• Vampyr

    From T987654321@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 21 11:50:02 2020
    Enjoying Vampyr's story. With the silly third person camera not only is combat a complete chore (as with all such games), worse the third person complete keeps the player unimersed in the world.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rin Stowleigh@21:1/5 to qwrtz123@gmail.com on Sat Mar 21 21:36:47 2020
    On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:50:02 -0800 (PST), T987654321
    <qwrtz123@gmail.com> wrote:

    Enjoying Vampyr's story. With the silly third person camera not only is combat a complete chore (as with all such games), worse the third person complete keeps the player unimersed in the world.

    For a twist on that, try Red Dead Redemption for PC.. It has a first
    person mode, which is quite well done. But it will convince you that
    some games are just made for third person.

    I did pick up Vampyr on a sale, and launched it briefly, and it did
    not feel "right" with a mouse and third person. Maybe playable, but
    it is not a natural fit like some games. That may have more to do
    with the amount of time spent on optimizing for mouse play than it
    does the actual choice of perspective.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rin Stowleigh@21:1/5 to rstowleigh@xnospamx.com on Sat Mar 21 21:37:18 2020
    On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:36:47 -0400, Rin Stowleigh
    <rstowleigh@xnospamx.com> wrote:

    For a twist on that, try Red Dead Redemption for PC..

    Correction, RDR2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner P.@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 22 20:10:35 2020
    Am 22.03.20 um 02:37 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
    On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:36:47 -0400, Rin Stowleigh
    <rstowleigh@xnospamx.com> wrote:

    For a twist on that, try Red Dead Redemption for PC..

    Correction, RDR2

    Speaking of RDR... RPCS3 made huge inroads on performance level, if you
    have a good pc there is a high chance that RDR now works better on the
    PC than on the original PS3.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rin Stowleigh@21:1/5 to Werner P. on Sun Mar 22 18:12:19 2020
    On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:10:35 +0100, "Werner P." <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:

    Am 22.03.20 um 02:37 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
    On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:36:47 -0400, Rin Stowleigh
    <rstowleigh@xnospamx.com> wrote:

    For a twist on that, try Red Dead Redemption for PC..

    Correction, RDR2

    Speaking of RDR... RPCS3 made huge inroads on performance level, if you
    have a good pc there is a high chance that RDR now works better on the
    PC than on the original PS3.

    For me, RDR2 is all about Red Dead Online and the various roles
    (collector, bounty hunter, trader, moonshiner, etc) and assuming RDR1
    does have an online mode I doubt it still has much of a community
    left.

    The story never really interested me much in these games. I never was
    really an MMO guy but thats essentially what online mode is. As far I
    know there's no way to see how many hours I've got into it, but I
    think it has probably taken the #1 spot as my most hours spent playing
    a single game. In fact I think I've spent more time in this already
    since the PC version was released in November than probably the sum of
    hours played in my top 20 played games over the last 10 years.

    And believe me I'm not proud of this fact :) It's just a great game.

    For reference I played the PS4 version of RDR2 maybe 10 hours (but
    that was story mode, and Rockstar had not yet released the online mode
    for it).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)