Another factoid, the Lacuna and Reply boards use IDE.
Even _IF_ the BIU / IDE thing is a lead weight, I don't expect a non-IDE
/ non-BIU system to hit 10MB/s...
So even though Albert Einstein breathed air like I do, that correlation
does not mean that we are both geniuses...
Louis Ohland wrote:
https://www.ardent-tool.com/tech/ASIC_Info.html#71G0438
The Lacuna and Reply use BIUs, The Reply 60/80 also actually has an SSC.
_MAYBE_ the inclusion of a BIU turbo-diddles the performance of the 9-K?
A weg to investigate this angle would be to use a Type 3 ["M"] or a Type
4 ["N"] complex, both of which do not have a BIU.
Kevin Bowling wrote:
That the Lacuna and Reply perform so low is disappointing, but maybe
there's a reason why IBM did not sell this adapter to PS/2 users - or
maybe we will find a magic switch to make the card operate faster.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)