...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress withYou replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing
or intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more
incidents that involves repeated or continuing harassment of
another person that would cause him or her to suffer emotional
distress and actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant
statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress
with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that
record?
last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your
own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to
somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest
& petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much
the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little
Shit?
Never saw that one.
I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by
not telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not
telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress withYou replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own
harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
BTW, does your employer know you are trolling USENET during working hours?
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own
harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not
telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering this “never saw it”
question now that it has been specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering this “never saw it”
question now that it has been specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
-hh
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:30:25 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 10:28, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:More non-threat threats, you Lying Little Shit?
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made since
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting of two
or more incidents that involves repeated or continuing
harassment of another person that would cause him or her to
suffer emotional distress and actually causes such
distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant
statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I
send that record?
you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop
your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts
to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being
dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty
much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying
Little Shit?
BTW, does your employer know you are trolling USENET during
working hours?
Alan, I need to school you in privacy rights and social media. The
principle is "reasonable expectation of privacy".
On 2022-11-28 10:28, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents
that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person
that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with >>> your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own
harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the
same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
BTW, does your employer know you are trolling USENET during working hours?More non-threat threats, you Lying Little Shit?
On 2022-11-28 15:38, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:30:25 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 10:28, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:More non-threat threats, you Lying Little Shit?
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made since
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting of two
or more incidents that involves repeated or continuing
harassment of another person that would cause him or her to
suffer emotional distress and actually causes such
distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant
statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I
send that record?
you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop
your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts
to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being
dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty
much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying
Little Shit?
BTW, does your employer know you are trolling USENET during
working hours?
Alan, I need to school you in privacy rights and social media. The principle is "reasonable expectation of privacy".You really don't, you Lying Little Shit.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:13:08 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 15:38, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:30:25 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You really don't, you Lying Little Shit.
On 2022-11-28 10:28, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, AlanMore non-threat threats, you Lying Little Shit?
wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting of
two or more incidents that involves repeated or
continuing harassment of another person that would
cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the
relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying. Where
do I send that record?
since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to
stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move
goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re
just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty"
pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit",
you Lying Little Shit?
BTW, does your employer know you are trolling USENET during
working hours?
Alan, I need to school you in privacy rights and social media.
The principle is "reasonable expectation of privacy".
Apparently, you do need schooling. I'll not be contacting your
employer, but legally I could send a few snips with time stamps to
Digital Financial.
BTW You really should change your LinkedIn photo to the one on your
company's site. The LinkedIn version is downright scary.
So Alan, it was you who harassed me on certain student pilot logbook
entries that I made public. Right? You stridently claimed, based on
no relevant experience or factual foundation, that I could not do 15
touch and goes in an hour. This despite the fact that I did not make
the logbook entries. Those were done and signed by my flight
instructor. I did not count landings. I was way too busy flying the
airplane. I trusted the instructor to make the entries. If questioned
I would have deferred to him.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or
intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents >> that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person >> that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute? >>
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress withYou replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last posted yesterday...
your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering this “never saw it”
question now that it has been specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:32:00 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last >>>>> posted yesterday...
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or >>>>>>> intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents >>>>>>> that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person >>>>>>> that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute? >>>>>>>
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with >>>>>> your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record?
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own >>>>> harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere
basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?" >>>>>
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the >>>>> same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not >>>> telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering this “never saw it”
question now that it has been specifically highlighted and acknowledged… >>>
…how about it?
That’s not answering the question posed.
Insofar as dishonesty, I see the seeking out and posting of public information
which were not posted here by their owner as constituting harassing actions, particularly when their owner objected to agreeing to have them republished in
a new location/medium/etc.
And heartening way back to student flight records, please refresh my recollections,
as I don’t feel like looking it up right now: I thought the point was that those “15 in
an hour” was represented as timestamped accurately, but upon retrospective examination, didn’t appear particularly plausible to be what was being claimed.
-hh
On 2022-11-29 11:20, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:32:00 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E. wrote:I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here, you are by not
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as knowing or >>>>>>> intentional course of conduct consisting of two or more incidents >>>>>>> that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person >>>>>>> that would cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the relevant statute? >>>>>>>
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional distress with >>>>>> your unfounded accusations of lying. Where do I send that record? >>>>> You replied to every post made to you / about you made since you last >>>>> posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to stop your own >>>>> harassment, or are you going to try to move goalposts to somewhere >>>>> basically irrelevant because you’re just being dishonest & petty?" >>>>>
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty" pretty much the >>>>> same as saying he is a "Lying Little Shit", you Lying Little Shit? >>>>
telling the whole truth, you lying little shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering this “never saw it”
question now that it has been specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
That’s not answering the question posed.
Insofar as dishonesty, I see the seeking out and posting of public information
which were not posted here by their owner as constituting harassing actions,
particularly when their owner objected to agreeing to have them republished in
a new location/medium/etc.
And heartening way back to student flight records, please refresh my recollections,
as I don’t feel like looking it up right now: I thought the point was that those “15 in
an hour” was represented as timestamped accurately, but upon retrospective
examination, didn’t appear particularly plausible to be what was being claimed.
-hhAnd those records were explicitly made available by him in order to
discuss them:
'June 8, 2015, 8:11:20 PM
Just FYI, this is what it takes to get to that first solo, and safely.'
So the Lying Little Shit put them into CSMA and thus, up for discussion.
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:13:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 11:20, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:32:00 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.And those records were explicitly made available by him in order
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting
of two or more incidents that involves repeated or
continuing harassment of another person that would
cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the
relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying.
Where do I send that record?
since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to
stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move
goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because
you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty"
pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little
Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here,
you are by not telling the whole truth, you lying little
shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering
this “never saw it” question now that it has been
specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
That’s not answering the question posed.
Insofar as dishonesty, I see the seeking out and posting of
public information which were not posted here by their owner as
constituting harassing actions, particularly when their owner
objected to agreeing to have them republished in a new
location/medium/etc.
And heartening way back to student flight records, please refresh
my recollections, as I don’t feel like looking it up right now: I
thought the point was that those “15 in an hour” was represented
as timestamped accurately, but upon retrospective examination,
didn’t appear particularly plausible to be what was being
claimed.
-hh
to discuss them:
'June 8, 2015, 8:11:20 PM
Just FYI, this is what it takes to get to that first solo, and
safely.'
So the Lying Little Shit put them into CSMA and thus, up for
discussion.
Liar! There is no set minimum number of landings required for solo.
As for your documented facts, those were also published by you and up
for discussion. Example, you gave out your company address as your
home address. That makes you easy to find. Google Earth. Example,
your posts on race results, problems with your old Kent engine, your
LinkedIn info, FaceBook's favorite quote, etc.
Precisely what have I discussed that was not first obtained from
you?
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:19:32 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-05 14:40, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:13:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:Where did I say there was a set minimum, you lying little shit. I just
On 2022-11-29 11:20, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:32:00 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.And those records were explicitly made available by him in order
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting
of two or more incidents that involves repeated or
continuing harassment of another person that would
cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the
relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying.
Where do I send that record?
since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to
stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move
goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because
you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty"
pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little
Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here,
you are by not telling the whole truth, you lying little
shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering
this “never saw it” question now that it has been
specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
That’s not answering the question posed.
Insofar as dishonesty, I see the seeking out and posting of
public information which were not posted here by their owner as
constituting harassing actions, particularly when their owner
objected to agreeing to have them republished in a new
location/medium/etc.
And heartening way back to student flight records, please refresh
my recollections, as I don’t feel like looking it up right now: I
thought the point was that those “15 in an hour” was represented >>>>> as timestamped accurately, but upon retrospective examination,
didn’t appear particularly plausible to be what was being
claimed.
-hh
to discuss them:
'June 8, 2015, 8:11:20 PM
Just FYI, this is what it takes to get to that first solo, and
safely.'
So the Lying Little Shit put them into CSMA and thus, up for
discussion.
Liar! There is no set minimum number of landings required for solo.
quoted
This was about the fact that you're comparing you offering up
information for anyone who reads CSMA to peruse as equivalent to you
deciding to my any and all personal information of mine you care to find
here.
<snipping your complete deflection>
As for your documented facts, those were also published by you and upI didn't offer them up here, Lying Little Shit.
for discussion. Example, you gave out your company address as your
home address. That makes you easy to find. Google Earth. Example,
your posts on race results, problems with your old Kent engine, your
LinkedIn info, FaceBook's favorite quote, etc.
There is a difference between someone saying "Here: take a look at these
things about me" and you scouring the net for my personal information
and offering up here.
Irrelevant, Lying Little Shit.
Precisely what have I discussed that was not first obtained from
you?
<further irrelevancies snipped>
Ah, I missed the single quotes in what you posted.
On 2022-12-05 14:40, Thomas E. wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 3:13:35 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 11:20, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:32:00 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.And those records were explicitly made available by him in order
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 1:28:03 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:19:24 PM UTC+1, Thomas E.I am going to back off a bit. However, I am not being
wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:54:32 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-11-28 06:50, Thomas E. wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:10:39 PM UTC-5, AlanYou replied to every post made to you / about you made
wrote:
...according to the laws in...
...well let's use Indiana!
"Criminal Stalking under Indiana Statute
Under Ind. Code § 35-45-10-1, stalking is defined as
knowing or intentional course of conduct consisting
of two or more incidents that involves repeated or
continuing harassment of another person that would
cause him or her to suffer emotional distress and
actually causes such distress."
I wonder if anyone else here has checked out the
relevant statute?
:-)
OH Alan, for over 10 years you have caused me emotional
distress with your unfounded accusations of lying.
Where do I send that record?
since you last posted yesterday...
...except this one:
"Well Tom? Is this a sufficient explanation for you to
stop your own harassment, or are you going to try to move
goalposts to somewhere basically irrelevant because
you’re just being dishonest & petty?"
Now... ...isn't saying someone is "dishonest & petty"
pretty much the same as saying he is a "Lying Little
Shit", you Lying Little Shit?
Never saw that one. I'm not the one being dishonest here,
you are by not telling the whole truth, you lying little
shit.
And here I thought the dishonesty was in avoiding answering
this “never saw it” question now that it has been
specifically highlighted and acknowledged…
…how about it?
dishonest. Alan is. So be it.
That’s not answering the question posed.
Insofar as dishonesty, I see the seeking out and posting of
public information which were not posted here by their owner as
constituting harassing actions, particularly when their owner
objected to agreeing to have them republished in a new
location/medium/etc.
And heartening way back to student flight records, please refresh
my recollections, as I don’t feel like looking it up right now: I
thought the point was that those “15 in an hour” was represented
as timestamped accurately, but upon retrospective examination,
didn’t appear particularly plausible to be what was being
claimed.
-hh
to discuss them:
'June 8, 2015, 8:11:20 PM
Just FYI, this is what it takes to get to that first solo, and
safely.'
So the Lying Little Shit put them into CSMA and thus, up for
discussion.
Liar! There is no set minimum number of landings required for solo.Where did I say there was a set minimum, you lying little shit. I just quoted
This was about the fact that you're comparing you offering up
information for anyone who reads CSMA to peruse as equivalent to you deciding to my any and all personal information of mine you care to find here.
<snipping your complete deflection>
As for your documented facts, those were also published by you and upI didn't offer them up here, Lying Little Shit.
for discussion. Example, you gave out your company address as your
home address. That makes you easy to find. Google Earth. Example,
your posts on race results, problems with your old Kent engine, your LinkedIn info, FaceBook's favorite quote, etc.
There is a difference between someone saying "Here: take a look at these things about me" and you scouring the net for my personal information
and offering up here.
Precisely what have I discussed that was not first obtained fromIrrelevant, Lying Little Shit.
you?
<further irrelevancies snipped>
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 79:24:28 |
| Calls: | 6,716 |
| Files: | 12,247 |
| Messages: | 5,357,912 |