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me
specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be
looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but
other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding,
electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed
professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those
attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a
subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's
post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert
in that amateurish
condo interior selfie?
It is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd
say that Alan would
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me. >>Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas
I'm trying not to.
-hh
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 3:55:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
Yup. It illustrates how the workplace has evolved with teleworking. My own setup
hasn't been fancy ... just a framed print backdrop, but it has a useful note tagged on it
that's only visible when I'm not in the chair:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/BRB.jpg>
I'm retired from consulting ...
Which then makes your headshot pic even more obsolete and irrelevant.
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for family
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
With what appears to be a chronological listing, suggesting that 'Costa Rica in January'
means next month, and those that follow are 2023 plans subject to change as well.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
To assuage your fears, others have been traveling too .. just not advertising it here on COLA.
Case in point:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220523-1303-beach.jpeg> <https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/France/2022FR_Eugisheim.jpg>
Plus much of the 'hobby' year was busy with a project that I've also not talked much about.
But suffice that 'Stage II' is now complete.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.
Hope he changes it.
Doesn't matter when you'll invariably contrive some sort of criticism to whine about.
Even a formal portrait headshot just like yours, you'll then complain that the color
of the background isn't exactly the same shade! /s
My God Hugh, you complain about travel plans being plans then accuse me of contriving criticism. LOL!
The point about the portrait was that is was suitable for a purpose at a point in time,
not my current situation. I don't have a company website to post to these days. It went
away more than a year ago.
I've not advertised my travel here either, at least until you implied that I'm a stay-at-home dinosaur.
Actually the picture of Alan on the Who We Are company page is OK, and similar to other staff shown on the site.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:attributes. Also, the picture was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on the Digital Financial site?
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
-hh
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position. The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurish condo interior selfie? He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
On 2022-12-31 09:19, Thomas E. wrote:
Looks good to me.
Speaking of theories, how about theories being used to extrapolate into imagined lies based on 0 personal experience, actual observation and limited knowledge? Like these:
15 touch and goes in an hour of logged flight timeInformation offered by YOU.
correct use of roundabout lanes in Carmel IndianaInformation offered by YOU
auto structural impingement into the passenger area in a crashInformation offered by YOU
a new 16" Apple Mac dying 14 days after purchaseInformation offered by YOU.
Do you sense a theme here, stalker?
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:01:48 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 3:55:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.
Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
Yup. It illustrates how the workplace has evolved with teleworking. My own setup
hasn't been fancy ... just a framed print backdrop, but it has a useful note tagged on it
that's only visible when I'm not in the chair:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/BRB.jpg>
I'm retired from consulting ...
Which then makes your headshot pic even more obsolete and irrelevant.
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for family
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
With what appears to be a chronological listing, suggesting that 'Costa Rica in January'
means next month, and those that follow are 2023 plans subject to change as well.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
To assuage your fears, others have been traveling too .. just not advertising it here on COLA.
Case in point:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220523-1303-beach.jpeg> <https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/France/2022FR_Eugisheim.jpg>
Plus much of the 'hobby' year was busy with a project that I've also not talked much about.
But suffice that 'Stage II' is now complete.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.
Hope he changes it.
Doesn't matter when you'll invariably contrive some sort of criticism to whine about.
Even a formal portrait headshot just like yours, you'll then complain that the color
of the background isn't exactly the same shade! /s
My God Hugh, you complain about travel plans being plans then accuse me of contriving criticism. LOL!Considering that they were totally out of the blue, it was a transparent brag attempt.
FWIW, I could also list my plans too, with our dead 2020 list (thanks CoVid) to illustrate.
It was: Spring/Montreal (weekend) & TN; Summer/Norway(Svalbard cruise?); Fall/South
Africa (DM), & Brac (S+K); Late/Australia (D+S), plus the short list also had: New Zealand
(south island); Spain; Croatia. This is now going to be inputs into our 2023 formulations,
with of course flexibility to adapt/pivot, like last month's trip to France, which initially started
with a different EU destination.
The point about the portrait was that is was suitable for a purpose at a point in time,Which means you're now admitting that it is a relic of the past...dinosaur.
not my current situation. I don't have a company website to post to these days. It went
away more than a year ago.
I've not advertised my travel here either, at least until you implied that I'm a stay-at-home dinosaur.No, the "dinosaur" was in the context of technologically driven social change.
Actually the picture of Alan on the Who We Are company page is OK, and similar to other staff shown on the site.What, no complaint that no eyeglasses, so it could be deceptive? /s
-hh
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 3:55:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
...
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
Yup. It illustrates how the workplace has evolved with teleworking. My own setup
hasn't been fancy ... just a framed print backdrop, but it has a useful note tagged on it
that's only visible when I'm not in the chair:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/BRB.jpg>
I'm retired from consulting ...
Which then makes your headshot pic even more obsolete and irrelevant.
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for familyWith what appears to be a chronological listing, suggesting that 'Costa Rica in January'
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
means next month, and those that follow are 2023 plans subject to change as well.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
To assuage your fears, others have been traveling too .. just not advertising it here on COLA.
Case in point:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220523-1303-beach.jpeg> <https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/France/2022FR_Eugisheim.jpg>
Plus much of the 'hobby' year was busy with a project that I've also not talked much about.
But suffice that 'Stage II' is now complete.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.Doesn't matter when you'll invariably contrive some sort of criticism to whine about.
Hope he changes it.
Even a formal portrait headshot just like yours, you'll then complain that the color
of the background isn't exactly the same shade! /s
-hh
On 12/30/2022 8:30 AM, Thomas E. wrote:attributes. Also, the picture was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>> ...So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures on the Digital Financial site?
Translation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
-hh
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position. The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurish condo interior selfie? He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me.Trolls normally do not dress or look professional.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 3:55:28 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 12:59:29 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 11:30:52 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:58:40 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:The attributes & messages is that of a ''dinosaur", not of today's post-Information Age.
On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:05:50 AM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:07:11 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 10:07:35 PM UTC-5, Thomas E. wrote: >>>>>>>>> ...
So how does that selfie in his condo compare to the other professionals' pictures onTranslation: another sore butthurt bag of resentment.
Actually another person active on that golf forum snitched on you in an email I received yesterday.
You have a lot of people who despise you and want to talk.Translation: they know they can't do a damn thing about it, yet they still whine.
I note that you totally deflected from replying to any other items above. Asshole.Oh, such as a headshot composition troll? That really was lame and you should have
known better, as every industry and every generation has evolved for just what can be
acceptable or not ... case in point, why is it that your own portrait a photo instead of an
oil painting? Likewise, why aren't you wearing black, and with a hat (black) & a white lace
collar? Just because you're not Dutch, nor its no longer the 17th Century isn't an excuse:
<https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/frans-hals-dutch-c1582-1583-1666.html#slide_5>
the Digital Financial site?
Don't know, don't care, as that wasn't the point of the comment. The comment was
noting that standards aren't fixed but they change. The 17C Dutch merchant portraits
exploited time so as to emphasize just how much things have already changed, and
will continue to change. Even the medium is illustrative: what was a 2D projection
on oils has migrated through B&W and Color film to now be a digital 2D image, and
it probably isn't long until it moves again, perhaps to a 3D VR/hologram representation.
Those are the current norm, ...
No, it is what *you* think the 'current norm' is from your industry and expectations.
That's also why when I look at your volunteered portrait pic from my own profession
perspective, I see elements within your visage which tells me specific things about you,
some of which may be immediately disqualifying for what I may be looking to hire...
...and I'm not talking about gender, race, age of the "you", but other elements therein.
That's true. I'm not looking for a truck driving, welding, electrician, or lawn care position.
The image is what I was at the time, an educated well-dressed professional in good health
looking for consulting opportunities a field that requires those attributes. Also, the picture
was taken by a professional photographer, which in itself sends a subtle message.
Do you actually think Alan looks like a professional computer expert in that amateurishIt is a lot warmer & humanistic and appropriate to the product. I'd say that Alan would
condo interior selfie?
get a higher score by Room Rater than you would.
He looks like a Gen Y mom's basement-dweller Usenet-addicted geek to me. >>>> Because you've surrendered to being one of those dinosaurs, whereas I'm trying not to.
Really? Room rater?
Yup. It illustrates how the workplace has evolved with teleworking. My own setup
hasn't been fancy ... just a framed print backdrop, but it has a useful note tagged on it
that's only visible when I'm not in the chair:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/BRB.jpg>
I'm retired from consulting ...
Which then makes your headshot pic even more obsolete and irrelevant.
We have started traveling again. East Coast and Canada in September, Atlanta for familyWith what appears to be a chronological listing, suggesting that 'Costa Rica in January'
Christmas, Costa Rica in January, Beaver Creek skiing Feb-March, probably at least one trip
to Europe this year.
means next month, and those that follow are 2023 plans subject to change as well.
...No Hugh, we are living the dream. Travel, hobbies, family...love it.
To assuage your fears, others have been traveling too .. just not advertising it here on COLA.
Case in point:
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220523-1303-beach.jpeg>
<https://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2022/France/2022FR_Eugisheim.jpg>
Plus much of the 'hobby' year was busy with a project that I've also not talked much about.
But suffice that 'Stage II' is now complete.
Read Alan's reply related to that condo picture. He forgot it was on the site.Doesn't matter when you'll invariably contrive some sort of criticism to whine about.
Hope he changes it.
Even a formal portrait headshot just like yours, you'll then complain that the color
of the background isn't exactly the same shade! /s
-hh
I would only add that Alan immediately replaced that photo on the company site with one more suitable.
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 1:12:51 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-31 09:19, Thomas E. wrote:
Looks good to me.Information offered by YOU.
Speaking of theories, how about theories being used to
extrapolate into imagined lies based on 0 personal experience,
actual observation and limited knowledge? Like these:
15 touch and goes in an hour of logged flight time
correct use of roundabout lanes in Carmel IndianaInformation offered by YOU
auto structural impingement into the passenger area in a crashInformation offered by YOU
a new 16" Apple Mac dying 14 days after purchaseInformation offered by YOU.
Do you sense a theme here, stalker?
The point being that in each instance you conjured up a "lie" based
on no first-hand observation or relevant experience. This is how you
attempt to destroy those who dare doubt you.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 63:44:38 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,355,976 |
