• Diagnostics error on a Sun Fire 240

    From Martin McDonough@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 13 20:03:12 2018
    Working on starting up a Sun Fire 240, I get the orange light on the back. According to the diagnostics, the IO-Bridge for CPU 0 has failed.

    Does this indicate that the CPU must be replaced, or is that a component on the motherboard? Is it possible a faulty CPU would trigger that error?

    Thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin McDonough@21:1/5 to Martin McDonough on Sun Apr 22 01:27:52 2018
    On Friday, April 13, 2018 at 8:03:15 PM UTC-7, Martin McDonough wrote:
    Working on starting up a Sun Fire 240, I get the orange light on the back. According to the diagnostics, the IO-Bridge for CPU 0 has failed.

    Does this indicate that the CPU must be replaced, or is that a component on the motherboard? Is it possible a faulty CPU would trigger that error?

    Thanks.

    Well, after digging out some CPUs from a Sun Fire 210, and installing them in the 240, I can answer my own question. It seems the IO Bridge resides on the motherboard, and the issue cannot be fixed just by replacing the CPUs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Martin McDonough on Sat Jul 7 12:19:11 2018
    On 04/22/18 09:27, Martin McDonough wrote:
    On Friday, April 13, 2018 at 8:03:15 PM UTC-7, Martin McDonough wrote:
    Working on starting up a Sun Fire 240, I get the orange light on the back. According to the diagnostics, the IO-Bridge for CPU 0 has failed.

    Does this indicate that the CPU must be replaced, or is that a component on the motherboard? Is it possible a faulty CPU would trigger that error?

    Thanks.

    Well, after digging out some CPUs from a Sun Fire 210, and installing them in the 240, I can answer my own question. It seems the IO Bridge resides on the motherboard, and the issue cannot be fixed just by replacing the CPUs.


    I'm a bit late with this, but if you are in the uk, have a V240
    or two for free, or just a m/board if you can organise the
    shipping...

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin McDonough@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Jul 7 20:41:06 2018
    On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:19:13 AM UTC-7, Chris wrote:
    On 04/22/18 09:27, Martin McDonough wrote:
    On Friday, April 13, 2018 at 8:03:15 PM UTC-7, Martin McDonough wrote:
    Working on starting up a Sun Fire 240, I get the orange light on the back. According to the diagnostics, the IO-Bridge for CPU 0 has failed.

    Does this indicate that the CPU must be replaced, or is that a component on the motherboard? Is it possible a faulty CPU would trigger that error?

    Thanks.

    Well, after digging out some CPUs from a Sun Fire 210, and installing them in the 240, I can answer my own question. It seems the IO Bridge resides on the motherboard, and the issue cannot be fixed just by replacing the CPUs.


    I'm a bit late with this, but if you are in the uk, have a V240
    or two for free, or just a m/board if you can organise the
    shipping...

    Chris

    I'm not in the UK, unfortunately. Thanks for the offer though.

    I did go through some of my old hardware about a month ago, and I found a 240 that passes all diagnostics and gets to the OK prompt. My plan now is to load it with the drives and RAM from the machine I was working on before.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Martin McDonough on Wed Jul 11 00:47:43 2018
    On 07/08/18 04:41, Martin McDonough wrote:


    I'm not in the UK, unfortunately. Thanks for the offer though.

    I did go through some of my old hardware about a month ago, and

    I found a 240 that passes all diagnostics and gets to the OK prompt.

    My plan now is to load it with the drives and RAM from the machine

    I was working on before.

    If you are happy with command line, V240 will run FreeBSD, which
    actually runs pretty well. I run it on a slightly later
    V215. Frame buffer drivers are a problem and you will have to build
    packages as required, but you can build Xvnc and use that to get a
    remote desktop. Plus of course, you also get zfs and jails. Solaris
    10 just works out of the box and you can get a working desktop by
    adding a low end XVR100 graphics card or similar. Great machine to
    get working and do some real work :-)...

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin McDonough@21:1/5 to Chris on Tue Jul 10 17:33:50 2018
    On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:47:44 PM UTC-7, Chris wrote:
    On 07/08/18 04:41, Martin McDonough wrote:


    I'm not in the UK, unfortunately. Thanks for the offer though.

    I did go through some of my old hardware about a month ago, and

    I found a 240 that passes all diagnostics and gets to the OK prompt.

    My plan now is to load it with the drives and RAM from the machine

    I was working on before.

    If you are happy with command line, V240 will run FreeBSD, which
    actually runs pretty well. I run it on a slightly later
    V215. Frame buffer drivers are a problem and you will have to build
    packages as required, but you can build Xvnc and use that to get a
    remote desktop. Plus of course, you also get zfs and jails. Solaris
    10 just works out of the box and you can get a working desktop by
    adding a low end XVR100 graphics card or similar. Great machine to
    get working and do some real work :-)...

    Chris

    I do have an XVR 100 card. I've been running OpenBSD on my 240s, since it seems to work a bit better the FreeBSD and supports the graphics card out of the box (even starting up with it enabled, which Solaris 10 did not).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Martin McDonough on Tue Jul 17 23:33:58 2018
    On 07/11/18 01:33, Martin McDonough wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:47:44 PM UTC-7, Chris wrote:
    On 07/08/18 04:41, Martin McDonough wrote:


    I'm not in the UK, unfortunately. Thanks for the offer though.

    I did go through some of my old hardware about a month ago, and

    I found a 240 that passes all diagnostics and gets to the OK prompt.

    My plan now is to load it with the drives and RAM from the machine

    I was working on before.

    If you are happy with command line, V240 will run FreeBSD, which
    actually runs pretty well. I run it on a slightly later
    V215. Frame buffer drivers are a problem and you will have to build
    packages as required, but you can build Xvnc and use that to get a
    remote desktop. Plus of course, you also get zfs and jails. Solaris
    10 just works out of the box and you can get a working desktop by
    adding a low end XVR100 graphics card or similar. Great machine to
    get working and do some real work :-)...

    Chris

    I do have an XVR 100 card. I've been running OpenBSD on my 240s, since it seems to work a

    bit better the FreeBSD and supports the graphics card out of the box
    (even starting up

    with it enabled, which Solaris 10 did not).

    Solaris 10 should work out of the box on a V240, but you must have a
    keyboard and frame buffer in the machine and select everything on
    the install, to be sure. Should come up with a desktop login on
    reboot.

    Not tried OpenBSD, but must find time this year to do that. Currently
    working through a decades long Sun collection. A couple of 3/60's,
    3/50's, one with the dimpled base, a 3/150, various Sparc lx, ipx, ipc
    etc, plus later v series and others. A 3/60 was the first
    serious unix box here, around 1993, recovered from a junkyard, no
    drives, broken colour monitor case but fixed it up. Used it for
    couple of years for software development and learning, before getting
    a Sparcstation 1+. Main problem with such older machines is power
    supplies and have already replaced caps and fans in several machines
    in the past month or so. Must have too much time on my hands these days,
    but even the 3/60 is quite fast enough for general interactive use,
    openwindows etc. You really notice it when compiling a package, but
    otherwise pretty good. These early workstations help design and
    implement much of what we take for granted these days and remember the amazement at how good they were when first saw those machines working.
    They had Sun 3's and later Sparc at companies I worked for back then
    and got well infected. An engineers tool, designed by engineers for
    engineers. They were to be found everywhere, when any half way
    professional windows was a decade away :-)...

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)