• Risks Digest 32.40 (2/2)

    From RISKS List Owner@21:1/5 to Ben Kamen on Sat Dec 12 04:03:10 2020
    [continued from previous message]

    Subject: Re: Is Alexa Becoming Anti-semitic (RISKS-32.39)

    I should note the the piece on anti-semitism and AI contains assertions that are politically contested. I'm particularly referring to the notion that criticisms of the state of Israel are inherently anti-Semitic.

    The framing of the piece conflated anti-semitism -- a real and pernicious
    type of racism -- with political criticism of Israel -- a legitimate form of free speech.

    In affect, this highlights just how wicked hard applying AI to news/speech/politics is.

    ------------------------------

    Date: 5 Dec 2020 17:23:44 -0500
    From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
    Subject: Re: Rashida Tlaib takes on stablecoins, not cryptocurrency (R-32.39)

    cosponsored a bill requiring stablecoins like Facebook's Libra to be
    issued by banks.

    The important word is "stablecoins"; this is quite reasonable.

    A stablecoin promises that you can redeem it for some amount of real
    money. That means that each coin is in effect a demand loan of the
    underlying value to whomever holds the money, and it makes sense to regulate them like other organizations that accept demand loans and give you an
    IOU. These organizations are generally called banks.

    The best known stablecoin, Tether, claims you can redeem every tether for $1 but outside the crypto bubble it is widely considered to be a fraud. There
    have been over 18 billion tether issued and there is no evidence that tether has anything close to $18 billion in assets. Last year in a lawsuit their lawyer asserted that they had 74c for each tether but there's not much
    evidence of that either.

    The usual risk is that as soon as someone says BLOCKCHAIN! a certain number
    of people check their common sense at the door.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 09:36:34 +0800
    From: Richard Stein <rmstein@ieee.org>
    Subject: Re: Keyhole wasps may threaten aviation safety (RISKS-32.39)

    Ben -- Thank you for this informed response to my post. I am forwarding
    your response as follow up on this thread.

    On 5/12/20 12:05 pm, Ben Kamen wrote:

    As a private pilot that owns a small 2 seater (and we talk about blocked pitot tubes a lot) - the problem isn't new as mud daubers have been doing this for a long time. (if this is the same species)

    In areas where they are prolific or to be safe, any time the plane is
    parked outside, pitot covers are recommended.

    The bigger problem isn't completely blocked tubes because a dead airspeed indicator would be obvious on rollout for takeoff.

    What most of us worry about more is partially blocked tubes that give
    faulty readings.

    Also being an EE, I could image some interesting tests for startup, but
    the FAA does like simplicity and fiber could be a problem because pitot
    tubes have heaters built into them to melt off any ice-buildup in incing conditions. Even my 2-seater that's not certified for flying into known
    icing conditions has a pitot heater. So a remote visual sensing system
    would have to deal with that.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:01:34 -0800
    From: Carlos Villalpando <unbelver@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Keyhole wasps may threaten aviation safety (RISKS-32.39)

    Would a power-on-self-test be able to discern if the inlet is bugged
    via fiber optic signal and sensor?

    Wasps nests in pitot tubes are a long-known issue in aviation. In North America, at least, the offending species is the Mud Dauber Wasp. As the
    linked article points out pitot tube covers are the current method of controlling such issues.

    How is it detected? A thorough pre-flight is key, but daubers can get pretty deep into the tube, beyond inspection ability. So issues with the Air Speed Indicator (ASI) are detected procedurally. Small aircraft crews, during the takeoff roll, are supposed to note that the ASI "comes alive" and is
    behaving consistent with the expected takeoff performance roll early enough
    to abort if necessary. Professional airline crews do the same, but also cross-check between the Captain's and First Officers' ASIs.

    But as it is a human procedure, humans can fail at it. Birgenair Flight 301
    is an example of a pitot tube blocked by a wasp nest, with the pilots
    noticing, but ignoring the warnings, with all occupants perishing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birgenair_Flight_301

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2020 11:11:11 -0800
    From: RISKS-request@csl.sri.com
    Subject: Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)

    The ACM RISKS Forum is a MODERATED digest. Its Usenet manifestation is
    comp.risks, the feed for which is donated by panix.com as of June 2011.
    SUBSCRIPTIONS: The mailman Web interface can be used directly to
    subscribe and unsubscribe:
    http://mls.csl.sri.com/mailman/listinfo/risks

    SUBMISSIONS: to risks@CSL.sri.com with meaningful SUBJECT: line that
    includes the string `notsp'. Otherwise your message may not be read.
    *** This attention-string has never changed, but might if spammers use it.
    SPAM challenge-responses will not be honored. Instead, use an alternative
    address from which you never send mail where the address becomes public!
    The complete INFO file (submissions, default disclaimers, archive sites,
    copyright policy, etc.) is online.
    <http://www.CSL.sri.com/risksinfo.html>
    *** Contributors are assumed to have read the full info file for guidelines!

    OFFICIAL ARCHIVES: http://www.risks.org takes you to Lindsay Marshall's
    searchable html archive at newcastle:
    http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/VL.IS --> VoLume, ISsue.
    Also, ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks for the current volume/previous directories
    or ftp://ftp.sri.com/VL/risks-VL.IS for previous VoLume
    If none of those work for you, the most recent issue is always at
    http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt, and index at /risks-32.00
    ALTERNATIVE ARCHIVES: http://seclists.org/risks/ (only since mid-2001)
    *** NOTE: If a cited URL fails, we do not try to update them. Try
    browsing on the keywords in the subject line or cited article leads.
    Apologies for what Office365 and SafeLinks may have done to URLs.
    Special Offer to Join ACM for readers of the ACM RISKS Forum:
    <http://www.acm.org/joinacm1>

    ------------------------------

    End of RISKS-FORUM Digest 32.40
    ************************

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)