John Sandford <lists@thesandfords.me.uk> wrote:
Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> wrote:
For as long as I've been using a Start Menu - i.e. since it first
appeared - mine has had things arranged on it in a sensible hierarchy
(and very little on the 'Desktop') - although since Windows 8, I've
begrudgingly learned to live without it.
Have a look at True launch Bar ( a bit like menu bar) this can be used to
give a Start menu all Programs like menu on the taskbar.
It's no longer necessary. The most important thing is to avoid the annoying Start Screen, and I'm doing that quite successfully. :)
Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> wrote:
For as long as I've been using a Start Menu - i.e. since it first
appeared - mine has had things arranged on it in a sensible hierarchy
(and very little on the 'Desktop') - although since Windows 8, I've begrudgingly learned to live without it.
Have a look at True launch Bar ( a bit like menu bar) this can be used to give a Start menu all Programs like menu on the taskbar.
Vince M Hudd wrote:
Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC OS I'd use GNU/Linux.
Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of
Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC OS
I'd use GNU/Linux.
In article <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4>, Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net> wrote:
Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC OS I'd use GNU/Linux.
It can be done by using RPCEmu but, in my limited experience of that emulator, it is not nearly as polished nor as easy to install as VRPC from Virtual Acorn.
On 6 Feb, John wrote in message
<554dbe57c0newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk>:
In article <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4>, Krzysztof Staniorowski
<helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net> wrote:
Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of Windows? If I had to
dedicate a PC for virtual RISC OS I'd use GNU/Linux.
It can be done by using RPCEmu but, in my limited experience of that
emulator, it is not nearly as polished nor as easy to install as VRPC from >> Virtual Acorn.
I don't know what current versions of VA are like, but I'm finding the current RPCEmu + RISC OS 5.23 more stable than post-Iyonix native hardware
at present.
On 6 Feb, John wrote in message
<554dbe57c0newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk>:
In article <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4>,
Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net>
wrote:
Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of
Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC
OS I'd use GNU/Linux.
It can be done by using RPCEmu but, in my limited
experience of that emulator, it is not nearly as
polished nor as easy to install as VRPC from Virtual
Acorn.
I don't know what current versions of VA are like, but
I'm finding the current RPCEmu + RISC OS 5.23 more stable
than post-Iyonix native hardware at present.
For as long as I've been using a Start Menu - i.e. since it first appeared
- mine has had things arranged on it in a sensible hierarchy (and very
little on the 'Desktop') - although since Windows 8, I've begrudgingly learned to live without it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 223:48:23 |
| Calls: | 6,623 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,318,370 |