• A small hitch with Agony

    From Zaghadka@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 28 09:00:13 2023
    I recently checked my install of Agony Unrated on Steam and found it
    wanted me to "purchase" it. I thought, "WTF? I bought the unrated
    version."

    Turns out they moved "unrated" to a DLC, and I had to "buy" it. It was
    free. Possibly because I had already purchased it, possibly because it's
    now free to anyone.

    I think it was a move to protect the kiddies from accidental anatomy
    lessons.

    Anyway, you may want to grab that particular DLC before they make it
    paid. You may not.

    --
    Zag

    West of House
    There is a small mailbox here.

    read leaflet
    "WELCOME TO USENET!

    USENET is a game of adventure, danger,
    and low cunning. In it you will
    explore some of the most amazing
    territory ever seen by mortals. No
    computer should be without it!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 28 11:18:15 2023
    On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:00:13 -0500, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    I recently checked my install of Agony Unrated on Steam and found it
    wanted me to "purchase" it. I thought, "WTF? I bought the unrated
    version."

    Turns out they moved "unrated" to a DLC, and I had to "buy" it. It was
    free. Possibly because I had already purchased it, possibly because it's
    now free to anyone.

    I think it was a move to protect the kiddies from accidental anatomy
    lessons.

    Anyway, you may want to grab that particular DLC before they make it
    paid. You may not.


    Googling the issue, ths convoluted solution seems to be a reaction to
    various national censorship laws.

    There are two SKUs on Steam; the original "Agony" and a newer "Agony
    UNRATED". The latter has received significant code and visual updates
    over the original and so the developers wanted to sell it as an
    updated version.

    However, the naughty 'unrated' bits would have gotten the game banned
    in some countries (Germany is frequently mentioned, which is
    unsurprising as the BPjS / BPjM index is renowned for its strictness).
    So to get around this - and ensure players could get the most updated
    version - the 'unrated' parts were separated into a DLC. That way the
    DLC could be banned while the main game slipped through.

    Why they don't just backport the updates to the original SKU remains unanswered. Hypothesis range from that it would be such a significant
    rewrite of the original code that it's not worth the effort;
    alternately, the developers are greedy pricks and want people to buy
    their game twice. I've no information, and no opinion on the matter.


    Looking at the game itself, the conceit is interesting but it feels
    very try-hard in how extreme it is; sure, Hell is supposed to be an
    awful place full of awful people, but the developers seem to take a
    shamelessly sophomoric glee in unnecessarily showing all the worst
    aspects of the place. I get a lot of "Postal" vibes from the game; 'Hurkhurkhurk, you can EAT a baby in our game; we're so EXTREME!' Unfortunately, the gameplay, from what I've seen, doesn't look
    particularly engaging either. So once you get past the shock value of
    the piece I'm not sure there's any real point to playing it.



    Looking

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)