At the spring WG14 meeting, there were various proposals on how to deal
with the intmax_t problem (intmax_t being baked into ABIs makes it hard
to grow it). One would have been to remove all use of intmax_t in the standard libary to get it out of the ABI. But in the end, a much more
radical decision was made: Remove intmax_t without replacement.
Do you have a reference to this? Did they really decide to remove
intmax_t altogether?
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2498.pdf (dated
2020-02-29) is a proposal to keep (u)intmax_t but deprecate library
functions that depend on them. Removing (u)intmax_t altogether would
break existing code.
See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/PreFreiburg2020.htm
for some other similar proposals.
[...]
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 384 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 62:52:24 |
Calls: | 8,174 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,113 |
Messages: | 5,864,574 |