1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.UNISYS

  • Unexpected growth of COMS/TTRAIL

    From Marco Figueira@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 23 17:04:26 2021
    Please if anyone can help me.
    Unexpectedly the COMS/TTRAIL file started to grow a lot and quickly, however I still haven't discovered the origin of this growth.
    Has anyone, by any chance, been through this situation? Do you know how to solve it?
    Thanks!
    Marco Figueira
    Rio de Janeiro/Brasil

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Kimpel@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 24 08:28:49 2021
    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Unexpected growth of COMS/TTRAIL
    From: Marco Figueira <marco.figueira@gmail.com>
    To:
    Date: Fri Jul 23 2021 17:04:26 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)

    Please if anyone can help me.
    Unexpectedly the COMS/TTRAIL file started to grow a lot and quickly, however I still haven't discovered the origin of this growth.
    Has anyone, by any chance, been through this situation? Do you know how to solve it?
    Thanks!
    Marco Figueira
    Rio de Janeiro/Brasil


    Is this the default, non-data base TTRAIL (TPLIBRARY) or one associated
    with a COMS DATABASE declaration?

    Have any of the TTRAIL options been changed lately, e.g., STATISTICS or
    AUDIT? See the section "Controlling Transaction Trails" in the
    Transaction Server Operations Guide.

    Is it possible you are simply experiencing an increase in the number of transactions coming into COMS? Have you tried looking at the TTRAIL
    files to see what is in there? The format is described in an appendix to
    the Transaction Server Programming Guide.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Figueira@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 26 07:54:40 2021
    Em sábado, 24 de julho de 2021 às 12:28:50 UTC-3, Paul Kimpel escreveu:

    Thanks Paul, for your quick response!
    Now, my coments...

    Is this the default, non-data base TTRAIL (TPLIBRARY) or one associated
    with a COMS DATABASE declaration?
    Default, as far I know.
    Example:
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2490 07/23/2021 @ 15:50:28
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2491 07/23/2021 @ 16:24:17
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2492 07/23/2021 @ 16:57:53
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2493 07/23/2021 @ 17:36:15
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2494 07/23/2021 @ 18:19:00
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2495 07/23/2021 @ 18:55:09
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2496 07/23/2021 @ 19:49:44
    *COMS/TTRAIL/TPLIBRARY/2497 07/23/2021 @ 20:49:55

    Have any of the TTRAIL options been changed lately, e.g., STATISTICS or AUDIT? See the section "Controlling Transaction Trails" in the
    Transaction Server Operations Guide.
    I don't know, but I'll check it out, thanks.


    Is it possible you are simply experiencing an increase in the number of transactions coming into COMS? Have you tried looking at the TTRAIL
    files to see what is in there? The format is described in an appendix to
    the Transaction Server Programming Guide.
    that's what we're trying to do right now.
    anyway, we turned off the statistic (COMS STATISTICS OFF) and the sudden growth stopped.

    Thanks for the tips and we'll keep trying here,
    giving news about progress. Feel free to add comments

    [ ]´s
    Marco

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)