On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote <sgtla6$5i6$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is
extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's >>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of Ryan Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly?
On Sep 3, 2021 at 9:06:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<sgth5i$5i6$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2021-09-03, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2021-09-03, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
On Sep 2, 2021 at 9:06:25 PM MST, "LegionX"
wrote<sgs702$1dt$1@dont-email.me>:> John Lefting
<leftingpillock@arvada.org> Wrote in message:> >> YES OR NO.Simple answer,
even for you.> >There's absolutely no logical reason to assume "Ryan" was >>>>> real
There is plenty of evidence.
You have already shown *everyone* who participates on this
newsgroup that you do not understand what the word evidence
means. And you post snipped us again:
There's absolutely no logical reason to assume "Ryan" was real
anymore so than "HHI" and "Gremlin" all posting from the same
server aioe. The same server you're using as well as being a new
poster here. You have a very strong snit sock smell about
you.
You are of course correct. There are a lot of things snit has no
concept of and evidence is just one of the many.
His idea of evidence is a list of Google search links pointing to the
inaccurate, incorrect, seeding results of his flood bot.
The entire Ryan Sullivan affair smells like another one of snit's sock
puppet / shill games gone sour.
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is
extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's
not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
On 2021-09-03, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 9:06:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote >><sgth5i$5i6$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2021-09-03, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2021-09-03, LegionX <MichaelAndAnneGlasser@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
On Sep 2, 2021 at 9:06:25 PM MST, "LegionX"
wrote<sgs702$1dt$1@dont-email.me>:> John Lefting
<leftingpillock@arvada.org> Wrote in message:> >> YES OR NO.Simple answer,
even for you.> >There's absolutely no logical reason to assume "Ryan" was
real
There is plenty of evidence.
You have already shown *everyone* who participates on this
newsgroup that you do not understand what the word evidence
means. And you post snipped us again:
There's absolutely no logical reason to assume "Ryan" was real
anymore so than "HHI" and "Gremlin" all posting from the same
server aioe. The same server you're using as well as being a new
poster here. You have a very strong snit sock smell about
you.
You are of course correct. There are a lot of things snit has no
concept of and evidence is just one of the many.
His idea of evidence is a list of Google search links pointing to the
inaccurate, incorrect, seeding results of his flood bot.
The entire Ryan Sullivan affair smells like another one of snit's sock >>>> puppet / shill games gone sour.
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is
extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's
not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
On 2021-09-03 10:24 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<sgtla6$5i6$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is >>>>>> extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's >>>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of Ryan >> Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan
Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly? >>
I'll say this once:
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about
people.
On 2021-09-03 10:24 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<sgtla6$5i6$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is >>>>>> extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's >>>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of
Ryan
Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan
Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim
mindlessly?
I'll say this once:
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about
people.
On 2021-09-03 10:24 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote <sgtla6$5i6$6...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is >>>>> extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's >>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of Ryan Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly?
I'll say this once:
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about
people.
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about people.But only in ways that you cannot quote, right?
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote<sgtla6$5i6$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:>>>> The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting>>>> snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is>>>>extremely rare for someone to support snit.>>> >>> Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as>>> "evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.>> >>
Are you utterly denouncing Ryan Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly?
Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about people.But only in ways that you cannot quote, right?
You must have severe mental issues to keep making that claim
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of Ryan >> Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan
Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly?
You're creating scenarios that don't even exist.
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
Yes - he's lied about you, too.
On 03/09/2021 18:30, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2021-09-03 10:24 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 10:16:54 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<sgtla6$5i6$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting
snit. That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is >>>>>>> extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Exactly... and he's back to trying to sell his sock puppets as
"evidence". In the 'bad ol' days' he was never any good at it but he's >>>>>> not even making much of an attempt to hide it now. Weird.
Are you denying Ryan Sullivan is your son?
Are you denying that you ate a fecal butter sandwich prior to writing
this post?
Of course, but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of
Ryan
Sullivan as your son. Is that the case? Are you utterly denouncing Ryan
Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim
mindlessly?
I'll say this once:
I know for a personal certainty that Snit will deliberately lie about
people.
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
You are of course correct. There are a lot of things snit has no concept of and evidence is just one of the many.
His idea of evidence is a list of Google search links pointing to the inaccurate, incorrect, seeding results of his flood bot.
The entire Ryan Sullivan affair smells like another one ofsnit's sockpuppet / shill games gone sour.
The first clue, and there are several, is someone supporting snit.
That in and of itself should send up the alerts because it is extremely rare for someone to support snit.
Maybe we will get a front seat to a snit mental breakdown like happened over in CSMA when he got shunned.
But if anyone can reach that level of idiocy, our snit would be the one.
is plenty of evidence.>>>>> >>>>> You have already shown *everyone* who participates on this>>>>> newsgroup that you do not understand what the word evidence>>>>> means. And you post snipped us again:>>>>> There's absolutely no logical reason toassume "Ryan" was real>>>>> anymore so than "HHI" and "Gremlin" all posting from the same>>>>> server aioe. The same server you're using as well as being a new>>>>> poster here. You have a very strong snit sock smell about>>>>> you.>>>> >>>> You are of
You are probably making snit hungry.FWIW, if snit had even a scintilla of evidence regarding "RyanSullivan" being your son he would post it.
Since all he can up with is believing some one hit wonder poster's claims.I believe snit is behind most if not all of these one hit trolls because since he is mostly ignored it's his way of getting the attention he so craves.
He should put up or shut up because at this point he is just making himself look foolish.
And yet you can't either.
On Sep 3, 2021 at 4:59:18 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sgucsm$9vh$2@dont-email.me>:> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:> >> As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.> > Yes - he's lied about you, too.
Just in ways you cannot quote.
Of course
but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of RyanSullivan as your son. Is that the case?
Are you utterly denouncing Ryan Sullivan as your post makes clear, or did you make such a claim mindlessly?
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:
You are of course correct. There are a lot of things snit has no concept of >> and evidence is just one of the many.
We've noticed. Believe us we have. He's accused us of socking
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
Of course
We don't believe you.
We think you ate two for lunch and another
three for dinner.
but by analogy you are suggesting it is insane to think of RyanSullivan as >> your son. Is that the case?
Your analogy
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Sep 3, 2021 at 4:59:18 PM MST, "LegionX"
wrote<sgucsm$9vh$2@dont-email.me>:> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote >> in message:> >> As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO
Yes - he's lied about you, too.
Just in ways you cannot quote.
We wrote about the phonebook urls
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
And yet you can't either.
Are you denying you told FromTheRafters that Gremlin "made up"
your driving record?
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
On Sep 3, 2021 at 6:40:43 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sguiqr$qii$5@dont-email.me>:
Are you denying you told FromTheRafters that Gremlin "made up" your driving >>> record?
I'm noting how unable you are to understand what you read.
This is what you wrote:
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
And you lie about it non-stop. It's boring.
Snit you do realize that it's not difficult for anybody to fact
check us on this right?
And you lie about it non-stop. It's boring.
Are you denying you told FromTheRafters that Gremlin "made up" your driving record?
I'm noting how unable you are to understand what you read.
You have a need to rehash the same stuff over and over and you never understand.
Hence why: Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
The question is not what I wrote.
it is what you understood.
Remember (ifyou can) how I acknowledged your admission, Gremlin, that you are a mindless follower who merely picked up lies from others and then repeated them.
You do that a lot.
You did that with the claim I might be Chelsea Manning.
You simply are a mindless follower.
But the fact this is settled does not matter to you -- you simply cannot understand what you read.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
The question is not what I wrote.
Yes it is.
How did we fail to understand what we read?
You're a habitual liar snit.
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
Yes - he's lied about you, too. When Gremlin pointed out that you
asked snit to check the cell number he got from Gremlin against
phone book urls.
Snit replied that Gremlin wrote a "direct lie" and that you never
asked him any such thing. You did and snit tried to help you with
the phonebook urls - just as Gremlin wrote.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
No. That might have been the question, but it was replied to. You simply are >> not able to understand what you read.
Remember: when you, Gremlin, admitted that you are just a mindless sheep who >> bought the words of others trolling I gladly accepted that. You are, Gremlin,
a mindless sheep. As such, sure, you are not the one coming up with the idiocy
you spew (or at least not all of it). This was the same with the Chelsea
Manning nonsense you glommed onto like the mindless sheep you present
yourself.
And now you will STILL not get it and just repeat... because you present
yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud. You really seem unable to help >> it, no matter what name you use.
How did we fail to understand what we read?
Could be because you are just stupid, or maybe you are just trolling. Maybe >> you are too angry to figure out simple language. I do not care. Not my job to
figure out your issues -- that is YOUR job. Go get help.
We don't understand what you mean snit.
Would it be to much to ask
for you to clarify exactly what you mean by it was replied
to?
That might have been the question, but it was replied to.
You simply are not able to understand what you read.
Remember: when you, Gremlin, admitted that you are just a mindless sheep who bought the words of others trolling I gladly accepted that.
And now you will STILL not get it and just repeat.
you present yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud.
How did we fail to understand what we read?Could be because you are just stupid, or maybe you are just trolling.
But only in ways that cannot be quoted.
Weird how that works.
On 04/09/2021 00:59, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
Yes - he's lied about you, too. When Gremlin pointed out that you
asked snit to check the cell number he got from Gremlin against
phone book urls.
Snit replied that Gremlin wrote a "direct lie" and that you never
asked him any such thing. You did and snit tried to help you with
the phonebook urls - just as Gremlin wrote.
That was a mistake and he apologised for it.
For the record, I didn't want the phone number for my personal use. I
was suggesting where your phone number MIGHT be found if you were
running a genuine business.
Tell everyone why you live in fear of discovery.
On Sep 4, 2021 at 12:01:39 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sgv5kk$6m0$1...@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 04/09/2021 00:59, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
Yes - he's lied about you, too. When Gremlin pointed out that you
asked snit to check the cell number he got from Gremlin against
phone book urls.
Snit replied that Gremlin wrote a "direct lie" and that you never
asked him any such thing. You did and snit tried to help you with
the phonebook urls - just as Gremlin wrote.
That was a mistake and he apologised for it.Correct. And it has been covered many times. Gremlin is simply incapable of understanding what he reads.
For the record, I didn't want the phone number for my personal use. IAnd it was AFTER he had given me public, written permission to share it -- and
was suggesting where your phone number MIGHT be found if you were
running a genuine business.
I still would not.
Now it shows up on many searches.
Tell everyone why you live in fear of discovery.Hence why he is now pretending to not be himself.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
That might have been the question, but it was replied to.We don't understand what you mean snit. Would it be to much to ask
for you to clarify exactly what you mean by it was replied
to?
You simply are not able to understand what you read.We understood that you told FromTheRafters that Gremlin "made up"
your driving record:
Message-ID: <XDiRI.969$B8...@fx19.iad>
<http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=162916852300>
From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Newsgroups:
alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: time To Drop The Hammer On Snit...
Gremlin flipped his truck and now is trying to blame me for some
driving record he made up. News at 11.
Please explain how we're unable to understand what we read. Your
post is above. Your words are right there snit. In that post, you
*are* claiming that Gremlin "made up" your driving record. The
one that was shared in the snitfiles has whitepages markings all
over it snit. Gremlin didn't make up any driving record. And he
certainly didn't add a fake one to public records databases you
lying piece of shit.
Remember: when you, Gremlin, admitted that you are just a mindless sheep who bought the words of others trolling I gladly accepted that.Remember: snit that you've only been accusing us of socking
because we caught you socking up as Sigmond and we provided
reasonable evidence that you did it.
We have no idea where you're getting the mindless sheep
description from; unless it's your latest nonsense intended to be
picked up and repeated by the bot for search engine seeding.
Might that be what you're doing? :)
Although we shouldn't laugh at the mistakes you make because of
your mental retardation - we sometimes do. This is one of those
times.
And now you will STILL not get it and just repeat.We haven't missed anything snit. You got caught lying about
Gremlin again.
you present yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud.You've never supported that accusation either. Even though you've
been asked to do so many times. You consistently fail. Failure is
your lifes work though.
How did we fail to understand what we read?Could be because you are just stupid, or maybe you are just trolling. Message-ID: <XDiRI.969$B8...@fx19.iad>
<http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=162916852300>
From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Newsgroups:
alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: time To Drop The Hammer On Snit...
Gremlin flipped his truck and now is trying to blame me for some
driving record he made up. News at 11.
Snit it's simply not possible for us to have misunderstood what
you wrote. It's plain to see. You told FromTheRafters that
Gremlin "made up" your driving record. You *lied* about Gremlin.
Again.
Maybeyou are too angry to figure out simple language. I do not
care. Not my job tofigure out your issues -- that is YOUR job. Go
get help.> You're a habitual liar snit.
But only in ways that cannot be quoted.You're a habitual liar snit michael glasser. Here's one of your
more recent lies about Gremlin:
Message-ID: <XDiRI.969$B8...@fx19.iad>
<http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=162916852300>
From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Newsgroups:
alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: time To Drop The Hammer On Snit...
Gremlin flipped his truck and now is trying to blame me for some
driving record he made up. News at 11.
Weird how that works.
According to the above, it clearly doesn't. You're a very
dishonest individual snit michael glasser. And you're a usenet
troll with a drug problem. You can't hide it anymore.
--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
And don't forget when you call to:
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and don't forget to ask about
his eyeball loss hallucination - It was scary bad! Heavy pharma
abuse = a Snit
On Sep 4, 2021 at 12:01:39 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sgv5kk$6m0$1...@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 04/09/2021 00:59, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - or lied TO me.
Yes - he's lied about you, too. When Gremlin pointed out that you
asked snit to check the cell number he got from Gremlin against
phone book urls.
Snit replied that Gremlin wrote a "direct lie" and that you never
asked him any such thing. You did and snit tried to help you with
the phonebook urls - just as Gremlin wrote.
That was a mistake and he apologised for it.Correct. And it has been covered many times. Gremlin is simply incapable of understanding what he reads.
For the record, I didn't want the phone number for my personal use. IAnd it was AFTER he had given me public, written permission to share it -- and
was suggesting where your phone number MIGHT be found if you were
running a genuine business.
I still would not.
Now it shows up on many searches.
Tell everyone why you live in fear of discovery.Hence why he is now pretending to not be himself.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
That was a mistake and he apologised for it.
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
That was a mistake and he apologised for it.
We must have read different posts. Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
The one we read from snit didn't show an apology ...
And he didn't write the apology for several days.
On Sep 4, 2021 at 12:01:39 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote<sgv5kk$6m0$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:> On 04/09/2021 00:59, LegionX wrote:>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:>> >>> As far as I'm aware he has never lied /about/ me - orlied TO me.>> >> Yes - he's lied about you, too. When Gremlin pointed out that you>> asked snit to check the cell number he got from Gremlin against>> phone book urls.>> >> Snit replied that Gremlin wrote a "direct lie" and that you never>> asked
Correct. And it has been covered many times. Gremlin is simply incapable ofunderstanding what he reads.
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
On 06/09/2021 15:16, LegionX wrote:
Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.l inux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID: <hqq3ko...@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass> <XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp> <hq2g4c...@mid.individual.net> <XnsAC1EBC...@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8KnKb.nd>
I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or
whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your
perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely
trivial, it
counts. *Sorry for my error on that*.
=
HTH
On Sep 6, 2021 at 9:45:08 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sh5gip$mfp$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 06/09/2021 15:16, LegionX wrote:
Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.l
inux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID: <hqq3ko...@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass>
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
<hq2g4c...@mid.individual.net>
<XnsAC1EBC...@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8KnKb.nd>
I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or
whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your
perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely
trivial, it
counts. *Sorry for my error on that*.
=
HTH
Yup. I did not consider a quick search to be anything significant. Those of us
who habitually help others just do small things like this. But I did deny it, and doing so was in error. I made a mistake.
But Gremlin cannot move forward.
Now when will he admit he was wrong to claim I said he lived in Johnson City?
Oh. Never.
When will he admit it is wrong for him to lie about my wife, and my personal life?
Oh. Never.
He does not care to be honest or accurate.
On 06/09/2021 17:53, Snit wrote:
On Sep 6, 2021 at 9:45:08 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sh5gip$mfp$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 06/09/2021 15:16, LegionX wrote:
Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.l
inux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID: <hqq3ko...@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass>
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
<hq2g4c...@mid.individual.net>
<XnsAC1EBC...@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8KnKb.nd>
I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or
whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your
perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely
trivial, it
counts. *Sorry for my error on that*.
=
HTH
Yup. I did not consider a quick search to be anything significant. Those of us
who habitually help others just do small things like this. But I did deny it,
and doing so was in error. I made a mistake.
The man who didn't make a mistake never made anything!
https://www.forbes.com/quotes/2657/
But Gremlin cannot move forward.
Now when will he admit he was wrong to claim I said he lived in Johnson City?
Oh. Never.
When will he admit it is wrong for him to lie about my wife, and my personal >> life?
Oh. Never.
He does not care to be honest or accurate.
On 06/09/2021 17:53, Snit wrote:
On Sep 6, 2021 at 9:45:08 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sh5gip$mfp$1...@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 06/09/2021 15:16, LegionX wrote:
Do you have the MID to the one
you read?
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.l
inux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID: <hqq3ko...@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass>
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
<hq2g4c...@mid.individual.net>
<XnsAC1EBC...@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8KnKb.nd>
I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or
whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your
perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely
trivial, it
counts. *Sorry for my error on that*.
=
HTH
Yup. I did not consider a quick search to be anything significant. Those of usThe man who didn't make a mistake never made anything!
who habitually help others just do small things like this. But I did deny it,
and doing so was in error. I made a mistake.
https://www.forbes.com/quotes/2657/
But Gremlin cannot move forward.
Now when will he admit he was wrong to claim I said he lived in Johnson City?
Oh. Never.
When will he admit it is wrong for him to lie about my wife, and my personal
life?
Oh. Never.
He does not care to be honest or accurate.
Do you have the MID to the one> you read?
HTH
Do you have the MID to the one> you read?
HTH
What we provided
isn't an apology.
Why do you present yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud so often?
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B" <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try here:- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingsport-tn/computer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
But I did deny it
Yes for several days you denied it
But I did deny it
and doing so was in error.
I made a mistake.
But Gremlin cannot move forward.
He does not care to be honest or accurate.
On Sep 6, 2021 at 5:41:44 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote <sh6cg8$7lr$1...@dont-email.me>:
Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
Why do you present yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud so often?
Why aren't you ever able to provide evidence to support yourYou snipped them. But here is more evidence. <XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
slimey accusations snit?
-----
Prior to my giving you that cell number, there was no way
at all for you to link it to me in any possible way shape
or form. it doesn't come up in any records search on me.
It is using a recycled number, but damn near everything is
these days so that doesn't count as public information,
snit.
...
As in, the cell doesn't come back to me, wouldn't ever
come back to me, therefore the fact *I* have that cell
number is NOT public information. I find it very hard to
believe that even you'd have difficulty understanding this
concept.
-----
<XnsAC32AD...@VoX89Pwp95.083.GODrcd>
-----
I've only been sharing whats available via a public
database. You haven't. :)
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
You cannot find any link to that number to me on any
database. Which makes it private. not public as you
incorrectly assume.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
No, it's not. You already tried to link the two of us
previously.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not a publically known number that links to me. And
he knows that.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
The number is NOT TIED TO ME in any public database, in
any way shape or form. You cannot get the number aside
from my having provided it to you via a google search or a
public records search.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
Regardless of where the number shows up, it doesn't tie
itself to me, and you cannot associate the number with me
via a google search, OR any number of free/paid public
records searches. Therefore, that is PRIVATE information
that you think you're holding over my head, not public as
you erroneously think here.
-----
<XnsAC34A6...@1b2yUZpg51V1q.6EF009.jKrc>
-----
It's not, running my name doesn't provide that cell
number. The two are not linked in any way shape or form.
The number itself as is the case with any recycled number
is in all kinds of databases, but it's not linked to me;
therefore, that IS PRIVATE information that you can't get
via a google search or a paid public records search.
-----
<XnsAC1D79...@889n4Sx8GWE.MNnkz50hZNVS.fh0SYyRp>
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----
<XnsAC17C6...@4uMkH0FFER6s72gSy7J8N4B67.Mht3WTC373bt67J31gn>
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----
<XnsAC212D...@gt3i2B7y.5N0FOv3e210vLOej4O4doj8b>
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a fuckup on his part
by now? :)
-----
<XnsAC2110...@3R4NM89td0T86C.231IPkH>
-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from. :)
-----
So easy to show... and in response to your links:
Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook: <https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
Functionally Illiterate Fraud: <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
He still doesn't know why we asked him about scientology. So we're
going to tell all of you what's up with our question.
Scientologists are worse than a bill collector and a jehovas
witness combined. Especially if you...filled out a contact form
and expressed a desire to learn more. If you purchased a few
items confirming your interest is serious - they'll come to talk
with you in person to recruit you. and they are not easy to be
rid of. More so if you happened to have explained some mental
problems and shyness you'd like them to help you
overcome.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 56:07:23 |
| Calls: | 6,652 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,200 |
| Messages: | 5,330,863 |