Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- show?
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:05:47 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote <t39k9b$dt9$8@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Do either of you ever 'talk tech'
without dragging 'personalities' into it? Let's give it a
try...
And this is you trying to manipulate others to talk about some >>>>>>>>> specific area of tech that is not related to the current
topic.
OK, so Glasser clearly failed. DB? You're up!
https://ibb.co/vwjGfKD
Better than Glasser's 'effort'.
Ah, I said that it would turn out you were playing such games.
But here is the thing: your solution works LESS well than mine for
the goals of mine.
Mine shows a notification and copies the RBG to the clipboard.
Yours fails to meet the basic requirements.
And now your games will go into full swing, saying actually doing
the task was not the goal of your code.
Actually, it was *I* who 'said' to test something I "noted"... and
you *did* it, as if on cue. "Hmmm..." did I "manipulate" you here?
The idea I tested something for you is delusional on your part.
Yet, that's exactly what just happened here:
Nope. Never copied or pasted. It was easy to see what your code did...
and how it failed to meet up to the goals of the app I created.
But you MUST push your drama.
Me (still at the top of this post):
"Do either of you ever 'talk tech' without dragging 'personalities'
into it? Let's give it a try..."
And in response to that you 'did what you do'. The only thing that's
delusional here is to pretend reality doesn't show what it shows. But
that's you <shrug>.
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- show?
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wrote <XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic
shit- show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex
we should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies,
and other such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks
behind to focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much
attention as Jay did for his trolling.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:7EY5K.352562$Gojc.32708@fx99.iad:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wrote
<XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic
shit- show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex
we should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies,
and other such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks
behind to focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much
attention as Jay did for his trolling.
Sorry snit but I'm not going to encourage your trolling by your joining
your circus.
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wrote <XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit-
show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:TwY5K.187427$yi_7.148496@fx39.iad:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:05:47 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t39k9b$dt9$8@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Do either of you ever 'talk tech'
without dragging 'personalities' into it? Let's give it a >>>>>>>>>>> try...
And this is you trying to manipulate others to talk about some >>>>>>>>>> specific area of tech that is not related to the current
topic.
OK, so Glasser clearly failed. DB? You're up!
https://ibb.co/vwjGfKD
Better than Glasser's 'effort'.
Ah, I said that it would turn out you were playing such games.
But here is the thing: your solution works LESS well than mine for >>>>>> the goals of mine.
Mine shows a notification and copies the RBG to the clipboard.
Yours fails to meet the basic requirements.
And now your games will go into full swing, saying actually doing
the task was not the goal of your code.
Actually, it was *I* who 'said' to test something I "noted"... and
you *did* it, as if on cue. "Hmmm..." did I "manipulate" you here?
The idea I tested something for you is delusional on your part.
Yet, that's exactly what just happened here:
Nope. Never copied or pasted. It was easy to see what your code did...
and how it failed to meet up to the goals of the app I created.
But you MUST push your drama.
Me (still at the top of this post):
"Do either of you ever 'talk tech' without dragging 'personalities'
into it? Let's give it a try..."
And in response to that you 'did what you do'. The only thing that's
delusional here is to pretend reality doesn't show what it shows. But
that's you <shrug>.
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- show?
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wrote <XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit-
show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex we should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies, and other such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks behind to focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much attention as Jay did for his trolling.
On 4/14/2022 1:14 PM, Snit wrote:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wroteI enjoy your posts. Keep up the interesting work.
<XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- >>> show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex we
should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies, and other >> such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks behind to >> focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much attention as Jay did for >> his trolling.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:7EY5K.352562$Gojc.32708@fx99.iad:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wrote
<XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic
shit- show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex
we should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies,
and other such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks
behind to focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much
attention as Jay did for his trolling.
Sorry snit but I'm not going to encourage your trolling by your joining
your circus.
On 4/14/2022 1:14 PM, Snit wrote:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:13:13 AM MST, "lh" wroteI enjoy your posts. Keep up the interesting work.
<XnsAE79867CBE90742342341114411@144.76.35.252>:
...
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- >>> show?
I respond to those of you who troll.
But let's get back to the topic. I say that in terms of gender and sex we
should look to biologists, scientists, scientific sites, studies, and other >> such evidence. I also say we should respect equal rights.
Curious of your views... assuming you can leave personal attacks behind to >> focus on such. If not, do not expect to get as much attention as Jay did for >> his trolling.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:TwY5K.187427$yi_7.148496@fx39.iad:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:05:47 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t39k9b$dt9$8@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Do either of you ever 'talk tech'
without dragging 'personalities' into it? Let's give it a >>>>>>>>>>> try...
And this is you trying to manipulate others to talk about some >>>>>>>>>> specific area of tech that is not related to the current
topic.
OK, so Glasser clearly failed. DB? You're up!
https://ibb.co/vwjGfKD
Better than Glasser's 'effort'.
Ah, I said that it would turn out you were playing such games.
But here is the thing: your solution works LESS well than mine for >>>>>> the goals of mine.
Mine shows a notification and copies the RBG to the clipboard.
Yours fails to meet the basic requirements.
And now your games will go into full swing, saying actually doing
the task was not the goal of your code.
Actually, it was *I* who 'said' to test something I "noted"... and
you *did* it, as if on cue. "Hmmm..." did I "manipulate" you here?
The idea I tested something for you is delusional on your part.
Yet, that's exactly what just happened here:
Nope. Never copied or pasted. It was easy to see what your code did...
and how it failed to meet up to the goals of the app I created.
But you MUST push your drama.
Me (still at the top of this post):
"Do either of you ever 'talk tech' without dragging 'personalities'
into it? Let's give it a try..."
And in response to that you 'did what you do'. The only thing that's
delusional here is to pretend reality doesn't show what it shows. But
that's you <shrug>.
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit- show?
On 4/14/2022 1:13 PM, lh wrote:
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote inThe way I see it, snit makes very good points, backs them up with
news:TwY5K.187427$yi_7.148496@fx39.iad:
On Apr 14, 2022 at 10:05:47 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t39k9b$dt9$8@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Do either of you ever 'talk tech'
without dragging 'personalities' into it? Let's give it a >>>>>>>>>>>> try...
And this is you trying to manipulate others to talk about some >>>>>>>>>>> specific area of tech that is not related to the current >>>>>>>>>>> topic.
OK, so Glasser clearly failed. DB? You're up!
https://ibb.co/vwjGfKD
Better than Glasser's 'effort'.
Ah, I said that it would turn out you were playing such games.
But here is the thing: your solution works LESS well than mine for >>>>>>> the goals of mine.
Mine shows a notification and copies the RBG to the clipboard.
Yours fails to meet the basic requirements.
And now your games will go into full swing, saying actually doing >>>>>>> the task was not the goal of your code.
Actually, it was *I* who 'said' to test something I "noted"... and >>>>>> you *did* it, as if on cue. "Hmmm..." did I "manipulate" you here?
The idea I tested something for you is delusional on your part.
Yet, that's exactly what just happened here:
Nope. Never copied or pasted. It was easy to see what your code did...
and how it failed to meet up to the goals of the app I created.
But you MUST push your drama.
Me (still at the top of this post):
"Do either of you ever 'talk tech' without dragging 'personalities'
into it? Let's give it a try..."
And in response to that you 'did what you do'. The only thing that's
delusional here is to pretend reality doesn't show what it shows. But
that's you <shrug>.
Hey snit, why does every thread you post in turn into one gigantic shit-
show?
evidence and that is what gets people upset.
Those who disagree with snit should try presenting some evidence to
back their points rather than going emotional and relying on feelings.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 65:02:17 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,203 |