On 2023-07-19, John <john@building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net> wrote:
Anybody ever notice that the structure of comp.sys is basically readyIronically, accesing FIDO and DOVEnet thru nntp, cvs.synchro.net:119
laid for retrocomputing discussion? More or less everything that was
current back when the hierarchy was defined is now a historical
artifact.
john
gives you actual discussions on modern themes (also, talks over
retro systems) with over two
ancient protocols stacked over...
Anybody ever notice that the structure of comp.sys is basically readyIronically, accesing FIDO and DOVEnet thru nntp, cvs.synchro.net:119
laid for retrocomputing discussion? More or less everything that was
current back when the hierarchy was defined is now a historical
artifact.
john
Anybody ever notice that the structure of comp.sys is basically readyIronically, accesing FIDO and DOVEnet thru nntp, cvs.synchro.net:119
laid for retrocomputing discussion? More or less everything that was
current back when the hierarchy was defined is now a historical
artifact.
john
gives you actual discussions on modern themes (also, talks over
retro systems) with over two
ancient protocols stacked over...
Interesting, do they peer?
bozo user <anthk@disroot.org> writes:
On 2023-07-19, John <john@building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net> wrote:
Anybody ever notice that the structure of comp.sys is basically readyIronically, accesing FIDO and DOVEnet thru nntp, cvs.synchro.net:119
laid for retrocomputing discussion? More or less everything that was
current back when the hierarchy was defined is now a historical
artifact.
john
gives you actual discussions on modern themes (also, talks over
retro systems) with over two
ancient protocols stacked over...
Interesting, do they peer?
john
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 462 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 67:07:36 |
Calls: | 9,373 |
Files: | 13,549 |
Messages: | 6,087,880 |