The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks
existed. Why?
In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about
the resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability
between the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of
the past. Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP I started to wonder why the Apple
iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even these facts about the data &
resource fork which nobody normal would deny.
On 2022-08-29 14:52, Andy Burnelli wrote:
The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks
existed. Why?
In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about
the resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability
between the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of
the past. Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP I started to wonder why the Apple
iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even these facts about the data &
resource fork which nobody normal would deny.
Quote this alleged denial, Arlen...
...and you surely meant "compatibility"...
...and Apple developed the "AppleDouble" format specifically to provide compatibility.
...and since you can't run Mac apps on SunOS/Solaris or Windows, the
only "compatitibility" has to be with standard document files (like
Word, etc.), most of which have no need two forks since they do not
have nor need a Resource Fork anyway.
The fact is that the moron simply doesn't all you had to do is add the
stupid Windoze three letter file suffix and everything works fine.
Your Name wrote:<< Snipped bits out >>
...and since you can't run Mac apps on SunOS/Solaris or Windows, the
only "compatitibility" has to be with standard document files (like
Word, etc.), most of which have no need two forks since they do not
have nor need a Resource Fork anyway.
The fact is that the moron simply doesn't all you had to do is add the
stupid Windoze three letter file suffix and everything works fine.
Below is an _adult_ observation...
The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed.
Why?
In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about the resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability between
the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of the past.
Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP
I started to wonder why the Apple iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even these facts about the data & resource fork which nobody normal would deny.
*iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed*
I wondered... why do these rather strange people always think merely mentioning facts about Apple is bashing Apple... when it dawned on me...
*These iKooks _hate_ Apple designed that resource + data fork system.*
Hence, to an iKook, _any_ fact about Apple, that they hate (which is a
_lot_ of facts indeed), they consider "bashing" Apple.
Strange people indeed they are.
They _hate_ what Apple is.
Merely mentioning even well-known facts about Apple is what they hate most.
Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed.
Why?
In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about the
resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability between
the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of the past.
Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP
I started to wonder why the Apple iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even
these facts about the data & resource fork which nobody normal would deny. >>
*iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed*
I wondered... why do these rather strange people always think merely
mentioning facts about Apple is bashing Apple... when it dawned on me...
*These iKooks _hate_ Apple designed that resource + data fork system.*
Hence, to an iKook, _any_ fact about Apple, that they hate (which is a
_lot_ of facts indeed), they consider "bashing" Apple.
Strange people indeed they are.
They _hate_ what Apple is.
Merely mentioning even well-known facts about Apple is what they hate most. >>
If you ever decide to post some of these messages to the Apple support
forums let us know. I’m wondering if they would be less protective of iOS and iPhones or even more than here.
On 2022-08-31 13:36, badgolferman wrote:
Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed. >>> Why?If you ever decide to post some of these messages to the Apple support
In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about the
resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability between >>> the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of the past.
Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP
I started to wonder why the Apple iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even >>> these facts about the data & resource fork which nobody normal would deny. >>>
*iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed*
I wondered... why do these rather strange people always think merely
mentioning facts about Apple is bashing Apple... when it dawned on me... >>>
*These iKooks _hate_ Apple designed that resource + data fork system.*
Hence, to an iKook, _any_ fact about Apple, that they hate (which is a
_lot_ of facts indeed), they consider "bashing" Apple.
Strange people indeed they are.
They _hate_ what Apple is.
Merely mentioning even well-known facts about Apple is what they hate most. >>
forums let us know. I’m wondering if they would be less protective of iOS >> and iPhones or even more than here.
Why would anyone care that once, more than 20 years ago, Apple's file
system supported two-fork files?
If you ever decide to post some of these messages to the Apple support
forums let us know. Im wondering if they would be less protective of iOS
and iPhones or even more than here.
Since then, I have been to various Apple stores over the years and
_this_ is all they really know how to do.
a. Run whatever test they run
b. Tell you to back it up, wipe out out, and re-install everything
c. If that doesn't work, they tell you "*Buy a new iPad*"
On 2022-09-01 13:38, Andy Burnelli wrote:
Again, this will be an adult conversation
You deserve to be slapped in the face every time you say that.
badgolferman wrote:
I don�t disagree with what you say about their troubleshooting
support, but
they have at least answered my calls and tried to help, sometimes
succeeding. That�s much more than I can say for Google support who never >> responds to any message.
Hi badgolferman,
Again, this will be an adult conversation
I dont disagree with what you say about their troubleshooting support, but they have at least answered my calls and tried to help, sometimes
succeeding. Thats much more than I can say for Google support who never responds to any message.
My question wasnt about your dealings with support on the phone or at the store, it was what kind of reaction would you get if you posted some of the scenarios you present here in their support forums.
In article <ter5ok$29cnf$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-09-01 13:38, Andy Burnelli wrote:
Again, this will be an adult conversation
You deserve to be slapped in the face every time you say that.
what about a kick to the groin?
What forum do you suggest I create an account on to run that test?
What forum do you suggest I create an account on to run that test?
https://discussions.apple.com/community/iphone
badgolferman wrote:
What forum do you suggest I create an account on to run that test?
https://discussions.apple.com/community/iphone
Hi badgolferman,
Thanks for being an adult where you first understood what I was asking (as
I certainly understood what you were advising me about) & then answered it.
Notice you didn't make some fifth-grade childish joke about kicking me in
the balls (which is how the iKooks reacted) because they're afraid of me.
More importantly, they call me a "girl" and they make fun of my "education" because they're afraid that I have a weapon that they can't fight: FACTS
What's kind of sad is they think calling me a "girl" or saying they'll kick me in the balls somehow, in their twisted brains, hurts my feelings.
You, as an adult, can see their reaction to the facts proves my point about them, which is they're so afraid of facts they ridicule the bearer of them.
You can't really blame the iKooks for the way they reacted since they're
like a held-back fifth grader who should be in eight grade who is told by other fifth graders that Santa Claus isn't real... and he says "liar liar pants on fire" because he still believes in the marketing propaganda.
Anyway, for you I'll run an anonymous experiment where I'll ask essentially the exact same question on the Android, iOS & the "apple community" forum.
I've run that test many times by asking the same question on the Android & iOS newsgroups so I know that this newsgroup always acts differently than normal adults - so I already have a baseline to compare the results to.
I'll even add the XDA Developers forum, which I am on daily but which isn't all that active for such types of questions - so it may be nobody responds.
In summary...
I'll open a separate thread with the three links after I finish the test.
1. How the Android Usenet newsgroup responded to the question
2. How the iPhone Usenet newsgroup responded to the question
3. How the Apple community responded to the question
4. How the XDA Developers community responded to the question
Note this will only be a single datapoint; but it will tell us whether it's rampant that the Apple community acts like the iKooks do on this Usenet ng.
Or not.
I expect some will follow you there just so they can feel like they
are protecting the unsuspecting Apple forum users.
LOL... The dip shit trolls are full of themselves. Nobody cares that
they are going to troll Apple Discussions (oh, my!). : D
Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
badgolferman wrote:
What forum do you suggest I create an account on to run that test?
https://discussions.apple.com/community/iphone
Anyway, for you I'll run an anonymous experiment where I'll ask
essentially the exact same question on the Android, iOS & the "apple
community" forum.
I expect some will follow you there just so they can feel like they
are protecting the unsuspecting Apple forum users.
Not bloody likely.
I expect some will follow you there just so they can feel like they are protecting the unsuspecting Apple forum users.
badgolferman wrote:
If you ever decide to post some of these messages to the Apple support
forums let us know. I�m wondering if they would be less protective of iOS >> and iPhones or even more than here.
Hi badgolferman,
This is an _adult_ conversation so I won't treat you like I do the iKooks.
I _have_ contacted Apple a few times and I was shocked, at first, at how sophomoric Apple customer support is. Clearly I was _not_ impressed.
I wrote about my _first_ encounter with the blue shirts years ago, in fact, and I published the audio recording of that first encounter with my iPad.
I'm not joking when I tell you I said then and now that I asked the Apple "experts" why my Wi-Fi wasn't working as well as my Android does when I
have both the Android phone and the (much more expensive) iPad in my hands
as I walk around the house. Android switches SSIDs easily; iOS does not.
My first shock at how incredibly sophomoric Apple customer support is came then, because I showed them the proof with decibel readings off a graph.
Do you want to know what the "expert" asked me?
That Apple "expert" literally asked me: "*What's a decibel?*"
I kid you not (look in the archives for this newsgroup).
This Apple "expert" is supposed to help me "fix" the crappy Wi-Fi on the iPad, and he doesn't even know what a decibel is? Holy cow.
If the Apple "expert" doesn't even know what every high school kid knows, then that's my first indication that Apple "expert" support is sophomoric.
He told me to buy a new iPad...
My second shock was the _only_ thing this "expert" at Apple knew how to do was to backup and re-install everything... after they ran a test (which I don't know what it consisted of) and said they couldn't find a problem.
That's when I concluded that Apple Wi-Fi on my iPad was done poorly, but
the lesson I learned was these "experts" are not experts in anything.
Just like Alan Baker, Snit, Rod Speed, Jolly Roger, Lewis, Your Name, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, Alan Browne, et. al, all know nothing.
It's no longer shocking how uneducated and ignorant these iKooks are.
BTW, that's just my _first_ dealing with the Apple "experts" at the Apple Store. Since then, I have been to various Apple stores over the years and _this_ is all they really know how to do.
a. Run whatever test they run
b. Tell you to back it up, wipe out out, and re-install everything
c. If that doesn't work, they tell you "*Buy a new iPad*"
True story.
(I wrote it up in this ng at the time, and posted the recorded audio.)
My conclusion is that Apple technical support is as bad as Apple coding. Sophomoric is the single most descriptive word I could use for it.
But this thread is about _why_ iKooks hate every fact about Apple.
I think I know why, but you have to understand how an iKook thinks.
a. They believed all the hype
b. So they paid through the nose for that imaginary belief system
c. Hence, anything that shows they were wrong - hurts their ego
Notice their "ego" is wrapped up indelibly so into this buying choice.
1. Any fact that goes against their choice hurts their ego
2. Any person who provides that fact they hate
3. So they hate me.
So be it.
I'm going to try to speak to you as if you are an adult
NARRATOR: He won't.
Im happy to say those settings were already disabled on my phone.
Either its by default or perhaps I had changed it in a previous phone
and it migrated over as a switched phones.
You do you. Just don't try to suggest there's anything inherently
dangerous about the Significant Locations feature without verified
evidence of that claim, then turn around and get upset when someone
calls you out on it. ; )
Why must you do this? Did I actually say anyone should do anything? I
merely provided a news story and shared my own experience. You absolutely must find a way to denigrate people no matter what.
*Apple's iOS Devices Are Vulnerable to Location-Based Snooping*LOL... As is often the case with uneducated unintelligent trolls like
<https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/a-new-security-flaw-affects-15-billion-apple-ios-devices-puts-your-personal-information-at-risk.html>
"A pair of security researchers pointed out the vulnerability
on January 2, 2020, submitting it to Apple"
Arlen, he skims over articles without having an actual understanding of
what they are actually about
*Why You Should Stop This 'Hidden' Location Tracking On Your iPhone*
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/10/04/apple-iphone-12-location-tracking-in-ios-14-upgrade/>
As ESET cyber guru Jake Moore warns, "significant locations is one
of those features ... I cannot think of a positive or useful reason
why Apple would include this feature on any of their devices."
Then Jake has no imagination and/or is clueless about the iPhone.
Hmmm... cyber gurus and security experts are saying the little
functionality that it provides isn't worth the loss in privacy that can be >> expected to occur now, and in the future (since you will never know).
Nonsense. The data is end-to-end encrypted and cannot be accessed by
third parties including Apple. You're fear mongering as usual, and its
lame. You're also a dumb ass troll.
Classic example of the iKook death spiral... protecting the deity.
*iphone tracking settings* <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/GwOYi5dFQdI>
badgolferman wrote:
I�m happy to say those settings were already disabled on my phone.
Either it�s by default or perhaps I had changed it in a previous phone >>>> and it migrated over as a switched phones.
You do you. Just don't try to suggest there's anything inherently
dangerous about the Significant Locations feature without verified
evidence of that claim, then turn around and get upset when someone
calls you out on it. ; )
Why must you do this? Did I actually say anyone should do anything? I
merely provided a news story and shared my own experience. You absolutely
must find a way to denigrate people no matter what.
I've studied these iKooks... they are not anywhere near like normal people. Here's what happened (and which is what always happens on iOS newsgroups).
1. The OP (badgolferman) posted a link to an interesting on-topic datum
2. Everyone read the article and digested what the article taught us
3. Andy Burnelli read the article, learned, and thanked badgolferman
4. Andy Burnelli also added additional value that was not in the article
The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed.
Why?
Why must you do this? Did I actually say anyone should do anything? I
merely provided a news story and shared my own experience. You absolutely
must find a way to denigrate people no matter what.
On the contrary, by making the false claim that correcting blatant disinformation is supposedly "denigrating" anyone, you are siding
with those spreading the disinformation and denigrating yourself.
added a setting that one should consider turning off
You and your best buddy Arlen aren't fooling any of the adults here.
Jolly Roger wrote:
Why must you do this? Did I actually say anyone should do anything? I
merely provided a news story and shared my own experience. You absolutely >>> must find a way to denigrate people no matter what.
On the contrary, by making the false claim that correcting blatant
disinformation is supposedly "denigrating" anyone, you are siding
with those spreading the disinformation and denigrating yourself.
I've studied Jolly Roger for years,
but they
might be more likely to stop trolling if they used their own name.
it hasn't stopped you, and that's yet another one of your ad hominem
attacks.
Even nospam probably understands the benefit of being able to plan a
trip using a computer then sending it the phone.
another ad hominem.
RocketSurgeon wrote:
Not bloody likely.
The adult observation is not so much that the iKooks are driven by
propaganda but by their inability to distinguish fact from fiction coupled with their ego being _directly_ tied to the size of Apple's profit margins.
nospam wrote:
Yet, unlike the rest of the iKooks, there actually is sometimes productive merit in your conversations, as there is with Steve's technical content.
Both of you, in different ways, add technical value to these discussions.
However, for you to accuse sms of "ad hominem attacks" reeks of duplicity. Almost every accusation you make of others, is a projection of yourself.
If you stuck with technical content, you wouldn't be an iKook after all.
It's not your fault.
Due to your enslavement to the Apple deity, you desperately feel the need
to accuse everyone not enslaved of all the duplicity you own on your own.
aka... *Projection*
On 2022-11-06 17:50, Andy Burnelli wrote:
Classic example of the iKook death spiral... protecting the deity.
*iphone tracking settings*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/GwOYi5dFQdI>
badgolferman wrote:
I�m happy to say those settings were already disabled on my phone. >>>>> Either it�s by default or perhaps I had changed it in a previous phone >>>>> and it migrated over as a switched phones.
You do you. Just don't try to suggest there's anything inherently
dangerous about the Significant Locations feature without verified
evidence of that claim, then turn around and get upset when someone
calls you out on it. ; )
Why must you do this? Did I actually say anyone should do anything? I
merely provided a news story and shared my own experience. You
absolutely
must find a way to denigrate people no matter what.
I've studied these iKooks... they are not anywhere near like normal
people.
Here's what happened (and which is what always happens on iOS
newsgroups).
1. The OP (badgolferman) posted a link to an interesting on-topic datum
2. Everyone read the article and digested what the article taught us
3. Andy Burnelli read the article, learned, and thanked badgolferman
4. Andy Burnelli also added additional value that was not in the article
Hint:
Ordinary, normal adults don't refer to themselves in the third person.
Also your fear of Arlen has made you look incredibly ignorant. Every time
you accuse me of being Arlen you only make yourself look more stupid.
Maybe that makes you a better person to admit you're wrong, but you're
still obsessed with Apple.
I hope Apple, warts and all, is the Godzilla that crushes Muskrat. Or
Europe. Somebody?
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Maybe that makes you a better person to admit you're wrong, but you're
still obsessed with Apple.
Hi Hemidactylus,
Since your response was an adult response, I'll treat you as an adult
but at the risk of overloading you with information you can't process.
Thanks for your assessment of the situation which I think you don't quite understand that I'm nothing whatsoever like you iKooks are so all your projection of your own feelings and motives onto me will be dead wrong.
To me, an iPhone or an Android phone is just a commodity.
It's a thing. A tool. A means to an end.
It doesn't do anything for me but the job it's designed to do.
Which is a job of a commodity
1. Make/receive phone calls & text/mms messages
2. Take/send photos/videos & edit files as needed
3. Run programs as needed such as map routing & mock gps locations
etc.
A phone (whether Apple or Samsung) is just a commodity in my pocket that
does basic stuff (and sometimes neatly sophisticated stuff too!).
It's not a status symbol. It's not a measure of my style. It's not an expression of my personality. It's nothing. It's just a phone.
The phone in my pocket says _nothing_ about me.
It's not supposed to.
That's not its job.
But to you... things are different... aren't they?
An iPhone is much (much) more to you than just a commodity phone, right?
You're really _proud_ of your iPhone, are you not?
You're rather proud of the high price too, are you not?
You're even proud of Apple's (ungodly) _profit_ margins, are you not?
All those makes you feel like _you_ made the right choice, do they not?
I'm _not_ like you.
A phone to me is not what a phone is to you.
Apple or Samsung to me is not what Apple or Samsung are to you.
If you know Roman history, Apple is the blues to you and Google the reds.
To me, they're just different shades of the same thing.
You never see me defend Google unless Google does something good.
Just as you never see me defend Apple unless Apple does something good.
To me, Apple or Google are the same thing.
They make a commodity.
For you to claim I am "obsessed" with Apple is merely for you to complement me on being obsessed with the truth about Apple, just as I'm obsessed about the truth on Google.
I'm not invested in either one financially, and more to the concept here,
my _ego_ isn't invested in either company's commodity product lines.
You _think_ I think the way you think - but you're wrong.
I'm normal. You're not.
You don't get it that you and I aren't in the same playing field.
You are driven completely differently than I'm driven, on this newsgroup.
My goals on this newsgroup are the same as on the adult OS newsgroups
a. Learn from others
b. Help others (particularly write tutorials and solutions)
And, what's _different_ is another goal on the child-like Apple newsgroups. c. Show the iKooks for what they are
I don't know if you realize how despicable all you iKooks are.
You probably don't realize how shockingly unprepossessing you iKooks are.
A. Your whole life people have been telling you that you're stupid
B. You failed in every attempt at educating yourself as a result of that
And, what's _different_ is another trait all you iKooks commonly share.
C. Your entire ego is unnaturally invested in _your_ perception of Apple.
That third trait is not normal.
Nobody sane gloats how much profit Apple makes off of them.
But iKooks do.
Nobody normal defends any company to the death unless they are deeply invested in that company, where you iKooks invest your ego into Apple.
Hence you iKooks find me a threat.
And I'm actually here to _be_ that threat.
You see, you hate me, because you perceive that I hate Apple.
But I don't care about Apple any more than I care about Google or Samsung.
My goal on this newsgroup, besides to learn from and help others, is to
show the world, in the public permanent record, what a horribly despicable set of individuals _all_ you iKooks truly are.
You consider me a threat because I prove with facts that your entire belief system is based on mere marketing words - and not on facts that normal
people process - but I'm aware that it's not me you're most afraid of.
It's those facts.
Which, to the point of this thread, is why my credibility is what matters.
I hope Apple, warts and all, is the Godzilla that crushes Muskrat. Or
Europe. Somebody?
As alluded to above, all iKooks have been told your whole lives that you're worthless, which I understand - and that's why all of you iKooks react with such stunted fifth-grade hatred for anyone and anything successful.
In a way, I feel sorry for you despite you being such offensive people in that (a) it's not your fault you have low IQs, and (b) no education, and as
a result of your understandable low self esteem, you fall for every
marketing trick in the book that makes you feel better about yourself.
Apple makes you feel real nice about yourself don't they?
Apple loves you.
Apple tells you that you're making all the right choices, don't they?
And Apple simply takes a bit here, and a bit there, and a bit over there.
Apple loves you more than anyone ever did - and that's why you're iKooks. Because Apple fills that self esteem hole that nothing has ever filled.
It's why you all react with vicious hatred to all facts showing that you
were fooled into believing in an imaginary belief system that isn't real.
iKook: Santa is great! He's gonna give me a new iPhone for Christmas!
Adult: No son. That's just a marketing gimmick. Your parents are Santa.
iKook: No. You're wrong. He exists. I saw him on an Apple advertisement.
Adult: That's how marketing works, son. Apple wants you to think that.
Adult: The facts are Santa can't do that magical stuff you believe in.
iKook: Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! I hate you. I hate you! You're wrong!
…
To me, an iPhone or an Android phone is just a commodity.
It's a thing. A tool. A means to an end.
It doesn't do anything for me but the job it's designed to do.
Which is a job of a commodity
1. Make/receive phone calls & text/mms messages
2. Take/send photos/videos & edit files as needed
3. Run programs as needed such as map routing & mock gps locations
etc.
A phone (whether Apple or Samsung) is just a commodity in my pocket that does basic stuff (and sometimes neatly sophisticated stuff too!).
It's not a status symbol. It's not a measure of my style. It's not an expression of my personality. It's nothing. It's just a phone.
The phone in my pocket says _nothing_ about me.
It's not supposed to.
That's not its job.
But to you... things are different... aren't they?
An iPhone is much (much) more to you than just a commodity phone, right?
You're really _proud_ of your iPhone, are you not?
You're rather proud of the high price too, are you not?
You're even proud of Apple's (ungodly) _profit_ margins, are you not?
All those makes you feel like _you_ made the right choice, do they not?
To me, Apple or Google are the same thing.
They make a commodity.
That third trait is not normal.
Nobody sane gloats how much profit Apple makes off of them.
But iKooks do.
Nobody normal defends any company to the death unless they are deeply invested in that company, where you iKooks invest your ego into Apple.
I just proved, beyond any doubt...
On 2022-11-06 17:50, Andy Burnelli wrote:
Hint:
Ordinary, normal adults don't refer to themselves in the third person.
Jolly Roger wrote:
Neither of us said that
Your claim, and that of nospam, has _always_ been that it's "normal"
for only certain iPhones (but not others, and not iPads, or macOS
laptops), to have batteries that suddenly and secretly "just die"
Never said that either,
Jolly Roger wrote:
Never said that either,
C'mon Jolly Roger.
Jolly Roger wrote:
Never said that either,
C'mon Jolly Roger.
But mostly he lacks memory as nospam can't keep his excuses straight.
There were death threats, which were reported to the FBI made by "Rod
Speed" (& by nospam)
i did not make a death threat to you or anyone else.
The FBI said they'd investigate and I said I'd be changing the nym.
bullshit.
My credibility is my most important personal assess so read this please:
then you're flat broke.
I take all death threats seriously, nospam.
Even from you.
As a current EE I prefer wireless to wires.
go back to school.
I checked Steve's resume and he _does_ have an EE degree, as do I (among others), where you are too uneducated to know how hard EE degrees are.
They're _extremely_ difficult to earn, as the math and physics involved is deeply complex -
which means Steve has the ability to comprehend details.
In article <tqju6u$1p2r$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
<spam@nospam.com> wrote:
I checked Steve's resume and he _does_ have an EE degree, as do I (among
others), where you are too uneducated to know how hard EE degrees are.
i see you're digging yourself another hole.
They're _extremely_ difficult to earn, as the math and physics involved is >> deeply complex -
maybe for you it's '_extremely- difficult' and 'deeply complex'.
which means Steve has the ability to comprehend details.
what he has is the ability to blatantly lie about details while
sounding like he knows what he's talking about.
if you actually had an
ee degree (and weren't also a liar), you'd realize just how full of
shit he is.
nospam wrote:
In article <tqju6u$1p2r$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
<spam@nospam.com> wrote:
I checked Steve's resume and he _does_ have an EE degree, as do I (among >>> others), where you are too uneducated to know how hard EE degrees are.
i see you're digging yourself another hole.
Look nospam, I'm not ashamed (like you are) to admit what degrees I have,
I'm not ashamed (like you are) to admit what degrees I have,
What degree you CLAIM to have, you mean.
Who _lies_ that brazenly?
Who _lies_ that repeatedly?
Who has _never_ admitted his lies, even after we proved them beyond doubt?
Who _lies_ that brazenly?
Who _lies_ that repeatedly?
Who has _never_ admitted his lies, even after we proved them beyond doubt?
what reflective surfaces do you have in close proximity?
I'm not ashamed (like you are) to admit what degrees I have,
What degree you CLAIM to have, you mean.
by using photos of long outdated books.
nospam wrote:
I'm not ashamed (like you are) to admit what degrees I have,
What degree you CLAIM to have, you mean.
by using photos of long outdated books.
It's interesting that you iKooks are so ignorant, that you don't realize
any textbook I've used on my degrees, _must_ be older books to be credible.
no it's not. it's what's on samsung's site right now, dated february
2023, and includes 'upcoming devices' in the classifications.
oops. feb 2022.
where Samsung unilaterally _extended_ support to most older models.
they did not.
What you are always ignorant of, nospam, is you can't comprehend that on
Android there is no need to log into the Google mothership just to send and >> receive text messages, while that need is _required_ on your iPhone.
false.
ftfy, and android too, for that matter.
My question to this lying piece of shit is why I cant get an answer on battery 'maximum capacity' on my ipad but can on my iphone.
You actually played into his lying fucking bullshit. Jolly Roger should
come by and gaslight everyone as to why that is unimportant. Seriously
dont fucking bullshit me more assclown liars about how this is unimportant because you are fucking lamers. Pay almost a thousand dollars for a high
end iPad and have fucking liars lie. Lying assclowns.
Implicitly admitted is that ipads are not self-sufficient. You need a
Windows PC to check battery health. Low end bullshit.
This thread is designed to provide evidence, for future researchers and for the permanent record, how _different_ from normal people the iKooks are.
Am 02.03.23 um 07:04 schrieb Andy Burnelli:
This thread is designed to provide evidence, for future researchers and for >> the permanent record, how _different_ from normal people the iKooks are.
To all current and future researchers: Andy Burnelli needs urgently
robust psychological support. Immediately but that is self-explaining.
Everyone who replies to it is giving it "robust psychological support".
On 02/03/2023 08:30, Alan Browne wrote:
Everyone who replies to it is giving it "robust psychological support".
That you use it means he's right about you being always childish.
If I had to switch to an Android phone (which is not an impossibility),
it would still be wrong about most everything it spouts.
As to keeping my iPhone, the troll is not part of my decision.
I'm interested in driving cars fast, and I own a BMW. I'm not sure what
a "bimmer" or "beemer" means (or why you would use both terms).
Both mean BMW. Using both terms is a red piece of cloth waving in the molecules of nitrogen, oxygen and other trace gases flowing by.
Apparently these people overflow with juvenile hatred and feel compelled >>> to lash out at random strangers over utterly trivial things.
It's pretty sad behavior. (Jolly Roger
Yet another irony meter just exploded! (badgolferman)
Indeed. For one of this newsgroups most profligate trolls, to post that,
is indeed amusing. (sms)
I think nospam could help if he wanted to, but alas it's often hard to >>>> get a straight answer from him.
my answers are always straight, unless i'm toying with a troll.
Is that what you think of me?
it should be obvious to whom i'm referring, and it's not you.
It's revealing that Jolly Roger can't see the humor in what Apple did.
What's much more revealing is how your little troll gang is so bent out
of shape about Apple announcing a new color for iPhones that you are literally spending hours of your collective time complaining about it
and insulting complete strangers who dare to choose to purchase one. You people are pathetic, angry, little snots. : )
It seems the reason Jolly Roger is so upset
Projection. I'm not going around bitching and moaning about something innocuous and belittling anyone who points out how shitty you're being.
Jolly Roger wrote:
It's revealing that Jolly Roger can't see the humor in what Apple
did.
What's much more revealing is how your little troll gang is so bent
out of shape about Apple announcing a new color for iPhones that you
are literally spending hours of your collective time complaining
about it and insulting complete strangers who dare to choose to
purchase one. You people are pathetic, angry, little snots. : )
This *YELLOW!!!!* is actually very important
What matters to me is _why_ I am so ashamed & fearful of what Apple
did.
It seems the reason Jolly Roger is so upset
Projection. I'm not going around bitching and moaning about something
innocuous and belittling anyone who points out how shitty you're
being.
I'm "upset" that Apple did something
*YELLOW!!!!* is something that people actually want.
That's interesting, is it not?
On 2023-03-13, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
It's revealing that Jolly Roger can't see the humor in what Apple
did.
What's much more revealing is how your little troll gang is so bent
out of shape about Apple announcing a new color for iPhones that you
are literally spending hours of your collective time complaining
about it and insulting complete strangers who dare to choose to
purchase one. You people are pathetic, angry, little snots. : )
This *YELLOW!!!!* is actually very important
It really isn't.
What matters to me is _why_ I am so ashamed & fearful of what Apple
did.
Mostly insecurity. Books could be written about your psychological
issues - yes, BOOKS (plural)!
It seems the reason Jolly Roger is so upset
Projection. I'm not going around bitching and moaning about something
innocuous and belittling anyone who points out how shitty you're
being.
I'm "upset" that Apple did something
Clearly. It's unfortunate, but only you are in control over your
feefees.
*YELLOW!!!!* is something that people actually want.
Some do, some don't - like any other color. The fact that you are this
upset about it says way more about you than anyone else.
That's interesting, is it not?
No. It's actually downright boring that you spend your days and nights trolling about *the* most inane bullshit.
There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
Im not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 69:24:50 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Files: | 12,244 |
Messages: | 5,356,702 |