• For a good time call 1 (928) 776-9519

    From STALKING_TARGET_42@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 26 06:29:03 2021
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its
    truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit
    Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time
    player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying
    accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly,
    at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From STALKING_TARGET_25@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 26 22:44:33 2021
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, STALKING_TARGET_25 wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its
    truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit
    Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time
    player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly,
    at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com


    And in reply you have nothing but an attempt to start a circus. I have
    not confirmed that the number: 1-423-491-1448 is the right one for Rbowman. Eventually, if you bother to read... you'd see that Rbowman's scheme is
    to 'offhandedly' incite people and then play 'injured party'.

    That is exactly what's occurred. Snit likes to leave out such pesky little details, though. Who else do we know who pulls carbon copy trash? Oh,
    that's right, Rbowman. Our second Rbowman. <giggle>. As for working toward cordiality, it appears that for Snit to do that, he has to give Rbowman
    a do-over for every bigoted judgement he's made about Snit, and overlook
    every single ignorant lie he's posted about Snit as well.

    It was Rbowman who flooded Snit's site millions of times and pretended
    he did not do it.

    Why would you trust me if you understand there is a possibility that
    Rbowman uses sock puppets? That sincerely does not give you gas? This
    is the classic 'standard' by those calling themselves 'Democrats', you
    must 'vindicate' yourself, you are no longer given due process, you are presumed guilty until you prove a negative, which can not be done in this
    time frame.


    --
    Get Rich Slow!! https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22
    Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diesel / Gremlin Cook@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 27 11:48:33 2021
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, Diesel / Gremlin Cook wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its
    truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit
    Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time
    player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly,
    at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com


    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone
    number:

    <XnsAC34A629C8F3DHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32ADC5A8EECHT1@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62CD62DDHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62EE3F39HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62BCD27FHT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62ACDF8HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A62A42D90HT1@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D794DE5AD5HT1@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C66D49387HT1@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212DEE4D1DCHT1@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC21106DF6C20HT1@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    -
    I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! <https://www.spokeo.com/Dustin-Cook/Tennessee/Kingsport/p40064865906>
    Dustin Cook the Fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustin Crook@21:1/5 to Dustin Crook on Mon Sep 27 19:32:18 2021
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 11:48:35 AM UTC-7, Dustin Crook wrote:
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, Diesel / Gremlin Cook wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly, at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    -
    I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! <https://www.spokeo.com/Dustin-Cook/Tennessee/Kingsport/p40064865906>
    Dustin Cook the Fraud


    Snit-like chrisv claimed the evidence were entirely consistent with many
    of the socks. Interesting, why is he having such difficulty backing his assertion up when asked to do so? In other words, if his statement was even mostly correct, and not just a dishonest attempt to come to Glasser Michael Snits rescue? You likely think Ubuntu handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to anything else, really. Perhaps you use it incorrectly. Do you
    not understand the use of https? Sadly this is what arises when acutely
    poor pride takes over Snit-like chrisv's every moment.


    -
    E-commerce Simplified https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/ https://www.realtyhop.com/property-records/search?q=glasser%2C+michael
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustin the dude with the stuck flop@21:1/5 to Dustin the dude with the stuck flop on Mon Sep 27 22:43:12 2021
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, Dustin the dude with the stuck floppy wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its
    truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit
    Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time
    player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly,
    at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com


    Theo expects people to believe that a poster such as Michael Snit Glasser
    who he has many times declared to be a deceiver is someone to 'respect'?
    Why can he assume people are THAT stupid? Google for 'functionally illiterate fraud' and Dustin Cook is found: <https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>.

    It is a simple fact when Theo automatically uses the word 'exonerated'
    the way Clinton does, to the point where the word gains recursive meaning.

    At times, a make believe world is more valuable than facts.

    I've been reading a bit from some of those old threads he was previously
    shown to be bragging about degrees he does not have. I noticed that many
    of those he would go out of his way to frequently attack had broad high-
    tech knowledge. I didn't find many who were also experienced in the programming side of things, or were also trained as an programmer along with various aspects of CS; with the diplomas to back it all up, too.

    --
    Do not click this link! http://www.phmc.state.pa.us/bah/dam/rg/di/r11_089_BirthIndexes/Birth_1909/M.PDF <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin- cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From STALKING_TARGET_03@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 29 02:58:29 2021
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 7:32:20 PM UTC-7, STALKING_TARGET_03 wrote:
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 11:48:35 AM UTC-7, Dustin Crook wrote:
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, Diesel / Gremlin Cook wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself. I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly, at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com
    Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
    at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
    or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
    It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
    these days so that doesn't count as public information,
    snit.
    ...
    As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
    come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
    number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
    believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
    concept.
    -----

    <XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
    -----
    I've only been sharing whats available via a public
    database. You haven't. :)
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
    database. Which makes it private. not public as you
    incorrectly assume.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
    database.

    No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
    previously.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
    he knows that.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
    any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
    from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
    public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
    itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
    via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
    records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
    that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
    you erroneously think here.
    -----

    <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
    -----
    It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
    number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
    The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
    is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
    therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
    via a google search or a paid public records search.
    -----

    <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
    -----
    They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
    number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
    you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
    provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
    *ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
    ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
    It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
    present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
    number assigned to the phone.
    -----

    <XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
    -----
    You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
    correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
    here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
    videos, you were busted.
    -----

    <XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
    -----
    David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
    to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
    think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
    by now? :)
    -----

    <XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
    -----
    His response to that was to file a report with the
    kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
    ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
    from. :)
    -----

    -
    I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! <https://www.spokeo.com/Dustin-Cook/Tennessee/Kingsport/p40064865906> Dustin Cook the Fraud
    Snit-like chrisv claimed the evidence were entirely consistent with many
    of the socks. Interesting, why is he having such difficulty backing his assertion up when asked to do so? In other words, if his statement was even mostly correct, and not just a dishonest attempt to come to Glasser Michael Snits rescue? You likely think Ubuntu handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to anything else, really. Perhaps you use it incorrectly. Do you
    not understand the use of https? Sadly this is what arises when acutely
    poor pride takes over Snit-like chrisv's every moment.


    -
    E-commerce Simplified https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
    https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/ https://www.realtyhop.com/property-records/search?q=glasser%2C+michael
    Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot


    Just Wondering doesn't have any clue what he is blubbering about. Steve Carroll: Narcissistic Bigot.

    Just Wondering failed to show a case study of a successful company that
    has acquired its fortune by not giving a shit about its customers and
    services. How Just Wondering determines when to use the absurd flood
    script to disrupt discussions best http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. The CLAM engine had a false negative hit, and the CLI Clam AntiVirus
    scanner reported what the kernel which is not created by the same person
    or company reported it. My view is beyond your understanding. Obviously,
    since programmers can call Just Wondering out (easily), he's lied; otherwise everyone else must be lying be about him, and I don't think Just Wondering's willing to go for mass alienation of himself and insist that's what happened.



    --
    One Smart Penny!! <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090855/https://www.usphonebook.com/423- 491-1448?Dustin-Cook=&Diesel=&Gremlin=> <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin- cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=> https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-b7075a23
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Smit@21:1/5 to Smit on Wed Sep 29 14:25:32 2021
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 10:43:14 PM UTC-7, Smit wrote:
    On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 6:29:04 AM UTC-7, Dustin the dude with the stuck floppy wrote:
    Given how regularly it seems that Shadow's signature is some distortion
    of an observation Snit Glasser Michael posted which had been a thrashing
    on Shadow for something he did which was asinine/inaccurate/etc... its truly a repeated sign of Shadow's deep rooted embarrassment for having
    been so repeatedly crushed. Just look at your posts and look at Snit Glasser Michael's, there is nothing for me to learn from a small time player like Shadow. But whatever, let him keep making an ass of himself.
    I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. I'm getting false positives in my kill filter. I'm guessing the sock frenzy circus is in
    its brain damage mode again. It is utter bliss to not read that crap.

    How much more time does Shadow's loser arse (a shoe knows more than
    Shadow and is useful) need to prove their Snit Glasser Michael lying accusation with evidence? A shadow of justification, projected perfectly, at the wrong time. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go
    away but it'll never be what your grandfather would use.


    --
    Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com
    Theo expects people to believe that a poster such as Michael Snit Glasser
    who he has many times declared to be a deceiver is someone to 'respect'?
    Why can he assume people are THAT stupid? Google for 'functionally illiterate fraud' and Dustin Cook is found: <https://www.google.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>.

    It is a simple fact when Theo automatically uses the word 'exonerated'
    the way Clinton does, to the point where the word gains recursive meaning.

    At times, a make believe world is more valuable than facts.

    I've been reading a bit from some of those old threads he was previously shown to be bragging about degrees he does not have. I noticed that many
    of those he would go out of his way to frequently attack had broad high-
    tech knowledge. I didn't find many who were also experienced in the programming
    side of things, or were also trained as an programmer along with various aspects of CS; with the diplomas to back it all up, too.

    --
    Do not click this link! http://www.phmc.state.pa.us/bah/dam/rg/di/r11_089_BirthIndexes/Birth_1909/M.PDF
    <http://web.archive.org/web/20200911090505/https://www.usphonebook.com/dustin-
    cook/UQjN2UTM5IzM1ADM0czNwMjMyYzR?Gremlin=&Diesel=>
    Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis


    Snit (a real advocate) has a *lot* of proficiency to demonstrate and
    he has been persuaded to share it. Unfortunately, this is without a doubt
    the least appropriate medium for doing that because a large part of the responses are insulting, word twisting, and other phooey.

    Windows Mobile runs on the AZ Code kernel. So yeah, AZ Code is mobile.
    AZ Code is a super computer. AZ Code is a server. AZ Code is a desktop.
    AZ Code is growing in market share. Your system will crawl while finding
    a way to stop Pothead. And it takes a long time. You likely think Fluxbox handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to anything else, really.

    Pothead would have to be suffering from dementia to be unsure of whether
    or not he "once had" worked with a program with Snit (a real advocate).
    Remind you of anyone? When a guy can't be consistent with his story and
    makes use of make-believe, face saving BS later, it's acutely undeniable
    what his tactic is. Snit (a real advocate) trolled Pothead a bit, big
    fscking deal. Pothead is being a whiny fuckhead about it?

    -
    Best CMS Solution of 2017!
    https://www.prescotthouse.com/professional-staff/
    Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HHI the imaginary friend@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 27 05:08:25 2022
    Commander Kinsey has gone the extra mile, essentially hand holding RonB
    (aka ronb) on coding practices only for RonB (aka ronb) to blindly attack
    him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject. In
    all reality, it's too hard for snit. The clam engine had a false negative
    hit, and the gui Clam AntiVirus scanner reported what the kernel which is
    not created by the same people or company reported it. You purchased it
    and benchmarked it and your "extensive experience" lead you to that verdict, proving what?


    --
    Top Six Ways RonB (aka ronb) Trolls https://www.google.com/maps/place/108+Warrior+Dr,+Kingsport,+TN+37663/ https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
    Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dustin the dude with the stuck flop@21:1/5 to Dustin the dude with the stuck flop on Thu Jan 27 06:59:07 2022
    On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:08:26 AM UTC-7, Dustin the dude with the stuck floppy wrote:
    Commander Kinsey has gone the extra mile, essentially hand holding RonB
    (aka ronb) on coding practices only for RonB (aka ronb) to blindly attack
    him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject. In
    all reality, it's too hard for snit. The clam engine had a false negative hit, and the gui Clam AntiVirus scanner reported what the kernel which is
    not created by the same people or company reported it. You purchased it
    and benchmarked it and your "extensive experience" lead you to that verdict, proving what?


    --
    Top Six Ways RonB (aka ronb) Trolls https://www.google.com/maps/place/108+Warrior+Dr,+Kingsport,+TN+37663/ https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
    Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud


    FromTheRafters is a crazed lunatic who regularly claims anyone who disagrees with Woden to be a sock and, somehow, he needs us to believe that is reasonable.
    Gotta be glue.

    Almost all advocates in this group do scripting either as a hobby or as
    a job, so I think it unlikely Woden consider writing macros to be "voodoo". Where did FromTheRafters find your scripts?

    --
    My Snoring Solution https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)