Several of my favorite games and even the app I'm using now (NewsTapLite) haven't been updated in quite some time.
These are considered
abandoned apps that have not been updated for more than two years.
For Android, there are other ways to obtain apps, with many other
legitimate app stores as well as many app stores that you have to be
very careful using, see <https://buildfire.com/mobile-app-stores-list/>.
For Android, there are other ways to obtain apps,
as there is with ios.
For Android, there are other ways to obtain apps,
as there is with ios.
And what are they?
Five ways that I know of.
None of these are the same as just side-loading an apk onto an Android device, either from the app developer or from an app store other than
the Google Play store.
https://www.phonearena.com/news/one-third-of-all-apps-not-updated-in-over-2-years_id140169I've been wondering how this will affect NewsTap.
badgolferman wrote:
These are considered
abandoned apps that have not been updated for more than two years.
Hi badgolferman,
From one actual adult to another...
In the case of Apple, that statement above was proven to be bullshit.
The iKooks don't have the mental capacity to understand why.
But normal adults should have the ability to comprehend the details.
The fact is Apple's removal had (almost) _nothing_ whatsoever to do with "abandoned apps", per se.
Apple never tells the truth - but in this case - they were force to admit
it in a followup to what Apple _tried_ to lie about was their rationale.
sms wrote:
For Android, there are other ways to obtain apps, with many other
legitimate app stores as well as many app stores that you have to be
very careful using, see <https://buildfire.com/mobile-app-stores-list/>.
Steve is correct that Apple got caught in their lies that the iKooks like nospam don't have the mental acuity that Steve has, to figure that out.
1. Apple boldly lied about _why_ they're removing apps in 30 days.
pehache wrote:
But there are *many* other examples where Apple showed little concern
for compatibility, just thinking "customer are meant to give their
money, they will do so".
This has _nothing_ to do with compatibility.
Apple already corrected their initial claims.
It's just getting rid of old apps that weren't downloaded often.
Unless that too was a lie from Apple, we have to believe them.
--
*Apple clarifies conditions for App Store app removal* <https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/04/30/apple-clarifies-conditions-for-app-store-app-removal-extends-update-deadline-to-90-days>
Is Apple really that stupid that they don't know their own policies?
*Apple Clarifies Criteria For App Store Improvement Process* <https://www.republicworld.com/technology-news/other-tech-news/apple-clarifies-criteria-for-app-store-improvement-process-check-details-here-articleshow.html>
Or, did Apple simply get caught in yet another brazen lie to the world? *Apple clarifies which apps are to be removed from the App Store* <https://digitnews.in/apple-clarifies-which-apps-are-to-be-removed-from-the-app-store/>
Did Apple really think they'd get away with such brazen public lies? *Clarifying criteria for App Store app removal process* <https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=gi6npkmf>
Apple lied.
This is _not_ about old apps. It never was.
I haven't seen a single low-IQ uneducated iKook _understand_ that fact yet.
But there are *many* other examples where Apple showed little concern
for compatibility, just thinking "customer are meant to give their
money, they will do so".
On 2022-05-17 1:52 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
...
Look at this:
--
You've carefully placed your non-cites beneath the sig separator.
You've carefully placed your non-cites beneath the sig separator.
that's because unlike normal people
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 73:09:25 |
| Calls: | 6,714 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,246 |
| Messages: | 5,357,168 |