Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a BTmail account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an 'upgrade'
to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain - but does still work with BT.
In users, I've changed <pophost.123-reg.co.uk> to <imap.123-reg.co.uk:995> which is about as far as I got by reading the blurb on the 123 site.
But then it doesn't work with Thunderbird either.
In message <5969d6cbecdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a BTmail
account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an 'upgrade'
to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain - but >> does still work with BT.
For the 'Incoming mail' section, enter imap.123-reg.co.uk as the incoming mail server and use 993 for the Port. For the encryption method, select SSL/TLS.
For the 'Outgoing mail' section, enter smtp.123-reg.co.uk as the outgoing mail server and use 465 for the Port. For the encryption method, select SSL/TLS.
I found the information via the following URL:
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/support/email/how-do-i-set-up-an-email-client-wi th-123-mail/
all one line!
They have a specific section on Thunderbird on that page as well.
I think the issue here is that Dave is using Popstar as the transport mechanism for email for the RISCOS side and that is not IMAP compliant.
He needs to either have a a IMAP complaint RISCOS client, MessengerPro
does this, or as suggested use Thunderbird on Windows/Linux.
In message <199e4b6a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
In message <5969d6cbecdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a
BTmail account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an
'upgrade' to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain
- but does still work with BT.
[snip]
For the 'Incoming mail' section, enter imap.123-reg.co.uk as the
incoming mail server and use 993 for the Port. For the encryption
method, select SSL/TLS.
For the 'Outgoing mail' section, enter smtp.123-reg.co.uk as the
outgoing mail server and use 465 for the Port. For the encryption
method, select SSL/TLS.
I found the information via the following URL:
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/support/email/how-do-i-set-up-an-email-client-wi th-123-mail/
all one line!
They have a specific section on Thunderbird on that page as well.
I think the issue here is that Dave is using Popstar as the transport mechanism for email for the RISCOS side and that is not IMAP compliant.
He needs to either have a a IMAP complaint RISCOS client, MessengerPro
does this, or as suggested use Thunderbird on Windows/Linux.
There was a RISCOS Thunderbird release but it is old so may have
security or operability issues now and it was only ever a alpha status release.
One other way that may be possible is he could forward his 123-reg
hosted email to BT and download them there via POP/POPStar as that
still works with Popstar from what Dave say.
In message <199e4b6a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
In message <5969d6cbecdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a BTmail >>> account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an 'upgrade' >>> to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain - but >>> does still work with BT.
[snip]
For the 'Incoming mail' section, enter imap.123-reg.co.uk as the incoming
mail server and use 993 for the Port. For the encryption method, select
SSL/TLS.
For the 'Outgoing mail' section, enter smtp.123-reg.co.uk as the outgoing
mail server and use 465 for the Port. For the encryption method, select
SSL/TLS.
I found the information via the following URL:
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/support/email/how-do-i-set-up-an-email-client-wi >> th-123-mail/
all one line!
They have a specific section on Thunderbird on that page as well.
I think the issue here is that Dave is using Popstar as the transport mechanism for email for the RISCOS side and that is not IMAP compliant.
He needs to either have a a IMAP complaint RISCOS client, MessengerPro
does this, or as suggested use Thunderbird on Windows/Linux.
There was a RISCOS Thunderbird release but it is old so may have security
or operability issues now and it was only ever a alpha status release.
One other way that may be possible is he could forward his 123-reg hosted email to BT and download them there via POP/POPStar as that still works
with Popstar from what Dave say.
Remember IMAP means your emails that are sent to you are stored on their servers.
I think the issue here is that Dave is using Popstar as the transport
mechanism for email for the RISCOS side and that is not IMAP compliant.
Actually he would need NetFetch/Hermes as his email transport, its Hermes which is up to date and would replace PopStar and handles IMAP and up to
date SSL connections.
He needs to either have a a IMAP complaint RISCOS client, MessengerPro
does this, or as suggested use Thunderbird on Windows/Linux.
NetFetch/Hermes for the email transport and Messenger Pro or Pluto as the client would be answer.
Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:
I think the issue here is that Dave is using Popstar as the transport mechanism for email for the RISCOS side and that is not IMAP compliant.
He needs to either have a a IMAP complaint RISCOS client, MessengerPro
does this, or as suggested use Thunderbird on Windows/Linux.
pop.123-reg.co.uk does exist and appears to be listening for POP mail on
both port 110 and 995. Try that?
Although that may be the service they are planning to turn off, I don't
know.
Over in uk.d-i-y, where Dave also asked this question, a 123-reg user mentioned 'pophost' was an older server which may be the thing they're turning off, rather than all POP. It appears pophost.123-reg.co.uk and pop.123-reg.co.uk resolve to different IP addresses, so are different servers.
NetFetch/Hermes for the email transport and Messenger Pro or Pluto as
the client would be answer.
In article <ef83536a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>,
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
NetFetch/Hermes for the email transport and Messenger Pro or Pluto as
the client would be answer.
Thanks, Chris. I'll get them.
Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a BTmail >account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an 'upgrade'
to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain - but >does still work with BT.
In users, I've changed <pophost.123-reg.co.uk> to <imap.123-reg.co.uk:995> >which is about as far as I got by reading the blurb on the 123 site.
But then it doesn't work with Thunderbird either.
In message <596ac2714edave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
In article <ef83536a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>,
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
NetFetch/Hermes for the email transport and Messenger Pro or Pluto as
the client would be answer.
Thanks, Chris. I'll get them.
Dave,
I would check with RComp first about IMAP use in NetFetch/Hermes as
according to their webpage it states only this for NetFetch/Hermes:
So no mention of IMAP but their MessengerPro page says this:
So as I believe it is MessengerPro that does IMAP but not Netfetch/Hermes.
In message <5969d6cbecdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
Have my own domain hosted by 123-reg. Only used for email. Also a BTmail >account.
123 reg have abolished pophost. On their website, they did an 'upgrade'
to imap.
And of course POPstar no longer downloads my emails from that domain - but >does still work with BT.
In users, I've changed <pophost.123-reg.co.uk> to <imap.123-reg.co.uk:995> >which is about as far as I got by reading the blurb on the 123 site.
My settings with Hermes for 132 reg is
POP3 mail server:
pop.123-reg.co.uk
Port:
110
But then it doesn't work with Thunderbird either.
In article <ef83536a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>,
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
NetFetch/Hermes for the email transport and Messenger Pro or Pluto as
the client would be answer.
Thanks, Chris. I'll get them.
Think you'll find pop.123-reg.co.uk is being phased out. Hence my problem.
In message <93d6d16a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
Windows programs like Thunderbird, Outlook and say Windows Mail, combine
the mail transport and email client functions into the one program.
Whereas on RISCOS they are basically two programmes. Hermes/Popstar and
your email client Messenger Pro/Pluto
You keep saying this Chris and you are right to a certain extent.
NetFetch/Hermes provide a POP/SMTP set of transports but not a IMAP/SMTP
set.
On 12 Sep, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
<596ad59f38dave@davenoise.co.uk>:
Think you'll find pop.123-reg.co.uk is being phased out. Hence my problem.
Various posters have now said that pophost.123-reg.co.uk is the one being phased out, while pop.123-reg.co.uk isn't? It's worth checking to confirm,
as staying with POP on a different server is the easy option.
I would check with RComp first about IMAP use in NetFetch/Hermes as
according to their webpage it states only this for NetFetch/Hermes:
IMAP is a protocol. Hermes/Netfetch, provide the mail transport functions
to communicate with mail servers.
So no mention of IMAP but their MessengerPro page says this:
Messenger Pro has a built in IMAP server facility correct but its for your internal network as far as I am awhere.
Windows programs like Thunderbird, Outlook and say Windows Mail, combine
the mail transport and email client functions into the one program.
Whereas on RISCOS they are basically two programmes. Hermes/Popstar and
your email client Messenger Pro/Pluto
In message <0483e26a59.dougjwebb@btinternet.com>
Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:
In message <93d6d16a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
Windows programs like Thunderbird, Outlook and say Windows Mail, combine >>> the mail transport and email client functions into the one program.
Whereas on RISCOS they are basically two programmes. Hermes/Popstar and
your email client Messenger Pro/Pluto
You keep saying this Chris and you are right to a certain extent.
NetFetch/Hermes provide a POP/SMTP set of transports but not a IMAP/SMTP
set.
I'm going to correct myself and add to the confusion as later versions of MesengerPro include Hermetic which allow a more limited capability to use Pop/SMTP without Netfetch/Hermes.
In effect Netfetch/Hermes is a more capable setup for Pop/SMTP and of
course you can use it with any email programs like MessengerPro/Pluto etc.
As I said Dave may be best calling RComp and discussing his options after
he has confirmed with 123-reg if it is pophost or pop versions of their
email servers that are being withdrawn or both.
Doug, up thread I have already provided the necessary details to be
entered into Hermes for it to work, taken directly from the 123.reg
website advising what logon/netowrk details you need.
I will quote it again. The same info works with Thunderbird
Quote:
123.reg website says the settings should be.
For the 'Incoming mail' section, enter imap.123-reg.co.uk as the incoming mail server and use 993 for the Port. For the encryption method, select SSL/TLS.
For the 'Outgoing mail' section, enter smtp.123-reg.co.uk as the outgoing mail server and use 465 for the Port. For the encryption method, select SSL/TLS.
I found the information via the following URL:
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/support/email/how-do-i-set-up-an-email-client-wi th-123-mail/
all one line!
They have a specific section on Thunderbird on that page as well.
As I said Dave may be best calling RComp and discussing his options after
he has confirmed with 123-reg if it is pophost or pop versions of their
email servers that are being withdrawn or both.
On 12 Sep, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
<596ad59f38dave@davenoise.co.uk>:
Think you'll find pop.123-reg.co.uk is being phased out. Hence my problem.
Various posters have now said that pophost.123-reg.co.uk is the one being phased out, while pop.123-reg.co.uk isn't? It's worth checking to confirm,
as staying with POP on a different server is the easy option.
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
In message <93d6d16a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
Messenger Pro has a built in IMAP server facility correct but its for your >> internal network as far as I am awhere.
You can use it to attach to your email server where ever that is on your Lan/WAN/Internet etc.
In effect it is no different to POP in that you still connect to a email server but in a different way and using a more modern set of protocols and gives the ability to synchronise etc.
It is better for use when you have multiple products phones/tablets/pc etc that people have and use on the move.
You can use it to attach to your email server where ever that is on your
Lan/WAN/Internet etc.
In effect it is no different to POP in that you still connect to a email
server but in a different way and using a more modern set of protocols and >> gives the ability to synchronise etc.
It is a bit different to POP; with POP you download the email from the
server to your device, where it is then stored and available even when offline. With IMAP the email usually remains stored on the server, not locally, and you need to be online to read it.
Just remember if storing on someone else's server, it may not be backed
up, and there may be a limited amount of space, which can be used up if
you get a lot of large attachments.
In message <596b555c9adave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
pop.123-reg.co.uk
David
In message <0483e26a59.dougjwebb@btinternet.com>
Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:
In message <93d6d16a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
Windows programs like Thunderbird, Outlook and say Windows Mail, combine >> the mail transport and email client functions into the one program.
Whereas on RISCOS they are basically two programmes. Hermes/Popstar and
your email client Messenger Pro/Pluto
You keep saying this Chris and you are right to a certain extent.
NetFetch/Hermes provide a POP/SMTP set of transports but not a IMAP/SMTP set.
I'm going to correct myself and add to the confusion as later versions of MesengerPro include Hermetic which allow a more limited capability to use Pop/SMTP without Netfetch/Hermes.
In effect Netfetch/Hermes is a more capable setup for Pop/SMTP and of
course you can use it with any email programs like MessengerPro/Pluto etc.
As I said Dave may be best calling RComp and discussing his options after
he has confirmed with 123-reg if it is pophost or pop versions of their
email servers that are being withdrawn or both.
In article <3791746b59.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>,
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
In message <596b555c9adave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
pop.123-reg.co.uk
David
I've tried replacing pophost with that using my original 'name' before the
@. No joy. 123-reg have said the problem is fixed. But no information on what I have to change (or not) my end. (For Thunderbird, as I accept
POPstar is not going to work. But if it doesn't work with Thunderbird, I'm not holding my breath that it will work with Netfetch.
Spoke to yet another on their helpline, who's raised another ticket. The video tutorials on their site bear no relation to what I see on my control panel. So assume are for a totally different email package.
In article <cec2e36a59.dougjwebb@btinternet.com>,
Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:
In message <0483e26a59.dougjwebb@btinternet.com>
Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:
In message <93d6d16a59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
Windows programs like Thunderbird, Outlook and say Windows Mail, combine >>>> the mail transport and email client functions into the one program.
Whereas on RISCOS they are basically two programmes. Hermes/Popstar and >>>> your email client Messenger Pro/Pluto
You keep saying this Chris and you are right to a certain extent.
NetFetch/Hermes provide a POP/SMTP set of transports but not a IMAP/SMTP >>> set.
I'm going to correct myself and add to the confusion as later versions of
MesengerPro include Hermetic which allow a more limited capability to use
Pop/SMTP without Netfetch/Hermes.
In effect Netfetch/Hermes is a more capable setup for Pop/SMTP and of
course you can use it with any email programs like MessengerPro/Pluto etc.
As I said Dave may be best calling RComp and discussing his options after
he has confirmed with 123-reg if it is pophost or pop versions of their
email servers that are being withdrawn or both.
Not being able to buy Netfetch online (using Firefox and Win10) I phoned RComp. They said it won't work with Pluto for imap. But supply Messenger
with it which will.
In article <3791746b59.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>,
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
In message <596b555c9adave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
pop.123-reg.co.uk
I've tried replacing pophost with that using my original 'name' before the
@.
In message <596c68fabbdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
In article <3791746b59.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>,
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
In message <596b555c9adave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
pop.123-reg.co.uk
David
I've tried replacing pophost with that using my original 'name' before the @. No joy. 123-reg have said the problem is fixed. But no information on what I have to change (or not) my end. (For Thunderbird, as I accept POPstar is not going to work. But if it doesn't work with Thunderbird, I'm not holding my breath that it will work with Netfetch.
Did they tell you to do that?
Have you followed the help link earlier in the thread from the 123 reg support site re Thunderbird setup?
Spoke to yet another on their helpline, who's raised another ticket. The video tutorials on their site bear no relation to what I see on my control panel. So assume are for a totally different email package.
To be honest they should be able to update your control panel for you.
In article <a712766c59.chris@mytarbis.plus.com>,
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
In message <596c68fabbdave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
In article <3791746b59.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>,
David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
In message <596b555c9adave@davenoise.co.uk>
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
BTW, if the pophost is being phased out, what would the new one be called?
pop.123-reg.co.uk
David
I've tried replacing pophost with that using my original 'name' before the >>> @. No joy. 123-reg have said the problem is fixed. But no information on >>> what I have to change (or not) my end. (For Thunderbird, as I accept
POPstar is not going to work. But if it doesn't work with Thunderbird, I'm >>> not holding my breath that it will work with Netfetch.
Did they tell you to do that?
Have you followed the help link earlier in the thread from the 123 reg
support site re Thunderbird setup?
Spoke to yet another on their helpline, who's raised another ticket. The >>> video tutorials on their site bear no relation to what I see on my control >>> panel. So assume are for a totally different email package.
To be honest they should be able to update your control panel for you.
I've now spoken to 3 different people on their helpline. All have been
unable to see what the problem is and have escalated it to their 'pros'.
Who will get back to me - except they haven't. Over a week now.
So I raise a ticket myself by text on their contact page.
This is the reply I got:-
**********************
Thank you for contacting us.
The dave@ is an email forwarder, not a mailbox, so it's expected for you
not to be able to access it.
Unfortunately, a forwarder cannot be a mailbox as well as they fulfill different functions.
A forwarder is just like a signpost that redirects emails. It doesn't have any login credentials, storage space, etc. and you cannot set it up into
an email client, that's why it can't be a mailbox as well.
This means that if you want to access it, you would first need to delete
the forwarder and then create the same email address as a mailbox instead.
When the mailbox is created, emails won't be forwarded anymore to your @btinternet.com address but sent to the newly created mailbox so you will
be able to reply directly from it.
Kind Regards, Raluca 123 Reg
******************
Ok - so I attempt to do this and get:-
***************
"Error: You don't have enough Personal Email. Please buy a Personal Email package and try again."
**************
I paid my year in advance subscription for the mail service I had (that worked just fine) in June. Weeks later, they decide to make it stop
working.
You will only have paid for a 'parking' address by the sound of it plus a domain, i.e. one that forwards dave@davenoise.co.uk, to your I assume ISP email server (BT internet I think you said).
Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
You will only have paid for a 'parking' address by the sound of it plus a domain, i.e. one that forwards dave@davenoise.co.uk, to your I assume ISP email server (BT internet I think you said).
123-reg offer that by default on their domain registration:
Free email forwarding
Look professional, credible and unique with free email forwarding. All mail to anyone@yourdomain.co.uk can be sent to any other email address, so you look professional without needing another email service. https://www.123-reg.co.uk/domain-names/
but to get a mailbox you'd need to take out their email hosting package in addition:
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/email-hosting/
Of course that's their current offer - it may be Dave is on some legacy package that offers something different.
It was set up some 20 years ago, and never needed to touch it - until now.
Since I'm getting nowhere with their help facilities, I purchased their 'starter' at 99p a month for the first year. On entering my @davesound address, it said you already have that as a mailbox. But took my money anyway.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 214:46:57 |
Calls: | 6,619 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,168 |
Messages: | 5,317,487 |