• Re: [OT]password no longer works Minor progress

    From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 7 20:25:22 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:50:33 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 07/12/2021 20:55, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-07, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 07/12/2021 15:48, Kelly Phillips wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:59:51 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    I was *NOT* dismissed from the Royal Navy - for *ANY* reason.

    Hard to believe you're still on active duty after all these years. I
    guess the stories of insurance sales scams and financial management
    scams, not to mention the stories of boating on sewage canals, were all >>>> a ruse to hide the fact that you're still a member of the RN.

    Or, it could be that you're simply being dishonest again.

    The truth WILL out - always. :-D

    Oh, it's out. That cake is fully baked.


    I didn't realise that English isn't your first language.

    Sorry about that.

    What an odd thing to say given that you've been asking the same
    questions over and over, and getting the responses in English, for
    years.

    The Kelly Phillips character has no understanding of the word "dismissed".

    To dismiss:
    "1. To end the employment or service of".

    What do you call being asked to "retire - or else" long before
    you were due to official retirement?
    Seems KP speaks better English than you do.
    Why are you STILL posting about your personal vices on a Mac
    group? Do you feel no shame?
    OT up.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 8 08:51:13 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:19:04 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 00:59, Wolffan - A known Usenet *USER* claimed

    I'm not the vile serial homosexual sexual harasser.

    We know.

    Nor me.

    Sounds like a pretty convincing argument.
    NOT!!!!!

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 8 13:38:16 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
    David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:

    You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
    every bit as described.

    Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D

    Ah, the "I'm *LYING*" smiley.
    Fair enough. "British humour" I suppose.

    Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)

    That's easy. Margaret Thatcher ordered the Royal Navy
    eliminate *ALL* the "bad guys", the personnel that had *PROVEN*
    "inappropriate behavior". 15% were dismissed. You were one of them. Do
    you deny that? That you were one of the "chosen"?


    David*GOOD GUY*!

    You're the only one saying it, and you "forgot" the smiley.
    Heavy drinking can cause amnesia.

    Is snit sharing his jenkem recipe with you? You're just as
    dillusonal as he is.

    YOU are the one full of shit!

    As snit says, you're proving how insecure you are. Instead of
    answering the question you chose to attack others.

    <snip use of real names, inappropriate on Usenet>

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 14:53:11 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:14:51 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 18:47, Kelly Phillips wrote:
    On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
    David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:

    You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
    every bit as described.

    Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D

    Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)

    Careful with those challenges.

    *The challenge stands*!

    I answered a couple of days ago. With *PROOF*. Write it down
    on a piece of paper so when you wake up tomorrow, "slate clean" you'll
    remember to read the post before hitting the bottle.
    You're welcome.
    PS You "forgot" the OT AGAIN. Your personal history is OT in a
    Mac group.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 15:03:58 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:16:16 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 20:25, Snit wrote:

    I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported >> accusations about him. If you can show otherwise I would be curious to see it.

    Well, he DID ask the website owner to put a page up for him,
    and the website owner complied. He then asked BD to point out any
    inaccuracies. BD spotted one #FAKE_NYM he had never used(we only have
    his word for that though) and it was removed. All the other #FAKE_NYMS
    were "ratified" by BD himself.
    EVERY SINGLE ONE has BD's FULL SUPPORT.
    I can understand that your known drug abuse might make
    interpreting text a tad difficult, but you could try harder.
    Better still, get a real job. If you work you wont have time
    to make excuses for a proven *LIAR*, *STALKER*and *SLIMER*.


    Me too!

    You too what? Are they handing out free Royal Navy surplus
    dildos?
    I'll pass on that.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 15:07:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:24:30 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:

    <re-the documentary below>


    Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
    there's no support.

    Which ones?

    If you can't remember due to your abuse of alcohol, don't ask.
    "Investigate".

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blau@21:1/5 to Shadow on Sat Dec 11 18:13:10 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote in
    news:pdp9rg97kndu8tc3au3qclfn2m9mbasqnt@4ax.com:

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:16:16 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:

    On 08/12/2021 20:25, Snit wrote:

    I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with
    unsupported accusations about him. If you can show otherwise I
    would be curious to see it.

    Well, he DID ask the website owner to put a page up for him,
    and the website owner complied. He then asked BD to point out any inaccuracies. BD spotted one #FAKE_NYM he had never used(we only
    have his word for that though) and it was removed. All the other
    #FAKE_NYMS were "ratified" by BD himself.
    EVERY SINGLE ONE has BD's FULL SUPPORT.
    I can understand that your known drug abuse might make
    interpreting text a tad difficult, but you could try harder.
    Better still, get a real job. If you work you wont have time
    to make excuses for a proven *LIAR*, *STALKER*and *SLIMER*.


    Me too!

    You too what? Are they handing out free Royal Navy surplus
    dildos?
    I'll pass on that.

    Snit already has more dildos and rubber toys than he can use.
    So does his wife.
    And so does a certain local reverend and school board member because
    for some odd reason snit cannot remember his own address when
    ordering his sex toys online.
    I'll bet the town of Prescott is a buzz with gossip regarding the
    Glasser family.
    Hey snit, are you having fun yet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 21:44:21 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    *On 11/12/2021 17:53, Shadow *LIED* - as always.

    So sad. :-(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 19:28:30 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut@21:1/5 to Shadow on Sat Dec 11 22:31:59 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    --
    Helmut
    "If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to Achterberg"@localonly.com on Sat Dec 11 19:40:29 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:59 GMT, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s



    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    No, snit does drugs. BD drinks.
    HTH
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Achterberg"@localonly.com on Sat Dec 11 22:41:50 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?


    One of us is, the other isn’t.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
    cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
    somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut@21:1/5 to Shadow on Sat Dec 11 22:45:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:59 GMT, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s



    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    No, snit does drugs. BD drinks.
    HTH
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    Thanks.
    I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
    xposts.
    Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.


    --
    Helmut
    "If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Sat Dec 11 22:54:37 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 11/12/2021 22:41, Snit wrote:
    Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?


    One of us is, the other isn’t.

    :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 22:54:06 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 11/12/2021 22:40, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD drinks.

    BD does *NOT* drink. He stopped on 21 March 2018

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Helmut Achterberg on Sat Dec 11 23:04:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:

    I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
    xposts.
    Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.


    You are welcome here, Helmut :-)

    Shadow is an out-and-out liar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Sat Dec 11 23:15:26 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:

    I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
    xposts.
    Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.


    You are welcome here, Helmut :-)

    Thank you.

    Shadow is an out-and-out liar.

    I am not in a position to judge anyone nor do I intend to.
    I'm a big proponent of the glass house and rocks theory.
    Let the cards fall where they may.

    Thank you for the kind welcome.



    --
    Helmut
    "If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 21:01:48 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:54:37 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Here's the simple question:

    Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA
    []'s

    :-D

    You "forgot" to reply and ridiculed snit.
    Think that's funny?
    Your "partner" will probably take more narcotics to keep his
    anxiety in check. And you claim he's your "friend"?
    You obviously have no friends.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 11 21:05:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 23:04:09 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    You are welcome here, Helmut.

    .... cue the very personal non-heterosexual questions.
    BD never changes ...

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Sat Dec 11 23:48:14 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 11/12/2021 23:15, Helmut Achterberg wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:

    I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
    xposts.
    Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.


    You are welcome here, Helmut :-)

    Thank you.

    Shadow is an out-and-out liar.

    I am not in a position to judge anyone nor do I intend to.
    I'm a big proponent of the glass house and rocks theory.
    Let the cards fall where they may.

    Thank you for the kind welcome.

    YW :-)

    Mike Easter is a proponent of Linux. With his help and advice, I've
    recently set up Linux Mint on my old 24 inch Apple iMac.

    At present, my @ and " keys are reversed. Could you advise me how to
    swop them around?

    Your language settings might be mixed up between US English and UK
    English. That is the most common reason for this error.



    --
    Helmut
    "If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Achterberg"@localonly.com on Sun Dec 12 14:43:07 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to Carroll"@noSPAM.none on Sun Dec 12 13:30:51 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    I've never seen snit ask for personal, sensitive information
    on ACW. I've seen him break promises, crack commercial software,
    viciously attack anyone that disagrees with him, *LIE* a lot, TROLL
    even more and "pretend" to have severe cognitive issues with any text
    longer than a paragraph.
    Maybe he's not pretending. He has a severe problem with drug
    abuse. It's why he's on welfare.
    I killfile snit(and his automated nonsense-bot) though, so I
    only know what he posts if someone replies.

    They are both "bad guys".
    HTH
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Sun Dec 12 23:04:03 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    That really is NOT funny.

    Tell the TRUTH - I do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 12 23:08:24 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 12 20:49:57 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:04:03 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    That really is NOT funny.

    The truth rarely is. He just said you are both "bad guys", and
    you both *LIE* all the time. I gave a more complete description.


    Tell the TRUTH - I do.

    See?

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 12 20:45:41 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve
    Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    Want to take a vote on that?

    ------------------------

    Still working on that "simple question"?
    Must be hard. 81 #FAKE_NYMS on your "special page" and your alcohol-pickled brain can't remember where you used each one.
    But we can.
    LOL

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s

    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 00:11:20 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:04:03 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp5v53$t30$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    That really is NOT funny.

    Tell the TRUTH - I do.

    Another plea for attention from Carroll.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 00:11:45 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kelly Phillips@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 12 19:16:34 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
    over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to Kelly Phillips on Mon Dec 13 02:32:24 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
    over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.


    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Mon Dec 13 11:01:31 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
    he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 13 08:42:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:01:31 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow wrote:

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>> is not true!)

    Not my problem you have memory issues. It would be impolite to
    filth up a Mac forum with your email exchange with Diesel, but he
    could post a link to a zipped version. He has done so before.
    Your attempts to blackmail him into breaking into a private
    server to steal personal data are quite clear, and rather nauseating.

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    As if snit puts his butt-hole on the line because he actually
    likes BD. LOL.
    BD has enough on snit to put him in jail for a long time.

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail....

    ....WELL. You don't do it well.

    It hasn't worked out for you yet, but I'll give you this: You
    never stop trying. Enviable, considering how much you drink.
    What a pity you don't use all that energy to help people.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 15:14:37 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 14:18:05 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Mon Dec 13 15:13:29 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.

    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
    over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
    happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.

    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
    using sock puppets. Curious.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Mon Dec 13 15:44:18 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:04:03 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5v53$t30$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    That really is NOT funny.

    Tell the TRUTH - I do.

    Another plea for attention from Carroll.

    Actually I was being really kind by soft pedaling it like it did there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 15:43:32 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-12, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    That really is NOT funny.

    You see it as the obvious joke I intended, yet, you labeled it a "LIE".

    Tell the TRUTH - I do.

    Clearly not.

    That aspect aside, if you consider Snit to be a "good" guy who is
    "honest and honorable" (who is not a phony, who is not a drama queen of
    a narcissistic, hypocritical, lying troll... on his best day), why would
    you object here?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Mon Dec 13 15:49:36 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

    Hi Snit!

    As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
    folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Mon Dec 13 15:51:40 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 16:04:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 13 13:10:52 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:49:36 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    Hi Snit!

    That's enough flirting! This is Usenet, not the Royal navy,

    As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
    folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

    I once asked you to show me an example of you helping people.
    You gave two MSG_IDs.
    In one you suggested he "Google it", and in another you copy
    and pasted someone else's solution, but "forgot" to cite the source
    and pretended it was your own work.

    So ... enough *LIES*.

    I'm curious, how many names on the list so far?
    Oh, you "forgot". It was TWO DAYS AGO, slate clean?
    I'll post the question again:

    Here's the simple question, with the MSG_ID in case you "lost"
    it:
    Message-ID: <n49arg5eap8n82ca9kagk45rb8plpo56e0@4ax.com>

    // Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
    can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
    TIA

    //
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 16:49:52 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

    Hi Snit!

    As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
    folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

    This guy might need your 'help' (aside from talent and money,
    he's not so different than Glasser):

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G01RuErIUsc>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 13 13:23:37 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:51:40 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    You didn't?

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU!

    Oh, another classic BD *LIE*.

    Blackmail only works if you know who the victim is. You suck
    at "investigating". I very much doubt you "frightened" anyone.
    But thanks for confirming you DID attempt blackmail and that
    it failed.
    PS Your threat to kill me failed to "frighten" me too. You
    have no idea who I am. "Failure"is kind of your M.O.

    QUOTE from YESTERDAY
    //Shadow .... "You are a dead man walking".//

    PS Please put up an OT when posting to completely OT groups.
    People can killfile on [OT] and won't need to add your 101 #FAKE_NYMS
    to their filters. You'll be "helping" people.
    TIA

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Mon Dec 13 17:39:05 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
    over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
    happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.

    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to using sock puppets. Curious.

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
    names.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    It's a puzzle!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Mon Dec 13 17:43:37 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 16:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    Have I not already apologised for so doing, way back?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 17:43:24 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>
    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
    using sock puppets. Curious.

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    That's a ridiculous statement.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the names.

    I already know the answer.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    Of course they have, you point to them all the time in some forum or
    other that you've been banned from.

    It's a puzzle!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 17:53:37 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 16:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with >>>> me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    Have I not already apologised for so doing, way back?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Mon Dec 13 16:12:41 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:43:37 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    You intended harm. Nobody is surprised.

    Have I not already apologised for so doing, way back?

    Maybe. You sometimes apologize for your criminal behavior and
    carry on doing it.
    BD only changes for the worse.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Mon Dec 13 16:08:39 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:39:05 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    Pseudo means "false or fake". Your use of a double negative
    reveals all. You sentence says "I have NEVER used a nym". Obviously a
    *LIE*. You have used 101 #FAKE_NYMS. (81 if you don't include slight
    spelling variations deliberately made to avoid killfiles).
    So we can only assume they are all correct.
    You have no "list" of #FAKE_NYMs you've never used.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the >names.

    From all the places you STALK.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    No, a lot are from all the private forums you were *BANNED*
    from, and tried to open a new account with another #FAKE_NYM.

    It's a puzzle!

    Only to a drunk.
    HTH

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 13 20:05:48 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    Reference:-

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudonym

    *There is no such thing as a FAKE pseudonym*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Mon Dec 13 21:05:24 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
    perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
    pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
    cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
    no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious
    issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be
    using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
    your own on his behalf.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I've done nothing to be sorry for.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.

    LOL!

    I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
    help 'teach you a lesson'

    Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)

    . had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
    I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
    seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many
    years ago.

    I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely
    accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify
    this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
    Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop
    pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
    nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Mon Dec 13 20:25:30 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
    friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
    you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 01:49:34 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.
    He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged
    and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
    friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
    you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 01:52:13 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
    wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>
    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
    using sock puppets. Curious.

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the names.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    It's a puzzle!

    Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does: looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even though he does FAR worse.

    He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 01:59:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:49:36 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q2g$1go$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

    Hi Snit!

    As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
    folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

    Yes, of course. As do I.

    It is sorta funny, and sad, how those who think in terms of harming others cannot imagine others not being like them.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 01:58:25 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised) blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in my life.


    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 12:20:31 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 14/12/2021 01:58, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
    blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in my life.

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 12:18:28 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 14/12/2021 01:52, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> >>>>> wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>>
    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to >>> using sock puppets. Curious.

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
    names.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    It's a puzzle!

    Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
    looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even though he does FAR worse.

    He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.

    I appreciate you warning me.

    Thanks. πŸ™‚

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 12:17:23 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 14/12/2021 01:49, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions. He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.

    That really saddens me. :-(

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
    friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
    you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.

    That's the kind of behaviour engaged in by Dustin Cook.
    Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.

    Stay safe, Snit. πŸ’•

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 14 09:22:35 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:25:30 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    That nym is not on my list. 102 #FAKE_NYMS. Why did you make a
    new one?

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly,

    Wrongly (as usual).

    is that you are well aware that Snit has had to deal with medical >conditions....

    Other than hypochondria, sociopathy and drug abuse, I see no
    others in his medical report
    I don't think "laziness" counts as a medical condition.
    None of his "medical conditions" justify demanding welfare
    handouts and sitting at home trolling newsgroups and snorting coke.

    I can think of hundreds of jobs for snit, none of which are
    impeded by his hatred of fellow humans or his need to gossip about
    "all the latest diseases" he self-diagnosed himself with.

    PS Why are you posting this OT crap to csmm? Hoping snit will
    unleash his bot there and wreck the group?

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Tue Dec 14 09:28:28 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:05:48 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    *There is no such thing as a FAKE pseudonym*

    What I said. Two negatives cancel each other out. The phrase
    becomes "There is no such thing as a nym".
    Obviously a *LIE*. You have 102 #FAKE_NYMS

    Again, why are you cross-posting OT to a Mac group?
    Did they *BAN* you with their killfiles?

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    101 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to Carroll"@noSPAM.none on Tue Dec 14 09:34:15 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:05:24 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
    perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
    pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's >something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
    cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
    no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious
    issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be >using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
    your own on his behalf.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I've done nothing to be sorry for.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.

    LOL!

    I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
    help 'teach you a lesson'

    Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)

    . had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
    I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
    seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many >years ago.

    I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely
    accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify
    this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
    Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real >posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop >pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
    nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.

    While I agree with everything you wrote, could you please
    change the subject line?
    BD (and from the replies) snit are using it to feed the bots.
    Google bots are quite intelligent, but a mass of posts claiming my
    descriptions of BD and snit are not 100% accurate might stain my
    pristine reputation.
    TIA

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 12:34:20 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 14/12/2021 01:59, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:49:36 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q2g$1go$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
    deranged. :-(

    Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)

    Hi Snit!

    As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
    folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.

    Yes, of course. As do I.

    It is sorta funny, and sad, how those who think in terms of harming others cannot imagine others not being like them.

    You are correct. What goes around, comes around.

    I've never seen this before .....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOrnUquxtwA

    The blonde is/was lovely (IMO)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 14 14:45:41 2021
    On 14/12/2021 12:22, Shadow declared:
    I see no
    others in his medical report

    Do share, so that we may all see what has been written about Snit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 17:42:51 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
    a myriad of ways.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.

    Calling out your lies is a perfectly acceptable 'action'.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
    friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
    you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and more.

    And you'll 'prove' this 'any minute now' <eyeroll>.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Tue Dec 14 17:44:47 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-14, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
    claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
    me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    Again Carroll attacks others

    Reality isn't an 'attack' and DB's memory issues are well known.

    (snip same ol' tired lies by an overmedicated loon)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 17:46:33 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-14, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    I was but it's silly to pretend your memory isn't an issue. It happens
    as we age <shrug>. Snit is just looking to play the 'victim' card again.
    Who *hasn't* seen this?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Tue Dec 14 17:48:35 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-14, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 14/12/2021 01:52, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
    <dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* -

    Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.

    it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
    is not true!)

    Two things:
    1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.

    2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?

    Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.

    Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to >>>> using sock puppets. Curious.

    I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.

    What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the >>> names.

    Many have NOT been used on Usenet.

    It's a puzzle!

    Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
    looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even
    though he does FAR worse.

    Yet, you're never able to show 'proof' of these "FAR worse" things.

    He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.

    I appreciate you warning me.

    Thanks. πŸ™‚

    LOL! It's obvious that even you know he's full of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Shadow on Tue Dec 14 17:49:45 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-14, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
    On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:05:24 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
    perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
    pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's >>something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
    cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
    no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious >>issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in >>> a myriad of ways.

    If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be >>using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
    your own on his behalf.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I've done nothing to be sorry for.

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.

    LOL!

    I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
    help 'teach you a lesson'

    Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)

    . had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
    I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
    seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many >>years ago.

    I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely >>accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify >>this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
    Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real >>posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop >>pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
    nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.

    While I agree with everything you wrote, could you please
    change the subject line?

    Sorry, I'll try to remember next time.

    BD (and from the replies) snit are using it to feed the bots.
    Google bots are quite intelligent, but a mass of posts claiming my descriptions of BD and snit are not 100% accurate might stain my
    pristine reputation.
    TIA

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Wed Dec 15 01:36:44 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 14, 2021 at 5:20:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spa26f$227$3@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 14/12/2021 01:58, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
    On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
    <"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

    On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

    For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)

    BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>
    Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>>> is not true!)

    When do you get to blackmailing me?

    I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.

    Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with >>>> me?

    (cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)

    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
    blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked >> either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a >> visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in
    my life.

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Wed Dec 15 01:37:53 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 14, 2021 at 5:17:23 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spa20k$227$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 14/12/2021 01:49, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    [....]
    I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.

    Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)

    You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.

    You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)

    It's not like you to be stupid about such things.

    First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
    comparisons between you two.

    Yes. It was a joke.

    My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
    Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
    most of us do not have to deal.

    In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in >>> a myriad of ways.

    Are you now sorry for having done so?

    I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions. >> He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged >> and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he >> accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.

    That really saddens me. :-(

    I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.

    No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.

    I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
    friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
    you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.

    What made you desist from so doing?

    Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to >> watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and
    more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.

    That's the kind of behaviour engaged in by Dustin Cook.

    There is a reason the two of them get along.

    Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.

    Sadly in the US the police do not take this stuff that seriously.


    Stay safe, Snit. πŸ’•


    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Wed Dec 15 16:29:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Wed Dec 15 16:37:41 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.

    Sadly in the US the police do not take this stuff that seriously.

    Thanks to 'politics' the police no longer respond to many things they
    once did but they're certainly not going to prioritize usenet spats over
    the many other crimes they're now ignoring (because they know
    prosecutors won't prosecute anyway). People who have committed murder
    have been let out of prison, do you really think 'the law' cares about
    your delusional crap that *you* asked for with your bizarre behavior?
    Did you empty your medicine cabinet before you wrote this? ;) Look
    around, police are short-staffed everywhere. But it's worse than that:
    Who, in their right mind, would want to be a policeman nowadays?!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Wed Dec 15 20:04:49 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened.

    So whatever you're "told" by someone you call a "friend" is the end all,
    be all? Screw what many others have "told" about Snit? Screw the
    evidence you keep refusing to look at that proves how ridiculously
    dishonest he is? Care to explain why you should be seen as a reasonable
    person as you hold such a goofy position?

    You appear to be denying it.

    I am denying it and I'm doing so based on the fact that it never
    happened, which is why Snit can't prove it did. He can drum up a
    'client' who can falsely claim it did, he can even drum up phony emails
    that you won't be able to verify have *anything* to do with me, what he
    can't do is show actual evidence because there isn't any. Why do you
    think he continually points to the same post and has for the over 15
    years? That's not an accident, it's all he has and he has to try an'
    spin it to make it appear to back his BS... but it doesn't. Not even
    close.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?

    I have no idea but unless you can produce evidence of it, it's pointless
    to bring it up.

    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    No visit ever happened. You're being made a fool of by Snit, just like
    so many on his 'list' have been before they finally got tired of it. Ask
    Snit about his 'friend' Slimer (Silver Slimer), or ask him about DFS.
    Today, he calls them out for being "racists" (and perhaps they actually
    are) but he never said a peep when they hadn't yet figured him out. He's
    a huge phony who uses people (maybe that's why you get along with him?).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Wed Dec 15 19:39:33 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.
    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?
    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Wed Dec 15 20:08:31 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.


    --
    rick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Rick on Wed Dec 15 20:45:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.

    No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
    and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to 'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
    reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
    they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
    *alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill in
    the blank> even *is* the correct person.

    The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
    of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
    copy of the report. This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
    guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much
    about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
    on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
    just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
    spot for him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Wed Dec 15 21:27:41 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.

    No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
    and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to 'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
    reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
    they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
    *alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill in
    the blank> even *is* the correct person.

    The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
    of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
    copy of the report. This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
    guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
    on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
    just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
    spot for him.

    FWIW, I've never seen the police report written after PC536 (*******)
    visited me on 07 November 2012 to investigate a complaint made about me
    by Aardvark.

    If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind him
    into dust.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Wed Dec 15 21:44:50 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 15/12/2021 20:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened.

    So whatever you're "told" by someone you call a "friend" is the end all,
    be all? Screw what many others have "told" about Snit? Screw the
    evidence you keep refusing to look at that proves how ridiculously
    dishonest he is? Care to explain why you should be seen as a reasonable person as you hold such a goofy position?

    What I 'see' and 'hear' on Usenet is often rubbish.

    What I see and hear on Messenger and Skype, and what I read in email
    messages, tends to be more believable.

    You have read an honest summary of my career in LinkedIn. What I tell
    you is the truth.

    All I know about you is that you feel a bit of a failure. I'm sorry
    about that, but lots of musicians trip over drugs and booze during their career.

    You appear to be denying it.

    I am denying it and I'm doing so based on the fact that it never
    happened, which is why Snit can't prove it did. He can drum up a
    'client' who can falsely claim it did, he can even drum up phony emails
    that you won't be able to verify have *anything* to do with me, what he
    can't do is show actual evidence because there isn't any. Why do you
    think he continually points to the same post and has for the over 15
    years? That's not an accident, it's all he has and he has to try an'
    spin it to make it appear to back his BS... but it doesn't. Not even
    close.

    I've not looked at any post. I simply asked him face-to-face.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?

    I have no idea but unless you can produce evidence of it, it's pointless
    to bring it up.

    This is Aardvark and his "little children":- https://ibb.co/F08G18Z

    I supplied the beer he's drinking!

    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    No visit ever happened. You're being made a fool of by Snit, just like
    so many on his 'list' have been before they finally got tired of it. Ask
    Snit about his 'friend' Slimer (Silver Slimer), or ask him about DFS.
    Today, he calls them out for being "racists" (and perhaps they actually
    are) but he never said a peep when they hadn't yet figured him out. He's
    a huge phony who uses people (maybe that's why you get along with him?).

    I've never USED anyone.

    Give me a call and we'll discuss matters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Apd@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Thu Dec 16 00:02:22 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    "David Brooks" wrote:
    [nyms]
    'David Brooks' [...]

    =

    NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
    used.

    Your post I now reply to is using the above nym, right here. The
    evidence (MID) is in my "References" header.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Apd on Thu Dec 16 11:00:43 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 16/12/2021 00:02, Apd wrote:
    "David Brooks" wrote:
    [nyms]
    'David Brooks' [...]

    =

    NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
    used.

    Your post I now reply to is using the above nym, right here. The
    evidence (MID) is in my "References" header.

    Agreed. πŸ™‚

    Apart from my very obvious 'I'm not trying to hide' nyms, can you
    identify from whence the other nyms were copied?

    (They were not all from Usenet posts!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Thu Dec 16 13:37:06 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 15/12/2021 20:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap >>>> so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened.

    So whatever you're "told" by someone you call a "friend" is the end all,
    be all? Screw what many others have "told" about Snit? Screw the
    evidence you keep refusing to look at that proves how ridiculously
    dishonest he is? Care to explain why you should be seen as a reasonable
    person as you hold such a goofy position?

    What I 'see' and 'hear' on Usenet is often rubbish.

    Irrelevant. How you assess it is what's relevant.

    What I see and hear on Messenger and Skype, and what I read in email messages, tends to be more believable.

    That's absurd, too, as shown by Snit's previous Skype-capades.

    You have read an honest summary of my career in LinkedIn. What I tell
    you is the truth.

    Your career is irrelevant to how you're acting online.

    All I know about you is that you feel a bit of a failure.

    So you "know" how I "feel"? Now let's see, who else talks about the
    'feelings' of "others" as if he 'knows' what they are? I know it'll come
    to me...

    I'm sorry
    about that, but lots of musicians trip over drugs and booze during their career.

    You should be sorry for trying to pretend you're smarter than people
    you obviously aren't smart enough to fool with your idiocy.

    You appear to be denying it.

    I am denying it and I'm doing so based on the fact that it never
    happened, which is why Snit can't prove it did. He can drum up a
    'client' who can falsely claim it did, he can even drum up phony emails
    that you won't be able to verify have *anything* to do with me, what he
    can't do is show actual evidence because there isn't any. Why do you
    think he continually points to the same post and has for the over 15
    years? That's not an accident, it's all he has and he has to try an'
    spin it to make it appear to back his BS... but it doesn't. Not even
    close.

    I've not looked at any post. I simply asked him face-to-face.

    Posts are also irrelevant here, the police report is the only thing that
    would settle the matter of Glasser's lies on this.

    Stop blowing smoke, fool, it's not working.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Thu Dec 16 13:29:51 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.

    No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
    and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
    'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
    reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
    statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
    they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
    *alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill in
    the blank> even *is* the correct person.

    The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
    of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
    copy of the report. This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
    guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much
    about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
    on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
    just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
    spot for him.

    FWIW, I've never seen the police report written after PC536 (*******)
    visited me on 07 November 2012 to investigate a complaint made about me
    by Aardvark.

    So you got the point! Now ask Snit to produce, when he can't, you'll
    have a good reason to believe that he did what you keep claiming he's
    never done to you.

    If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind him
    into dust.

    I'm not a doctor, neither are you! As to grinding, if my calling out his
    lies is a problem for him, as his 'friend', why aren't you encouraging
    him away from such behavior?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Thu Dec 16 21:16:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.

    He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various
    Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?
    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know, contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snit@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Thu Dec 16 21:26:41 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Dec 15, 2021 at 2:27:41 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdmkd$jk6$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.

    No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
    and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
    'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
    reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
    statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
    they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
    *alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill inthe
    blank> even *is* the correct person.

    The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
    of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
    copy of the report.

    You can do this as well as I can. Go fish.

    Oh, and not all interactions with the police go into reports. Add to that we
    do not even know Carroll's real name. Sometimes he says it is Steven Petruzzellis, sometimes Steve Carroll, and I think he has used other names.

    Finally, you cannot just get any report you want... you need a reason. Or at least I think so.

    This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
    guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much
    about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
    on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
    just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
    spot for him.

    FWIW, I've never seen the police report written after PC536 (*******)
    visited me on 07 November 2012 to investigate a complaint made about me
    by Aardvark.

    If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind him
    into dust.

    The fact Gremlin feels the need to defend Carroll the way he does suggests he knows more to the story about the police visit to Carroll than he is letting on.

    --
    Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

    They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo Dreamer@21:1/5 to Snit on Thu Dec 16 21:29:48 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:t0OuJ.157326$1d1.98665@fx99.iad:

    On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes
    this crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you
    writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it.

    He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into
    various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what
    the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even
    admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had
    several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of
    my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other times a
    threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy
    Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling
    them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not
    figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes
    said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they
    told me about Aardvark?
    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know,
    contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.


    Notice how snit's story keeps changing and evolving?
    Nobody believes a word you write, snit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Thu Dec 16 21:30:05 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-16, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.

    He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
    times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?
    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know, contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.


    Me: "He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft spot for
    him."

    DB: "If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind
    him into dust."

    Hint: What you're doing hasn't worked.

    You really should stop now because DB will eventually have no choice but
    to flatly admit he knows you're lying, just like many on your 'list'.
    He's admtting it now but trying to be as gentle as he can. Why force
    him? Why do you always do that to people? What do you get out of it? Do
    you feel you deserve it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to Snit on Thu Dec 16 22:00:08 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-16, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Dec 15, 2021 at 2:27:41 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <spdmkd$jk6$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
    David Brooks wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
    him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
    crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
    denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
    think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
    when they paid you a visit?

    Snit told you?
    Well, that's a different story altogether.
    We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
    You can take that to the bank.

    P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
    P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
    yourself because snit is a pathological liar.

    No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
    and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
    'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
    reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
    statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute, >>> they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
    *alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill inthe >>> blank> even *is* the correct person.

    The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
    of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a >>> copy of the report.

    You can do this as well as I can. Go fish.

    Oh, and not all interactions with the police go into reports.

    If they come to your house based on statements given by someone with a
    claim of 'harassment' they definitely have a report, that's *how* they
    knew where to go, who to contact. So what did this 'client' give as the
    address for the police to go to and who, exactly, were they supposed to contact?

    Hint: DB has been through this process, he is now officially on your
    "other" list, the one containing all those you view as 'stupid as you
    need them to be'.

    Add to that we do not even know Carroll's real name. Sometimes he says
    it is Steven Petruzzellis, sometimes Steve Carroll, and I think he has
    used other names.

    You shouldn't "think" so much, Snit ;)

    Finally, you cannot just get any report you want... you need a reason. Or at least I think so.

    Uh... Einstein, how did the police know where to go if you don't know my
    name (which means you have no address, either)? See your problem with
    your goofy belief that people are as stupid as you need them to be YET?

    But let's say they went to the wrong house, it doesn't matter, there
    will be a report and your 'client', the *alleged* 'victim' here, can get
    a copy of the one he/she legally attested to and the name of the party
    who is *alleged* to be the 'harasser' will appear on it. You're like a
    five year old who keeps trying every stupid thing they can to be
    believed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 20:54:05 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:40:46 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:


    David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018

    Did you *LIE* when you said that or did you *LIE* when you
    said you still drank at church? Or is this "David Brooks" someone
    else?
    Can't have it both ways.

    <slight snip of STALKING>

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Snit on Thu Dec 16 23:47:07 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 16/12/2021 21:16, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
    so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.

    He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
    times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.

    I have no reason at all not to believe what you have told me. I think we
    should all concentrate on the now, and the future, and not dwell in the
    past.

    When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
    about Aardvark?
    What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?

    Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know, contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.

    That's really good to hear! πŸ€™ (thumbs up!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 20:41:40 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:35:40 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 15/12/2021 02:11, LegionX wrote:
    David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:

    There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities.

    David, we did write that MIDs were provided where necessary. What
    exactly do you mean by nefarious? Be very specific in what you're
    claiming if you'd like us to provide a reasonable answer for
    you.

    'BoaterDave', 'BoaterDaveTJ', '~BD~', 'BD1', 'BD2', 'Beady', 'Imbeady2', >'David B', 'David B.', 'DavidB', 'David_B', 'David DewGud', 'DavidDewgud
    ', 'BDonTJ', 'davidontj@gmail.com', 'LovelyLady', 'CommanderB', >'Commander_B', 'Angela Bennett', 'Byker', 'bufordTjustice', 'DonOldham', >'Tony Smith', 'MP.TonySmith', 'Tinkerer', 'Davoud1945', 'Brawdy14', >'HunterBD', 'HunterDB', 'Hunter88', 'Steve Carroll', 'I.Mackie', 'GA11', >'Marley', 'SaabOwner', 'Owner', 'C.A.Strate', 'Derek Feldman', 'A.
    Student', 'David in Devon', 'Dudley Brooks', 'Mrs Parrot', 'David G.
    Brooks', 'Russell Newbery', 'David B 1466', 'DGB', 'David', 'Anonymous', >'Christine Grist', 'Big Brother', 'PSA', 'davidbrooks_5408', 'Sir Topham >Hatt', 'Jack', 'Jon Botting', 'Jonathanbotting', 'John <Doh>', 'Sidney >Carton', 'Mr On!on', 'BD', 'Strgzr', 'rsoul' forgery, >'David_B@reinstall.T'bird', 'JetProvost' {in Mac forum}, 'asinrutee',
    'Jon', 'David Brooks', 'DigbyDB', 'John Doe', 'P C Butts', 'Alli Cat', >'David.Brooks', '111MS' , 'Tinkerer2', 'Dbd', 'David', 'Don Kwicksote', >'PitometerLog', 'Dave', 'BDBHeather', 'David B. Linux' , 'John Smith',
    'Joe' [<β€”83]

    NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been used.

    Are you saying that you've NEVER used ANY of those #FAKE_NYMS?
    That we have your "word" for that?
    I asked you to compile a list of those you had NEVER USED.
    Yes, I know, AGES ago(yesterday), you probably "forgot".
    Maybe try without drinking next time?

    PS Maybe you don't understand what a "nym" is. It's a name you
    want to be known as. Usenet is anonymous by design, so people should
    never use real names/email addresses.
    For example, I go by "sh@dow". You can change your nym every
    couple of years, but never use an old one again. If you do, then it
    becomes a #FAKE_NYM.
    There is NO REASON why anyone would want people to think he's
    someone else, unless he's a "bad guy" involved in criminal activity.
    HTH

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s

    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Dec 17 00:10:59 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-16, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 16/12/2021 21:16, Snit wrote:
    On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
    <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

    On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snip)

    Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.

    Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.

    Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap >>>> so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.

    Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it. >>
    He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various
    Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think >> about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the >> clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he >> was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
    times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy >> Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that
    and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. >> This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and >> sometimes he does not know.

    I have no reason at all not to believe what you have told me. I think we should all concentrate on the now, and the future, and not dwell in the
    past.

    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
    what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 21:12:40 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:00:43 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 16/12/2021 00:02, Apd wrote:
    "David Brooks" wrote:
    [nyms]
    'David Brooks' [...]

    =

    NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
    used.

    Your post I now reply to is using the above nym, right here. The
    evidence (MID) is in my "References" header.

    Agreed. ?

    I agree. Solid proof.

    Apart from my very obvious 'I'm not trying to hide' nyms, can you
    identify from whence the other nyms were copied?

    Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
    sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content,
    contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
    slandered dead people to their loved ones.
    Nothing a decent person would post a link to.

    (They were not all from Usenet posts!)

    Thank you for admitting you used so many #FAKE_NYMS. Now all
    you need to do is point out which ones you NEVER used in this list:

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Fri Dec 17 00:21:51 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
    what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    Shadow is a *LIAR*.

    As far as I'm aware, Snit has never lied to me. Why should he?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Dec 17 00:38:33 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
    what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    Shadow is a *LIAR*.

    According to whom?

    Let's see... the people labeling Shadow as a "*LIAR*" are you and
    Glasser (maybe "Billy"?). The people labeling Glasser one: virtually
    everyone he's ever come across on usenet. I'm not sure your 'logic'
    works out too well for you here, either <shrug>.

    As far as I'm aware, Snit has never lied to me.

    Bull that no one buys (not even Glasser).

    Why should he?

    Because that's what narcissistic, pathological liars do.

    Before you finally turn against him he's going to push making a fool out
    of you to the limit... and if his list was still being maintained you'd
    be on it. This isn't conjecture, it's history (which just happens to be
    your future).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 21:32:59 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:21:51 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
    what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.


    As far as I'm aware, Snit has never lied to me. Why should he?

    Psychopaths *LIE*. That's why.

    Maybe, as a friend, you should ask him if he ever posted as
    "Sigmond" and then denied it(it's called a *LIE*).
    Best way to test a friendship is discover if your "friend"
    *LIES* to you too.

    How's the list going?
    Any #FAKE_NYMS you can't recall EVER using?

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 00:39:49 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 17/12/2021 00:12, Shadow is *FULL OF SHIT*!
    [....]
    Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
    sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content, contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
    slandered dead people to their loved ones.

    You are *LYING* again!

    Nothing a decent person would post a link to.

    *YOU*, dear Shadow, are *NOT* "a decent person", so post away to your
    hearts content. Tell everyone about *YOUR* stalking. Fuckwit.

    A number of the so called #FAKE NYMS you quote are actually the names of REAL-LIFE PEOPLE. In other word, *not* MY pseudonyms at all. You been
    lying about this from the get-go.

    I could /swear/ that you have claimed (falsely) that real names should
    not be used on Usenet. Yet here you are, doing that very thing!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Fri Dec 17 00:43:18 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
    what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    Shadow is a *LIAR*.

    According to whom?

    *IT IS A FACT*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 22:02:40 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:39:49 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 00:12, Shadow is <swear words redacted>
    [....]

    Re: #FAKE_NYMS on your "special page"

    Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
    sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content,
    contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
    slandered dead people to their loved ones.

    You are <redacted>again!

    State here you have NEVER uploaded other people's copyrighted
    material and private email content to public servers, stalked/slimed
    innocent people or insulted the deceased.
    Your *WORD* is important.
    Or it should be....


    contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
    slandered dead people to their loved ones.

    Nothing a decent person would post a link to.

    I agree.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kelly Phillips@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 21:25:53 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:39:49 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 00:12, Shadow is *FULL OF SHIT*!
    [....]
    Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
    sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content,
    contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
    slandered dead people to their loved ones.

    You are *LYING* again!

    Lying how? You wanted him to include the fact that you've posted links
    to known malware? Why do you want to look even worse?

    Nothing a decent person would post a link to.

    *YOU*, dear Shadow, are *NOT* "a decent person", so post away to your
    hearts content. Tell everyone about *YOUR* stalking. Fuckwit.

    Would you consider him to be a decent person if he was as dishonest as
    you are on a regular basis? If telling the truth about you is unpleasant
    for you, maybe you should think about improving your behavior. It's
    never too late to start being a good person, right?

    A number of the so called #FAKE NYMS you quote are actually the names of >REAL-LIFE PEOPLE. In other word, *not* MY pseudonyms at all. You been
    lying about this from the get-go.

    It's your problem if you post with a nym that also belongs to a
    real-life person. It's not OK for you to pretend to be someone else.
    That's just part of you being dishonest.

    I could /swear/ that you have claimed (falsely) that real names should
    not be used on Usenet. Yet here you are, doing that very thing!

    The only real name that I use is yours, and that's because it's the name
    (nym) that you use. When you post under another name, even if that name
    also belongs to someone else, the entire fault and blame is on you.
    Don't do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kelly Phillips@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Thu Dec 16 22:14:05 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:43:18 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe >>>> what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    Shadow is a *LIAR*.

    According to whom?

    *IT IS A FACT*

    Please, David, for the love of god, can you just be honest for once in
    your life? Would it really hurt you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Carroll <"Steve@21:1/5 to David Brooks on Fri Dec 17 15:09:04 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
    On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]
    Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe >>>> what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
    write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
    you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
    written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
    the title accordingly.

    Shadow is a *LIAR*.

    According to whom?

    *IT IS A FACT*

    So you're not only an empath you're also the director of the "Ministry
    of Truth"? Glasser likes to be the sole arbiter of every 'discussion' he enters, too. Like minds...

    (I fixed your title again)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Fri Dec 17 16:23:34 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:27:10 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

    I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost.

    LOST?
    Seems you "caught" snit's comprehension disability.
    snit *LIED* through his teeth, and was caught "in flagrante
    delicto".
    LOL.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to Steve Carroll on Sat Dec 18 08:01:59 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On 16/12/2021 13:37, Steve Carroll wrote:
    [....]

    Stop blowing smoke, fool, it's not working.

    You are not being honest.

    Will your children be spending Christmas with you .... or with their mother?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Sat Dec 18 10:44:33 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:01:59 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:


    You are not being honest.

    Posting to yourself *AGAIN*?

    Will your children be spending Christmas with

    He's dead, BD. DEAD!!!. Filicide.
    He won't be spending Xmas with you. You can always try
    confabulating though.
    HTH

    PS Why are you crossposting to a Mac group without an [OT]. Is
    wrecking that group on your agenda too?

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid on Sat Dec 18 10:56:09 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:55:46 +0000, David Brooks
    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    *I was trying to help Snit*

    He's a "bad guy". A *LIAR*, a felon and a troll.
    Why help him and refuse to "help" the "good guys" here?
    Not posting OT trash to a Mac group would be a good start.
    HTH

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 11:04:57 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    *SHADOW LIES*!

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:55:46 +0000, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    *I was trying to HELP Snit*

    ......to determine whether or not Dustin Cook REALLY has a business as
    Cook claims.

    I don't support ANYONE who lies.

    Dustin Cook lies. He /claims/ that he LIKES to hurt people.

    That, surely, *IS* a lie ...... isn't it?

    If Dustin Cook provided his business information it would show that he
    really had 'turned a corner' and was now being open and honest.

    He could then, at long last, put his evil past behind him. A true gift
    for Christmas! :-D

    =

    For anyone who is unaware, Mr Cook wrote the IROK virus, published under
    his RAID/SLAM pseudonymn, details of which may be found here:- https://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/irok.shtml

    =

    Irok is a virus-worm created by RaiD/SLAM which spreads via IRC and
    Microsoft Outlook. The worm is 10001 bytes long DOS-based program that
    is heavily packed and encrypted with a protective envelope that uses anti-debugging tricks.

    When run, the worm copies itself to C:\Windows\System\ and C:\Mirc\
    folders as IROK.EXE and drops WINRDE.DLL to the \Windows\System\ folder.
    This file is not a Windows DLL, it is a data file. The worm also
    replaces SCRIPT.INI file in the C:\Mirc\ folder with its own script that
    sends the IROK.EXE file to everyone on the IRC channel to which the
    infected user joins. The worm finally drops a Visual Basic script file IROKRUN.VBS to the Windows Startup directory. This script will be
    executed next time the system is restarted.

    During the next Windows startup, the IROKRUN.VBS script will be
    executed. It uses Microsoft Outlook to send the worm executable as
    IROK.EXE to 60 recipients whose addresses are taken from each of
    Outlook's address books.

    The message in which the worm spreads itself looks like this:

    Subject: I thought you might like to see this.
    Body:

    I thought you might like this. I got it from paramount pictures
    website. It's a startrek screen saver.

    =

    After every message is sent they are removed from the 'Sent Items'
    folder. Finally the script file is removed from the Windows Startup
    directory.

    At the same time Irok is a non-resident virus, which scans directories
    listed in PATH= variable for COM and EXE files and then infects them.
    The virus is a very fast infector. It can infect up to 80 files at a
    time. The virus is relocating type - it writes itself to the start of
    the file and relocates the original 10kb of the file to the end. The
    relocated part is encrypted. Infected files grow 10kb in size.

    In some cases the virus can corrupt host programs. The virus has a bug
    and it does not supply command line options to the host program
    correctly, so every program that operates with command line parameters
    will work incorrectly after infection.

    The virus avoids infecting files that have extensions and/or their names
    start with one of the following:

    dll spa man drv scr krnl 386 msc com exp mou gw go sta use gdi con
    The virus also deletes the following files:

    anti-vir.dat
    chklist.ms
    chklist.cps
    vs.vsn
    ivb.ntz
    When internal counters of the virus reach certain values, the virus
    displays a message on the screen. Most of this message is taken from
    lyrics of the song 'Aenema' by the band called 'Tool'. We will not
    reproduce the message here as the song seriously needs the Parental
    Advisory sticker for explicit lyrics.

    The message ends with this text:

    People cry and people moan. look for a dry place to call their
    own, look for a dry place to rest there bones.
    Thanks for reading the text above, I've had enough time to
    remove the contents of your hard disk for you. :-)

    IRoK v1.1 - RaiD/SLAM[2000]

    And indeed, the virus has corrupted files on the hard drive during this
    event.

    The virus also has several internal text strings:

    IRoK v1.1 is initializing... Ok!

    Hey You!
    <----------- >>> Push enter stupid!

    RaiD/SLAM[2000]

    The Irok virus-worm will not spread itself via Outlook if Windows
    Scripting Host is not installed on the infected system. The worm will
    not work if Windows is installed in some other directory than
    C:\Windows\ and it will not spread itself via IRC if mIRC is installed
    in a directory other than C:\Mirc\. Regardless of software installed,
    the worm will infect COM and EXE files on the system it infects.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 08:25:13 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:04:57 +0000, David Brooks
    <BDB@nomailatall.invalid> wrote:

    It's a Linux/Mac/Windows command.

    Try "man ping"

    Or in your case:

    "gay ping"

    It might bring more colorful information.
    HTH, as always.

    PS OT up. Why are you attempting to wreck the Mac groups? Did
    they *BAN* (killfile) you *AGAIN*?

    <slight snip of inappropriate text>

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s

    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 12:43:36 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    Shadow *LIES* like a hairy egg!

    <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    *I was trying to HELP Snit*

    ......to determine whether or not Dustin Cook REALLY has a business as
    Cook claims.

    I don't support ANYONE who lies.

    Dustin Cook lies. He /claims/ that he LIKES to hurt people.

    That, surely, *IS* a lie ...... isn't it?

    If Dustin Cook provided his business information it would show that he
    really had 'turned a corner' and was now being open and honest.

    He could then, at long last, put his evil past behind him. A true gift
    for Christmas!

    =

    For anyone who is unaware, Mr Cook wrote the IROK virus, published under
    his RAID/SLAM pseudonymn, details of which may be found here:- https://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/irok.shtml

    =

    Irok is a virus-worm created by RaiD/SLAM which spreads via IRC and
    Microsoft Outlook. The worm is 10001 bytes long DOS-based program that
    is heavily packed and encrypted with a protective envelope that uses anti-debugging tricks.

    When run, the worm copies itself to C:\Windows\System\ and C:\Mirc\
    folders as IROK.EXE and drops WINRDE.DLL to the \Windows\System\ folder.
    This file is not a Windows DLL, it is a data file. The worm also
    replaces SCRIPT.INI file in the C:\Mirc\ folder with its own script that
    sends the IROK.EXE file to everyone on the IRC channel to which the
    infected user joins. The worm finally drops a Visual Basic script file IROKRUN.VBS to the Windows Startup directory. This script will be
    executed next time the system is restarted.

    During the next Windows startup, the IROKRUN.VBS script will be
    executed. It uses Microsoft Outlook to send the worm executable as
    IROK.EXE to 60 recipients whose addresses are taken from each of
    Outlook's address books.

    The message in which the worm spreads itself looks like this:

    Subject: I thought you might like to see this.
    Body:

    I thought you might like this. I got it from paramount pictures
    website. It's a startrek screen saver.

    =

    After every message is sent they are removed from the 'Sent Items'
    folder. Finally the script file is removed from the Windows Startup
    directory.

    At the same time Irok is a non-resident virus, which scans directories
    listed in PATH= variable for COM and EXE files and then infects them.
    The virus is a very fast infector. It can infect up to 80 files at a
    time. The virus is relocating type - it writes itself to the start of
    the file and relocates the original 10kb of the file to the end. The
    relocated part is encrypted. Infected files grow 10kb in size.

    In some cases the virus can corrupt host programs. The virus has a bug
    and it does not supply command line options to the host program
    correctly, so every program that operates with command line parameters
    will work incorrectly after infection.

    The virus avoids infecting files that have extensions and/or their names
    start with one of the following:

    dll spa man drv scr krnl 386 msc com exp mou gw go sta use gdi con
    The virus also deletes the following files:

    anti-vir.dat
    chklist.ms
    chklist.cps
    vs.vsn
    ivb.ntz
    When internal counters of the virus reach certain values, the virus
    displays a message on the screen. Most of this message is taken from
    lyrics of the song 'Aenema' by the band called 'Tool'. We will not
    reproduce the message here as the song seriously needs the Parental
    Advisory sticker for explicit lyrics.

    The message ends with this text:

    People cry and people moan. look for a dry place to call their
    own, look for a dry place to rest there bones.
    Thanks for reading the text above, I've had enough time to
    remove the contents of your hard disk for you.

    IRoK v1.1 - RaiD/SLAM[2000]

    And indeed, the virus has corrupted files on the hard drive during this
    event.

    The virus also has several internal text strings:

    IRoK v1.1 is initializing... Ok!

    Hey You!
    <----------- >>> Push enter stupid!

    RaiD/SLAM[2000]

    The Irok virus-worm will not spread itself via Outlook if Windows
    Scripting Host is not installed on the infected system. The worm will
    not work if Windows is installed in some other directory than
    C:\Windows\ and it will not spread itself via IRC if mIRC is installed
    in a directory other than C:\Mirc\. Regardless of software installed,
    the worm will infect COM and EXE files on the system it infects.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to DavidBrooks@nomail.afraid.org on Sun Dec 19 17:03:27 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:43:36 +0000, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    *I was trying to HELP Snit*

    ......to determine whether or not <STALKING_TARGET_05> REALLY has a business as
    <he> claims.

    STALKING people on the Internet is a serious cybercrime.
    Thanks for confessing you are a "gang". I believe that makes
    it more heinous crime.

    Try to confess with an OT up next time.

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s


    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 21:02:22 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    Sorry - but he does!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to BDB@nomailatall.invalid on Sun Dec 19 18:18:38 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:02:22 +0000, David Brooks
    <BDB@nomailatall.invalid> wrote:

    Sorry

    Just stop *LYING*. You won't need to apologyse all the time.
    HTH

    On 2021 Dec 19, David Brooks wrote
    (in article <AE05CADD8208837B93@46.165.242.75>):

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brooks@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 22:25:15 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    apologyse

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to BDB@nomailatall.invalid on Sun Dec 19 20:23:51 2021
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 22:25:15 +0000, David Brooks
    <BDB@nomailatall.invalid> wrote:

    apologyse

    You should apologize for *LYING* all the time.
    And for thinking a base64 encode is "secret agent" stuff.
    And for not putting an OT up.
    And for drinking too much.
    And ...

    I'll keep it short. Everyone "got to know you better".

    ------------------------------------
    BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
    hide".
    I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
    rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

    <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

    104 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
    Google "David Brooks Stalker".
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)