On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
if he did go away someone would take his placePlease stop pushing your insane drama.
You seem to like the word "drama".
No. I just wish Carroll would stop. No benefit in you helping him, either. >>>>
If you would ignore and stop feeding him he would go away.
Tried for five years and it did not work.
Not as extreme.
He clearly has you pegged.
On 5/2/2022 8:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
if he did go away someone would take his placePlease stop pushing your insane drama.
You seem to like the word "drama".
No. I just wish Carroll would stop. No benefit in you helping him, either.
If you would ignore and stop feeding him he would go away.
Tried for five years and it did not work.
Not as extreme.
He clearly has you pegged.
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
On 2022-05-02, Jay Santos <js@cap.con> wrote:
On 5/2/2022 8:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
if he did go away someone would take his placePlease stop pushing your insane drama.
You seem to like the word "drama".
No. I just wish Carroll would stop. No benefit in you helping him, either.
If you would ignore and stop feeding him he would go away.
Tried for five years and it did not work.
Not as extreme.
He clearly has you pegged.
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content,
which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
On 2022-05-02, Jay Santos <js@cap.con> wrote:
On 5/2/2022 8:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
if he did go away someone would take his placePlease stop pushing your insane drama.
You seem to like the word "drama".
No. I just wish Carroll would stop. No benefit in you helping him, either.
If you would ignore and stop feeding him he would go away.
Tried for five years and it did not work.
Not as extreme.
He clearly has you pegged.
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content,
which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
On May 2, 2022 at 11:31:39 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4p82a$gir$10@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing >>>> unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content,
which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context, and with no understanding of what is even >>> being said. How bizarre of you.
Your need for drama is never ending.
Oh, so there are 'contexts' for a statement like that, eh?
Feel free to 'explain' it <eyeroll>.
What makes you think your comprehension has improved since the last time we discussed your obsession with this quote you do not even understand?
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing
unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content,
which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context, and with no understanding of what is even
being said. How bizarre of you.
Your need for drama is never ending.
Oh, so there are 'contexts' for a statement like that, eh?
Feel free to 'explain' it <eyeroll>.
On May 2, 2022 at 8:51:16 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4oulk$ub0$14@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-05-02, Jay Santos <js@cap.con> wrote:
On 5/2/2022 8:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
if he did go away someone would take his placePlease stop pushing your insane drama.
You seem to like the word "drama".
No. I just wish Carroll would stop. No benefit in you helping him, either.
If you would ignore and stop feeding him he would go away.
Tried for five years and it did not work.
Not as extreme.
He clearly has you pegged.
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing
unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content,
which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context,
On May 2, 2022 at 12:07:06 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4pa4q$gir$17@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2022 at 11:31:39 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4p82a$gir$10@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing >>>>>> unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually* >>>>>> talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content, >>>>>> which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context, and with no understanding of what is even >>>>> being said. How bizarre of you.
Your need for drama is never ending.
Oh, so there are 'contexts' for a statement like that, eh?
Feel free to 'explain' it <eyeroll>.
What makes you think your comprehension has improved since the last time we >>> discussed your obsession with this quote you do not even understand?
So you can't. I'm not surprised.
I cannot make you understand simple concepts. OK.
What makes you think I'll be the only one reading this (who sees what you
attempted to do here)?
Do you think anyone else is reading
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2022 at 11:31:39 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4p82a$gir$10@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing >>>>> unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually*
talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content, >>>>> which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context, and with no understanding of what is even >>>> being said. How bizarre of you.
Your need for drama is never ending.
Oh, so there are 'contexts' for a statement like that, eh?
Feel free to 'explain' it <eyeroll>.
What makes you think your comprehension has improved since the last time we >> discussed your obsession with this quote you do not even understand?
So you can't. I'm not surprised.
What makes you think I'll be the only one reading this (who sees what you attempted to do here)?
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2022 at 12:07:06 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4pa4q$gir$17@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-05-02, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2022 at 11:31:39 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t4p82a$gir$10@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
Snot Michael Glasser is easily triggered.
He's constantly babbling about how 'tech' savvy he is, which is nothing >>>>>>> unusual for him, but as you can see, he's not too big on *actually* >>>>>>> talking about 'tech'. Clearly, he prefers personalities over content, >>>>>>> which doesn't square with his lie:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
You quote that, out of context, and with no understanding of what is even
being said. How bizarre of you.
Your need for drama is never ending.
Oh, so there are 'contexts' for a statement like that, eh?
Feel free to 'explain' it <eyeroll>.
What makes you think your comprehension has improved since the last time we
discussed your obsession with this quote you do not even understand?
So you can't. I'm not surprised.
I cannot make you understand simple concepts. OK.
You've claimed you always provide proof of your assertions, where's the
proof of this mystery context you've suggested exists?
What makes you think I'll be the only one reading this (who sees what you >>> attempted to do here)?
Do you think anyone else is reading your obsessive drama crap? Anyone at all?
I doubt it.
But if they do, they can see you pulled up an ancient quote and clearly do not
understand it.
I know people read it when I shove reality in your face. That I do is a
large part of why they see your game... but you make it all happen.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 70:27:43 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,840 |