Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)...
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
I'll bump this one up the play list (for the campaign), thanks! Along
with titanfall 2 :)
I still have my original retail Battlefront games. :O
Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 8:50:13 PM UTC-7, Ant wrote:
I still have my original retail Battlefront games. :O
Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
I have the Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2005) game on steam, never tried it.
I'm installing it now. Not the original one though.
The 2017 version kept telling me it was offline so I couldn't play >multiplayer this morning.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT), Justisaur
<just...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 8:50:13 PM UTC-7, Ant wrote:
I still have my original retail Battlefront games. :O
Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
I have the Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2005) game on steam, never tried it. >I'm installing it now. Not the original one though.I have a lot of fond memories of the original "Battlefront" games, but
I have to admit, I have a really hard time getting back into them. The visuals definitely play a part in that; while the LucasArts
"Battlefronts" were never /ugly/ games when they were new, neither
were their graphics particularly impressive, and they haven't aged
well.
But they fact that they are multiplayer-focused titles is a more
serious issue; multiplayer is only really fun with friends, and nobody
I knows plays this oldie anymore (and, at least last time I looked,
the servers were pretty empty anyway, so even playing with randos was
a challenge). Plus, I just don't find that sort of gameplay all that
engaging anymore; even in 2005 I was tiring of it, and nowadays
running around like headless chickens shooting other people to
increment the scoreboard seems incredibly uninteresting to me. The
game did feature a nominal single-player, but it was essentially
offline multiplayer against bots, so not much better.
Still, I do have some fond memories; in particular, the space maps
(where you fly space-fighters to engage and/or board enemy capital
ships) were always a favorite. I may not be able to rekindle the magic
that made the games so memorable back then, but that doesn't negate
the enjoyment I got from the games back in 2005.
TL;DR: unless you have a crew waiting to play the game with you, or
have an overwhelming love for really old multiplayer games, don't
bother with the original Battlefronts. They were good for their time,
but there are better alternatives today (although not necessarily the
newer Battlefronts)
The 2017 version kept telling me it was offline so I couldn't play >multiplayer this morning.
Ah, the joys of not ever owning or having control of the software you
paid for. It's such a pleasure to be a modern gamer, isn't it? ;-)
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:56:35 AM UTC-7, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT), Justisaur
<just...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 8:50:13 PM UTC-7, Ant wrote:
I still have my original retail Battlefront games. :O
Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017, EA)
I have the Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2005) game on steam, never tried it. >I'm installing it now. Not the original one though.I have a lot of fond memories of the original "Battlefront" games, but
I have to admit, I have a really hard time getting back into them. The visuals definitely play a part in that; while the LucasArts
"Battlefronts" were never /ugly/ games when they were new, neither
were their graphics particularly impressive, and they haven't aged
well.
But they fact that they are multiplayer-focused titles is a more
serious issue; multiplayer is only really fun with friends, and nobody
I knows plays this oldie anymore (and, at least last time I looked,
the servers were pretty empty anyway, so even playing with randos was
a challenge). Plus, I just don't find that sort of gameplay all that engaging anymore; even in 2005 I was tiring of it, and nowadays
running around like headless chickens shooting other people to
increment the scoreboard seems incredibly uninteresting to me. The
game did feature a nominal single-player, but it was essentially
offline multiplayer against bots, so not much better.
Still, I do have some fond memories; in particular, the space maps
(where you fly space-fighters to engage and/or board enemy capital
ships) were always a favorite. I may not be able to rekindle the magic
that made the games so memorable back then, but that doesn't negate
the enjoyment I got from the games back in 2005.
TL;DR: unless you have a crew waiting to play the game with you, or
have an overwhelming love for really old multiplayer games, don't
bother with the original Battlefronts. They were good for their time,
but there are better alternatives today (although not necessarily the
newer Battlefronts)
The 2017 version kept telling me it was offline so I couldn't play >multiplayer this morning.
Ah, the joys of not ever owning or having control of the software youI had read the multiplayer was active. I did find one server with a
paid for. It's such a pleasure to be a modern gamer, isn't it? ;-)
few people on it, but yeah the combat mostly consisted of me falling
off walkways and dying as they seemed to by slippery for some reason :(
I went through the tutorial and first 'campaign' mission, uninspired
is an understatement, mission objectives and 'story' were read like
the narrator was reading a shopping list.
The new one is far better. I played a bit more, I tried to get in a space battle, but not enough people there and gave up after 5 minutes in the
que. I played a bit more 'first thing available' but it's starting to get a bit repetitive. I need to try some more specific modes.
The server/connection issues continue as after that play I took a break
and tried to return and it kept telling me I was offline again. I also
found some in game achievements which it appears unlock some
weapons in multiplayer you have to be online to get and more than
half the campaign I played offline and didn't get the mission completed achievements as it didn't seem to be important at the time to be
connected.
Also Epic doesn't seem to remember that I've played it, and any time
I do I have to go down my now huge list of games to find it, and it
takes a couple minutes to load the full list. It's not my computer as steam >& gog don't have that issue.
Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> wrote:
Also Epic doesn't seem to remember that I've played it, and any timeUnfortunately, the Epic Game Store client is implemented as a bloated
I do I have to go down my now huge list of games to find it, and it
takes a couple minutes to load the full list. It's not my computer as steam >& gog don't have that issue.
app, so it's absurdly slow. Well, ok, so is the Steam client these days,
and GOG Galaxy too, but Valve and GOG actually care about their users.
You might want to make a shortcut for the game so you don't have to
launch it from the client. Click the ... next to the game, and after
waiting only a few seconds for it to render, a menu should appear with a "Create a shortcut" option.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 122:08:31 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,334,551 |