When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars" are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars" are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars" are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 10:56:44 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!! https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 10:56:44 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted
ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective
of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--I bet Mike Easter thinks his wife's life was perfect. Another bottle
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
you mean, Mike Easter drinks them down damn quick.
Um, in Mike Easter's 'view', that a file has been published is "confirmation" that Apd designed it now?
Mike Easter can only think from the perspective of a sociopath.
This is something you know nothing about.
--
E-commerce Simplified https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud https://winthropmemorials.org/veterans/eightnames/files/Eight-Names- Winthrops-VietnamVeterans-Pinzur.pdf <https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud
On Friday, September 10, 2021 at 9:48:33 AM UTC-7, Stefen Carroll - fretwizzer wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 10:56:44 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--It is a piece of cake to handpick by bragging about a small number of exceptions clashing from what's typical. What is more important from an advocacy perspective are the expected usages. How many more chances does Flooder Steve Carroll's extremely dim witted ass (a dumb terminal knows
Best CMS Solution of 2017!! https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
more than Flooder Steve Carroll and is useful) need to prove their Snit
sock accusation with support? Flooder Steve Carroll is far too unintelligent to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do
is flooding groups.
The Clam engine had a false positive hit, and the GUI ClamXav reported
what the signal processor which isn't created by the same people or company reported it. I think the point is not really to get innocent posters to listen to him. The point is likely to piss Snit off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent.
--
Get Rich Slow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
On Friday, September 10, 2021 at 9:48:33 AM UTC-7, Stefen Carroll - fretwizzer wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 10:56:44 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
When I got here, I wanted to be reasonable and nonjudgemental. I gave Snit
sock Snit Michael Glasser more than a credible person generally would.
How many more chances does Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser's dim witted ass (a shoe knows more than Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser and is useful) need to prove their Diesel spamming accusation with support?
Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser can only understand from the perspective of a programmer. It was Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser who forged me (and others) and admitted to having done so.
Don't get too egotistical, Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser, sometimes "cigars"
are just that. I quoted examples of Snit sock Snit Michael Glasser blaming
me for the actions of others, focusing on ego and not tech, etc. His response:
to repeat the same nonsense.
--Dustin Cook AKA Diesel AKA Gremlin lying about his 1-423-491-1448 phone number:
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
--It is a piece of cake to handpick by bragging about a small number of exceptions clashing from what's typical. What is more important from an advocacy perspective are the expected usages. How many more chances does Flooder Steve Carroll's extremely dim witted ass (a dumb terminal knows
Best CMS Solution of 2017!! https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot
more than Flooder Steve Carroll and is useful) need to prove their Snit
sock accusation with support? Flooder Steve Carroll is far too unintelligent to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do
is flooding groups.
The Clam engine had a false positive hit, and the GUI ClamXav reported
what the signal processor which isn't created by the same people or company reported it. I think the point is not really to get innocent posters to listen to him. The point is likely to piss Snit off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent.
--
Get Rich Slow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmOycD4yKU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 294 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 246:42:48 |
| Calls: | 6,626 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,175 |
| Messages: | 5,320,794 |