• Spain + lootboxes

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 7 10:20:46 2022
    Well as this is often a hot subject with 'gamers' I think this is
    interesting news. It seems Spain is introducing new legislation that effectively says, you can still have lootboxes in games but if you do
    then you need to have an age verification system in place. How this will
    impact games I'm not sure but my guess is just that if you're in Spain
    then lootboxes won't be available to anyone as companies won't want the
    hassle of age verification that will fulfil the requirement.

    https://igamingbusiness.com/spain-ban-loot-boxes-minors/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@21:1/5 to JAB on Thu Jul 7 11:55:29 2022
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:20:46 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    Well as this is often a hot subject with 'gamers' I think this is
    interesting news. It seems Spain is introducing new legislation that >effectively says, you can still have lootboxes in games but if you do
    then you need to have an age verification system in place. How this will >impact games I'm not sure but my guess is just that if you're in Spain
    then lootboxes won't be available to anyone as companies won't want the >hassle of age verification that will fulfil the requirement.

    https://igamingbusiness.com/spain-ban-loot-boxes-minors/

    Its largely falls into the 'something must be done, this is something'
    cover used by politicians the world over. It is largely theater. It
    isn't completely toothless, but even "documentary age verification" is
    fairly easily bypassed, especially when it fails to enforce any
    penalties for lying about your age (all penalties are afforded to the
    game publisher).

    The only other thing of note is that publishers must list the
    probability of obtaining various objects. But the rest is fairly
    useless; popups saying "use loot boxes in moderation" and advertising
    limits won't have much effect and the definitions are so loose as to
    be easily argued in court. Even the "must show price in Euros" is
    toothless, since it doesn't actually enforce that in-game credits
    can't be used, just that the price /also/ has to be shown in
    real-money amounts. ("Buy this giraffe hat for 300 credits (4,67€)";
    meanwhile, "Credits sold in packs of 500 (7,78€ value)").

    But I suppose it is a step in the right direction; an indicator that
    - after decades of saying, "Oh don't worry, we can self-regulate when
    it comes to lootboxes" the words of the games industry are no longer
    being taken entirely at face value. It may put the brakes on some of
    the more extreme instances of these predatory mechanics... at least
    for a while, until they figure out a way to loophole the laws.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sat Jul 9 11:10:19 2022
    On 07/07/2022 16:55, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:20:46 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    Well as this is often a hot subject with 'gamers' I think this is
    interesting news. It seems Spain is introducing new legislation that
    effectively says, you can still have lootboxes in games but if you do
    then you need to have an age verification system in place. How this will
    impact games I'm not sure but my guess is just that if you're in Spain
    then lootboxes won't be available to anyone as companies won't want the
    hassle of age verification that will fulfil the requirement.

    https://igamingbusiness.com/spain-ban-loot-boxes-minors/

    Its largely falls into the 'something must be done, this is something'
    cover used by politicians the world over. It is largely theater. It
    isn't completely toothless, but even "documentary age verification" is
    fairly easily bypassed, especially when it fails to enforce any
    penalties for lying about your age (all penalties are afforded to the
    game publisher).

    The only other thing of note is that publishers must list the
    probability of obtaining various objects. But the rest is fairly
    useless; popups saying "use loot boxes in moderation" and advertising
    limits won't have much effect and the definitions are so loose as to
    be easily argued in court. Even the "must show price in Euros" is
    toothless, since it doesn't actually enforce that in-game credits
    can't be used, just that the price /also/ has to be shown in
    real-money amounts. ("Buy this giraffe hat for 300 credits (4,67€)"; meanwhile, "Credits sold in packs of 500 (7,78€ value)").

    But I suppose it is a step in the right direction; an indicator that
    - after decades of saying, "Oh don't worry, we can self-regulate when
    it comes to lootboxes" the words of the games industry are no longer
    being taken entirely at face value. It may put the brakes on some of
    the more extreme instances of these predatory mechanics... at least
    for a while, until they figure out a way to loophole the laws.


    I think it more than just theatre especially if whoever is behind this
    starts pushing it in the EU as the way forward.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 9 11:38:21 2022
    To add, a couple of things that annoy me about lootboxes is how some
    gamers themselves treat them. So there seems to be the false belief that
    if you don't like lootboxes you want them banned and also that the issue
    has nothing to do with the games companies it's about bad parenting. We
    accept age restrictions on other activities but somehow for lootboxes
    it's different and more importantly if someone's parents aren't the most responsible does that make their children fair game.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@21:1/5 to JAB on Sat Jul 9 11:13:26 2022
    On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 11:38:21 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    To add, a couple of things that annoy me about lootboxes is how some
    gamers themselves treat them. So there seems to be the false belief that
    if you don't like lootboxes you want them banned and also that the issue
    has nothing to do with the games companies it's about bad parenting. We >accept age restrictions on other activities but somehow for lootboxes
    it's different and more importantly if someone's parents aren't the most >responsible does that make their children fair game.

    /My/ main objection is how the inclusion of lootboxes has affected the
    amount of in-game content and gameplay. I have serious concerns about
    the predatory nature of the things too, but because I don't engage
    with them*, this aspect doesn't resonate with me as strongly. But
    things that /used/ to be included in games have now been stripped away
    to be sold through microtransactions or DLC, and the games have become increasingly grindy to justify these sales. The end effect is that
    games have become less enjoyable and I feel I'm getting less value for
    my money when I buy a game.

    Which is not to disregard or downplay the very disturbing way that
    publishers manipulate their customer base to become hooked on the
    dopamine rush created by buying/opening lootboxes (and not just
    children; adults are victimized almost as easily). It's all a very
    calculated attempt to make games as addicitive as possible - often
    utilizing psychologists to maximize the effects - disguised as
    harmless entertainment. I've no objection to incrased government
    scrutiny of this practice. I'm just not entirely sure that Spain's
    attempt is anything more than shallow cover that isn't intended to do
    much more than make the politicians look good.






    -------
    * largely because I suspect that were I to start getting into
    lootboxes, my personality type would be exactly the sort that would
    overdose on the damn things**, so in self defense I avoid the things
    entirely.

    ** I mean, who would suspect that the person with seventeen gajillion
    video games might not have the best self control? ;-)***

    *** footnotes to footnotes to footnotes! You can't stop me,
    muahahahaha!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sat Jul 9 09:43:14 2022
    On 7/9/2022 8:13 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 11:38:21 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    To add, a couple of things that annoy me about lootboxes is how some
    gamers themselves treat them. So there seems to be the false belief that
    if you don't like lootboxes you want them banned and also that the issue
    has nothing to do with the games companies it's about bad parenting. We
    accept age restrictions on other activities but somehow for lootboxes
    it's different and more importantly if someone's parents aren't the most
    responsible does that make their children fair game.

    /My/ main objection is how the inclusion of lootboxes has affected the
    amount of in-game content and gameplay. I have serious concerns about
    the predatory nature of the things too, but because I don't engage
    with them*, this aspect doesn't resonate with me as strongly. But
    things that /used/ to be included in games have now been stripped away
    to be sold through microtransactions or DLC, and the games have become increasingly grindy to justify these sales. The end effect is that
    games have become less enjoyable and I feel I'm getting less value for
    my money when I buy a game.

    Which is not to disregard or downplay the very disturbing way that
    publishers manipulate their customer base to become hooked on the
    dopamine rush created by buying/opening lootboxes (and not just
    children; adults are victimized almost as easily). It's all a very
    calculated attempt to make games as addicitive as possible - often
    utilizing psychologists to maximize the effects - disguised as
    harmless entertainment. I've no objection to incrased government
    scrutiny of this practice. I'm just not entirely sure that Spain's
    attempt is anything more than shallow cover that isn't intended to do
    much more than make the politicians look good.

    The problem with "weak" government responses to problems is usually
    because no one can agree on what the response should be. Unfortunately
    a large part of the reason for the disagreement is frequently because
    the people who are gaining money, and therefore power, use it to oppose
    being reined in.


    -------
    * largely because I suspect that were I to start getting into
    lootboxes, my personality type would be exactly the sort that would
    overdose on the damn things**, so in self defense I avoid the things entirely.

    ** I mean, who would suspect that the person with seventeen gajillion
    video games might not have the best self control? ;-)***

    *** footnotes to footnotes to footnotes! You can't stop me,
    muahahahaha!

    I see that you've found that footnotes are how you gain access to Usenet
    loot boxes.


    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)