On 2023-08-12, Chris Schram <
chrispam1@me.com> wrote:
On 2023-08-12, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 12/08/2023 11:46, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
Am 12.08.23 um 12:41 schrieb Jörg Lorenz:
Am 12.08.23 um 12:26 schrieb Pancho:
Looking at previous postings, it seems about average "on topic" for
comp.os.linux.misc, it is 100% on topic for comp.sys.raspberry-pi.
I'm interested.
If you want to criticise, there is loads of other shit that we discuss >>>>> that isn't on topic.
Discussions with fake identities are futile.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Before and after Covid I have no intention to talk to masked and
anonymous people.
Well why don't you STFU then?
You have no way of knowing who here is using their real name, or even if
they have a real name. Many people have more than one name they commonly
use.
As for publishing a real email address, you must be bonkers. I have
enough spam as it is.
Just to add a data point to this more and more ridiculous off-topic meta discussion, for Usenet purpose only, email address in my From: header,
as well as in my .signature, is quite real and working. I cannot
remember the last time, if ever at all, I received spam email at that address. Lucky? Maybe.
And to add another data point: I get a few spam messages per day
at the real, live email address in my signature. Until recently,
I used my email service provider's spam filter to get rid of the
repeat offenders but switched to a home-grown filter program
after I got blasted with several per day from random-ish invalid
domain names. Having "spamtrap" in the name field seems to help.
--
Robert Riches
spamtrap42@jacob21819.net
(Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)